![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What gives the Universe all the room to have enormous (or infinite)
space? It had to come from somewhere! What is the origin of all the matter/energy in the universe? It had to come from somewhere! If the universe has infinite size, does it also have infinite energy? What created that? Good grief, I know these are fundamental problems of cosmology but it still drives me absolutely insane. I have a few cosmology books here in the house, but they seem to tiptoe around a lot of these issues and delve into other stuff, such as redshift and different rehashes of what happened in the first second of the Big Bang. I guess it wouldn't be proper for these books to speculate, which is understandable, but I'd at least like to read an inkling of speculation. The idea of ANYTHING growing out of an absolute vacuum, no matter what the circumstances are, is so counterintuitive it is insane. The Universe shouldn't even exist! Aghh!! More fodder to contemplate during my next observing night. PTM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2003 04:00:23 -0700, MrGrytt wrote:
Pretty tough thing to contemplate, for sure. Actually, the fact that even one atom exists is amazing enough to drive a person nuts. Big Bang, so what? Where did the material come from to start with? HG Virtual particles! (?) Lawrence Sayre -- My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a moral being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Ayn Rand (in the appendix to 'Atlas Shrugged') |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Powdered Toast Man wrote:
.........The idea of ANYTHING growing out of an absolute vacuum, no matter what the circumstances are, is so counterintuitive it is insane. The Universe shouldn't even exist! Aghh!! More fodder to contemplate during my next observing night. As Allan Sandage said: "Why is there something instead of nothing?" If you think really hard about this, you will hurt your brain. Seriously, I am confident that a scientist, or more likely a team of scientists, will figure this out. In the meantime, have fun observing! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2003 12:16:40 GMT, Brian Sturges hotmail.com wrote:
PTM, have you considered the world view described in the Holy Bible? Years ago, I found that the Lord is very real and loves to become a part of our personal lives. This made a lot of things fall into place for me- including the creation of the universe. Of course, Genesis only records the few thousand years of human history since it only sets out to lay the groundwork for the plan of human salvation. But the infinite, eternal Creator is very capable of creating "something from nothing" and modern science does not contradict the historical and philosophical ideas found in the Bible. Brian Your answer introduces a significant level of additional complexities which also border on (or perhaps more correctly: define) cosmological insanity. Doesn't your arguement simply shift the topic of this discussion (that being "Where did everything come from in the first place?") from "Cosmological Insanity" to "Philosophical (or Religious) Insanity"? Your answer begs the reduction to the age old question of "Who created the creator?". It is a very weak arguement to sluff this off by simply defining your creator as one who has always existed (and has always been all knowing, all powerfull, etc...), and then attempt to circumvent all of the current mathematical problems of cosmology [which stem from the reduction to "infinities", as exist in most of the mathematical solutions, when pressed to explain the first moments of time, black holes [beyond the event horizon particularly], etc...) by asserting this "infinity of the most infinite proportions" (I.E. God, [my definition]) as a mear fact beyond any question or explanation. In the search for cosmological truth, the insanity always appears to begin where the "infinities" are to be found, and this is the basis upon which I stake the first sentence in this paragraph. Much of todays expansion of knowledge in the realm of cosmological beginnings is happening (or will happen) because mathematical theories are arrising (such as Superstrings and the M-Theory") which will not reduce to the level of "infinity" (absurdity if you like) for any solution which can be dervied from them, and which satisfy all of the known criteria with which they can be tested. When the understanding which we will ultimately derive from the mathematics of Superstring and/or the M-Theory (or something more fumdimental) begins to filter down to our level of practical existence (as was the case in the not too distant past when general relativity and quantum mechanics resulted in such things as nuclear energy, lasers, microwave ovens, X-Rays, CT Scanners, MRI, etc...) one can only imagine (or to be more true to this point in our understanding, can not yet imagine at all) the wonders of discovery, and the benefits to mankind that will certainly blossom forth as a result! However, when one mires in the knowledge of myth as fact, the benefit that results generally tends to be a bit less by comparison. An interesting challenge indeed would be to list the practical benefits to mankind that have been derived (solely) from an intimate relationship with a god. Lawrence Sayre -- My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a moral being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Ayn Rand (in the appendix to 'Atlas Shrugged') |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bwhiting wrote:
hey Toast, look at it this way, and I realize I am trying to be practical but not necessarily scientific. We know that the vaccuum has an awful lot of 'potential' energy; in science class, have you ever seen the two iron hemi-spheres placed together, then the air removed from them with an air pump? 4 sets of horses on each end cannot pull the two hemispheres apart with a vacuum inside them. Kind of proving here that a perfect vaccuum must have a lot of potential energy. Sorry, but the vacuum itself has no potential energy. It's potential is zero, it is the air pressure outside (i.e. at a higher potential) that produces the potential energy. The PE level is [Patm-Pvac(=0)]*volume. The force capacity is only one element of the potential energy. One could generate the same force with almost zero potenital energy (e.g. two nearly flat disks with a good edge seal). Take your vacuum sphere into space and it couldn't stop a fly (assuming a fly could fly in space) ;-) Bryan So, picture a Perfect Void which existed prior to the Big Bang, loaded with lots of potential energy....this Void was not the normal space-time continuum that we live in today....it was a Perfect Vacuum. (Our normal space today is not a perfect vaccuum...radio waves, neutrino's flitting about, x-rays, gamma rays, hydrogen atoms, dust, etc) And in my mind, it was an unstable Perfect Vaccuum, needing only the slightest quantum fluctuation on the sub-microscopic level, to unleash all that potential energy. We have no idea what the 'structure' of this Perfect Void was, but somehow, evidently, a major quantum fluctuation occurred that released all that pent up energy from the Perfect Void, and that quantum fluctuation, or the results of it, we call the Big Bang. So in this humble layman's view, you are not really getting something from nothing, you are simply converting potential energy to kinetic energy. Lots of it. Clear Skies, Tom Whiting Powdered Toast Man wrote: What gives the Universe all the room to have enormous (or infinite) space? It had to come from somewhere! What is the origin of all the matter/energy in the universe? It had to come from somewhere! If the universe has infinite size, does it also have infinite energy? What created that? Good grief, I know these are fundamental problems of cosmology but it still drives me absolutely insane. I have a few cosmology books here in the house, but they seem to tiptoe around a lot of these issues and delve into other stuff, such as redshift and different rehashes of what happened in the first second of the Big Bang. I guess it wouldn't be proper for these books to speculate, which is understandable, but I'd at least like to read an inkling of speculation. The idea of ANYTHING growing out of an absolute vacuum, no matter what the circumstances are, is so counterintuitive it is insane. The Universe shouldn't even exist! Aghh!! More fodder to contemplate during my next observing night. PTM |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2003 12:16:40 GMT, "Brian Sturges"
wrote: PTM, have you considered the world view described in the Holy Bible? Why trade one totally non-intuitive and fantastical viewpoint for another? At least there is tangible evidence for the cosmological theories under discussion here. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To quote one of my professors: "if it was simple then any fool could
understand it"! Del Johnson "Powdered Toast Man" wrote in message om... What gives the Universe all the room to have enormous (or infinite) space? It had to come from somewhere! What is the origin of all the matter/energy in the universe? It had to come from somewhere! If the universe has infinite size, does it also have infinite energy? What created that? Good grief, I know these are fundamental problems of cosmology but it still drives me absolutely insane. I have a few cosmology books here in the house, but they seem to tiptoe around a lot of these issues and delve into other stuff, such as redshift and different rehashes of what happened in the first second of the Big Bang. I guess it wouldn't be proper for these books to speculate, which is understandable, but I'd at least like to read an inkling of speculation. The idea of ANYTHING growing out of an absolute vacuum, no matter what the circumstances are, is so counterintuitive it is insane. The Universe shouldn't even exist! Aghh!! More fodder to contemplate during my next observing night. PTM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |
Planck's Cosmology | Innes Johnson | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 30th 03 04:08 PM |
Steinhardt-Turok cosmology | Trakar | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 9th 03 08:47 PM |