![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Earnest escreveu:
**The gravity of Earth only appears to be bending the straight line of light from the star. It isn't truly bending it at all. As you can tell when you are looking at the star. Being at the endpoint of a path of light, how can you tell it's not bent? And no, it is not Earth's small gravity which made it bend from the star until getting here. **Same thing with motion. The star only appears to be a little off from where it actually is. But you are seeing it where it actually is. No, you're seeing the light of a star from, say, 2,000 years ago. It is way off of its current position in space. **Hint: seeing is a lot more then simply light hitting the retina. It involves comprehending. **iow: your mind processes the stars into their correct positions. You may ask that to anyone plotting trajectories of rockets and so forth. Much more evident on larger scales than everyday human ones, which is what you experience is telling you... **Trajectories these days are always curves, not lines. Exactly what I said. What are you missing? **Nothing. Why did you bring it up? I did brought it up precisely to show you that plotting trajectories will never involve straight lines because it's unreal not to take into account forces applying on the body. Straight lines are only straight in a perfect, mathbook, Ptolomaic universe, not this one. **There is nothing imperfect about this universe. It is our observations and understanding of it that are imperfect. Not mine, yours. I don't even need to go as far as Einstein complex transforms to show you that: according to Newton, a body is supposed to maintain its state of rest or constant velocity if no force is being applied to it. It's the law of inertia, remember? "The vis insita, or innate force of matter is a power of resisting, by which every body, as much as in it lies, endeavors to preserve in its present state, whether it be of rest, or of moving uniformly forward in a straight line." So, in that case, the equation governing the motion of a body is a simple 1 degree polynomial, resulting indeed in a straigh line graph. In face of a force applying to a body, either accelerating or desaccelerating it, the polynomial turns to degree 2, resulting in a curve. Sadly a setting in which there are no forces at all applying to a body is an *idealized setting*: it doesn't correspond to reality, it simply doesn't exist. Here on Earth there's friction and in space there's always, always a gravitational pull from some body around, no matter how weak. The result of motion here is always a polynomial with degree beyond 1, meaning a curve, however slight it is... Straight lines are a math abstraction, not a physical property, sorry. **Get your head out of the books long enough to breathe, sir. Those books aren't exactly sacred texts, you know. And if they were, scientists would reject them for that very reason. what are you even saying, troll? Did you even grasp anything I told you? forget... -- a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EARTH IS the Black Hole of the Universe !!!! | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 3rd 06 07:09 PM |
EARTH IS the Black Hole of the Universe !!!! | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 3rd 06 07:05 PM |
Purpose of a Black Hole in an Organized Universe | William Elliot | Science | 8 | April 12th 04 09:36 AM |
Universe Born in Black Hole Explosion? | Klaatu | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | September 21st 03 12:12 AM |
Universe Born in Black Hole Explosion? | Klaatu | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 17th 03 09:54 PM |