![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I'll start...
- actions that *were* taken by members of this forum, I learned of the STS-107 foam impact halfway into the mission. I contacted specialists within USA, Boeing and Lockheed Martin. I was shocked to learn that JSC was not proactively working to deal with the worst case scenario of critical thermal protection damage. - actions that *could have been* done. Prior to -107s entry, there are many others I could have contacted, both inside and outside of the program. My gut feel was that the foam impact analysis was insufficient. I chose not to press the issue further. Part of my reason was out of trust for those who made such decisions (I understand Leroy Cain to be an exceptionally wise leader). Another part was out of my feeling that I was lacking in any obligation to interfere with those decisions (this is the part that troubles me most). In the aftermath of the destruction, we've all seen how sci.space has served as an excellent brainstorming forum on what could have been done. Had there been an open discussion of the problem while Columbia was still on orbit, solutions generated within this forum could possibly have had a significant affect in helping -107. I had attained the ascent video of the foam strike through a private channel. I chose to constrain my response to private interactions (mentioned above). I'm sure that there are others here who have been wrestling with their own personal accountability regarding this tragedy. However peripheral our role may have been, there are always options of contacting NASA, Congress, the press and others. There were a multitude of failures that formed links in the causal chain leading to this horrific loss of orbiter and crew. I count my decision to not do more as an opportunity lost. And I see the composite decision of everyone who had knowledge of the critical threats facing the vehicle and its crew members... the composite decision of authorities within the program, as well as observers outside of the program, to be responsible for the tragic outcome. Surely there are few outside of the program who can be held accountable, but we all had an ability-to-respond to the situation, and this equates to our responsibility. Our failure. ~ CT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any interest in more live MER Mission Control Coverage? | David Fred | Space Science Misc | 4 | February 13th 04 05:53 AM |
Two Wide-angle Imaging Neutral-atom Spectrometers (TWINS) mission | Gunter Krebs | Space Science Misc | 0 | August 5th 03 11:20 AM |
NASA Names Return To Flight Task Group Members | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 25th 03 11:16 PM |
Space Shuttle Mission Management Team Transcripts Released | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 21st 03 11:19 PM |