![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 17, 4:45*pm, David Spain wrote:
Pat Flannery writes: The free pdf of the book is hehttp://www.neofuel.com/inhabit/inhabit..pdf Pat So I've always wondered what would be easier and more cost effective. A "fixed fuel" design based on a set number of stored, pre-built bombs, or flying a production reactor that could produce plutonium and deuterium and/or tritium on-the-fly as well as generate electricity for the spacecraft? The bombs get built as needed and it gives the crew something to do (yes, other than expanding the crew) during the interstellar legs of the flight. I'm purposely ignoring all the treaties that'd have to be redone in order to enable any of this... Dave http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_pulse_propulsion |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nuclear Orion Memories | Pat Flannery | History | 64 | January 4th 10 01:01 AM |
Nuclear Orion Memories | David Spain | Policy | 5 | December 2nd 09 12:05 AM |
Project Orion: 10-meter nuclear pulse vehicles in detail | [email protected] | History | 11 | May 4th 08 09:21 PM |
Project Orion - a massive, nuclear-powered spacecraft | [email protected][_1_] | Policy | 1 | February 15th 08 10:41 PM |