![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " George" wrote in message .. . http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2943M2M1.JPG Incredible! The spheres at the Spirit site appear as dunes, but there are several pics showing sizable rocks on top of the these dunes. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2532R1M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389R2M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389L5M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P1635R0M1.HTML And what the 'ell is this? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389R2M1.HTML And does this pic show the spheres are eroding away and uncovering a basalt rock? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2599L2M1.JPG It looks to me the spheres at the Spirit site are different, they seem less uniformly spherical and the broken pieces seem to be missing. They appear more like the spheres eroding out of the sedimentary rock at the Opportunity site. So I would speculate the Spirit spheres are the fossilized version being uncovered by erosion. And in this pic the shapes appear to be determined by contact with each other, especially in the upper left. Where a couple are u-shaped around another. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2943M2M1.JPG I think this puts a big damper on the idea they formed in the atmosphere as fallout, but more likely underwater. The dunes at the Spirit site might be from ancient wave action, not wind. These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Jonathan s |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jonathan" wrote in message ... " George" wrote in message .. . http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2943M2M1.JPG Incredible! The spheres at the Spirit site appear as dunes, but there are several pics showing sizable rocks on top of the these dunes. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2532R1M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389R2M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389L5M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P1635R0M1.HTML And what the 'ell is this? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...P2389R2M1.HTML And does this pic show the spheres are eroding away and uncovering a basalt rock? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2599L2M1.JPG It looks to me the spheres at the Spirit site are different, they seem less uniformly spherical and the broken pieces seem to be missing. They appear more like the spheres eroding out of the sedimentary rock at the Opportunity site. So I would speculate the Spirit spheres are the fossilized version being uncovered by erosion. And in this pic the shapes appear to be determined by contact with each other, especially in the upper left. Where a couple are u-shaped around another. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...6P2943M2M1.JPG I think this puts a big damper on the idea they formed in the atmosphere as fallout, but more likely underwater. The dunes at the Spirit site might be from ancient wave action, not wind. These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Jonathan Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " George" wrote in message .. . Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? Perhaps I should be asking you. The dunes made of spheres at the Spirit site are clearly ancient, else they wouldn't have rocks on top. So the spheres must have cemented them in place. Nasa picked this site due to the evidence it was an ancient lake. Have you even looked at the pics? Jonathan s |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
February 15, 2004
George wrote: These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? It isn't all that far fetched. http://www-curator.jsc.nasa.gov/cura...rchForLife.htm Look at the structure of the globules. While they are smaller by an order of magnitude, and flattened, as a result of their formation in very narrow fractures and fissures, they have the basic structure, an inner precipitate, and an iron rich outer coating. Perhaps the spherules are just the final result of a process where the biogenic precipitation process is allowed to complete its cycle. Certainly there is evidence now for a biogenic origin of terrestrial banded iron formations. Whether or not the spherules rain out of a water vapor and mineral rich sky, or out of a water and mineral rich surface, is almost irrelevant. Precipitation is required for mineral rich ice sheet formation, and this is what I see here. Regardless, this indicates a very wet Mars in the distant past, and a very icy Mars in the present. Jonathon obviously has the details wrong, but the idea is worthy of examination. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Jonathan They are Blue at spirit site too ! http://mars.gh.wh.uni-dortmund.de/me...4L5L7.jpg.html More colors here http://mars.gh.wh.uni-dortmund.de/mer/ Enjoy, ERic |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jonathan" wrote in message ... " George" wrote in message .. . Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? Perhaps I should be asking you. The dunes made of spheres at the Spirit site are clearly ancient, else they wouldn't have rocks on top. The presence of rocks on top of anything has nothing to do with how old they are. However, I will agree with you that they are very old, but for entirely different reasons. So the spheres must have cemented them in place. How so? Nasa picked this site due to the evidence it was an ancient lake. Have you even looked at the pics? Well yeah, since I posted the link to them. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message ... February 15, 2004 George wrote: These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? It isn't all that far fetched. http://www-curator.jsc.nasa.gov/cura...rchForLife.htm Look at the structure of the globules. While they are smaller by an order of magnitude, and flattened, as a result of their formation in very narrow fractures and fissures, they have the basic structure, an inner precipitate, and an iron rich outer coating. Perhaps the spherules are just the final result of a process where the biogenic precipitation process is allowed to complete its cycle. You could certainly try to make that case, although based on what evidence that the ROVER has collected, I have no idea. Based on the evidence that the rover has thus far collected, it is far more likely that the spherules are simply volcanic/impact related. In fact, I think it is far more likely that this is the case. Certainly there is evidence now for a biogenic origin of terrestrial banded iron formations. No doubt. But that is not what we are talking about here. Whether or not the spherules rain out of a water vapor and mineral rich sky, or out of a water and mineral rich surface, is almost irrelevant. Precipitation is required for mineral rich ice sheet formation, and this is what I see here. Regardless, this indicates a very wet Mars in the distant past, and a very icy Mars in the present. So where's the ICE? Jonathon obviously has the details wrong, but the idea is worthy of examination. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net I would recommend that you read the following article. It is worthwhile, and addresses some of the same issues: http://www.space.com/missionlaunches...es_040211.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Pouhier" wrote in message ... These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Jonathan They are Blue at spirit site too ! Color is irrelevant to proving that the spherules are alive!!! http://mars.gh.wh.uni-dortmund.de/me...4L5L7.jpg.html More colors here http://mars.gh.wh.uni-dortmund.de/mer/ Enjoy, ERic |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jonathan" wrote in message ... " George" wrote in message .. . http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EFF0506P2943M2 M1.JPG Incredible! The spheres at the Spirit site appear as dunes, but there are several pics showing sizable rocks on top of the these dunes. I will admit that the first time I saw that image I was shocked that there appeared to be spherules at both sites. And in greater quantities at the Spirit site. However, The "spheres" at the Spirit site are anything but. Only a few are remotely as spherical as the spherules seen at the Opportunity site. These appear to be pebbles which have been tumbled in a fluid and then deposited there. They may not even be the same materials. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EFF0514P2532R1 M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EDN0400P2389R2 M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EDN0400P2389L5 M1.HTML http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EFF0400P1635R0 M1.HTML And what the 'ell is this? http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EDN0400P2389R2 M1.HTML And does this pic show the spheres are eroding away and uncovering a basalt rock? It more likely shows that the dunes flowed in around pre-existing basaltic rocks. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EFF0506P2599L2 M1.JPG It looks to me the spheres at the Spirit site are different, they seem less uniformly spherical and the broken pieces seem to be missing. Different from what? They appear more like the spheres eroding out of the sedimentary rock at the Opportunity site. That's why I asked - different from what? Where else on Mars have you seen spheres - other than the Opportunity site? So I would speculate the Spirit spheres are the fossilized version being uncovered by erosion. Speculate all you want. The dunes came in after the rocks. What appear to be rocks sitting on the dunes could just as easily be embedded rocks. Appearences can be deceiving. And in this pic the shapes appear to be determined by contact with each other, especially in the upper left. Where a couple are u-shaped around another. Which makes them even less likely to be the same as the spherules at the Oppoutunity site. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/galle...EFF0506P2943M2 M1.JPG I think this puts a big damper on the idea they formed in the atmosphere as fallout, but more likely underwater. The dunes at the Spirit site might be from ancient wave action, not wind. Possible, perhaps even likely, but not necessary. They could have formed under water elsewhere and have been deposited in that location another way. These are life forms, I'm more convinced every day. Nonetheless, they are more likely to turn out to be tumbled basaltic pebbles at the Spirit site. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jonathan" wrote in message ... " George" wrote in message .. . Nuts. How old are you, Johnathan? Perhaps I should be asking you. The dunes made of spheres at the Spirit site are clearly ancient, else they wouldn't have rocks on top. None of the rocks in the images you presented are necessarily sitting on top of the dunes. So the spheres must have cemented them in place. It remains to be seen if the dunes are cemented in place or that they cement anything else in place. Nasa picked this site due to the evidence it was an ancient lake. Have you even looked at the pics? Jonathan s |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |