![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 2, 5:54 am, Tom Roberts wrote in
sci.physics.relativity: Jenny wrote: On Jan 1, 3:33 pm, eric gisse wrote: A force is conservative if F = -grad (some potential). [...] The "-" sign makes no difference to the "numerology". Not true. The minus sign is ESSENTIAL. Otherwise there would be a force pushing an object to a higher energy state, and all sorts of fundamental physical laws would be violated. For example, with such a "force" it would be dead easy to build a perpetual motion machine that generated arbitrary amounts of free energy. Honest Roberts, a perpetual motion machine that generates an unlimited amount of energy out of nothing is a direct corollary of Einstein's 1905 false light postulate. The very long rod trapped inside a very short container would exert such a force on the doors of the container that Einsteinians, by harnessing this force, would be able to solve all energy problems of humankind: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...35b8b38f2a49d? EINSTEINIANA AS PERPETUUM MOBILE Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conservative Change | Foul Weather Patriot | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 03:59 PM |
dickie's luck signs in search of our conservative after we install without it | Latif Al Sistani | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 29th 07 08:24 PM |
ok mutter her secret conservative | Candy[_3_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 7th 07 06:55 AM |
transaction evokes Ayaz Ayman Al Queda's conservative | Petra V. Larriva | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 23rd 07 03:43 AM |
Conservative Article - Who To Blame? | Raving Loonie | Misc | 0 | September 10th 05 05:33 PM |