![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Discrete Scale Relativity models subatomic particles as quantized Kerr- Newman ultracompact objects. In the following paper the masses of 27 well-known particles were retrodicted at the 98.4% level, on average. http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0701/0701006.pdf [see section 4] The relevant equation based on a Kerr solution is M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass of 674.8 MeV). Here is a demonstration for a particle NOT included in the published paper. J/Psi mass = 3095 MeV Does the M = (sqrt n)(674.8 MeV) equation work for J/Psi? You betcha! M = (sqrt 21)(674.8 MeV) = 3092.3 MeV That's agreement at the 99.9% level. No quarks needed. Just classical General Relativity and a little Quantum Mechanics. Hmmm, time for a new paradigm? RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where does the mass of the particle come from? | socratus[_2_] | Misc | 1 | April 4th 09 08:39 AM |
computation of subatomic particle mass improved fivefold | Kent Paul Dolan | Research | 0 | November 24th 08 11:03 AM |
Father of science Newton has perceived it (light energy mass-inter conversion) two centuries before Einstein, but without mathematical derivation. | fleesow | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 27th 07 11:53 PM |
Theoretical derivation of mass-luminosity relation | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 25th 07 12:03 PM |
DeltaV, Exhaust Velocity, and Particle Mass? | Benjamin B | Technology | 6 | March 2nd 06 03:09 PM |