Why do I get the feeling it's not Earth but another planet

Why do I get the feeling, the few photos from the planet that shows
trees, are not Earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlUlP4JUx6Y

When did you ever look up and see starscapes like that from Earth?

IF someone on Earth had achieved seeing starscapes like that from
Earth, and photoed it, it would have been well known as soon as it
happened.

I think this person with this YouTube account that posted this knows
someone (or he is him) that owns a flying saucer, went to another
planet, photoed those starscapes or "galaxy starscapes" from whatever
planet they were on, and simply put them up on YouTube.

Its kind of like Hubble telescope, most photos we see are claimed to
have come from Hubble, but did not were taken from flying saucers that
NASA has out in the "field", and Hubble is the scapegoat as being the
source.

Hubble telescope probably doesn't even exist, knowing that flying
saucers do and they refuse to disclose this to the public seeing how
it's our property by our tax dollar funding NASA and NASA stole them
from me, I mean Hitler, they use their flying saucer to give us photos
from billions of light years away, but have to due to supremacy
complex keep us dumb to the flying saucer technology existing, so have
to have Hubble to claim the source.

Did I cover this enough with details for you peppercorn brains?

There's no way a telescope can see through other galaxies to see
galaxies 200 million light years away. 40 million light years away is
impossible, because Hubble cannot see through stardust cosmic clouds
storms planets stars astroids moons suns dark matter, Hubble has about
10 light years maximum of seeing if that.

Hubble is a stratagem, a stooge, for the flying saucers that are
really the source of photos we have been given such as in this video.

On May 27, 1:10*am, LIBERATOR wrote:
Why do I get the feeling, the few photos from the planet that shows
trees, are not Earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlUlP4JUx6Y

When did you ever look up and see starscapes like that from Earth?

IF someone on Earth had achieved seeing starscapes like that from
Earth, and photoed it, it would have been well known as soon as it
happened.

I think this person with this YouTube account that posted this knows
someone (or he is him) that owns a flying saucer, went to another
planet, photoed those starscapes or "galaxy starscapes" from whatever
planet they were on, and simply put them up on YouTube.

Its kind of like Hubble telescope, most photos we see are claimed to
have come from Hubble, but did not were taken from flying saucers that
NASA has out in the "field", and Hubble is the scapegoat as being the
source.

Hubble telescope probably doesn't even exist, knowing that flying
saucers do and they refuse to disclose this to the public seeing how
it's our property by our tax dollar funding NASA and NASA stole them
from me, I mean Hitler, they use their flying saucer to give us photos
from billions of light years away, but have to due to supremacy
complex keep us dumb to the flying saucer technology existing, so have
to have Hubble to claim the source.

Did I cover this enough with details for you peppercorn brains?

There's no way a telescope can see through other galaxies to see
galaxies 200 million light years away. 40 million light years away is
impossible, because Hubble cannot see through stardust cosmic clouds
storms planets stars astroids moons suns dark matter, Hubble has about
10 light years maximum of seeing if that.

Hubble is a stratagem, a stooge, for the flying saucers that are
really the source of photos we have been given such as in this video.

Uh oh, was I wrong about Hubble?

This is a home telescope. Obviously that he can see them but with
limited clarity, Hubble as it's out in space and has gazillion the
times of magnification of this home telescope, perhaps I'm wrong about
Hubble.

Or I'm right half way, both Hubble is used and can see far away, but
is also used to be claimed as a resource for what flying saucers with
photographic data provide. So some of the data from Hubble is actual
but also some is said to be from Hubble but didn't come from it but
came from flying saucers.

Like that giant space station with a population of 50,000. They got
giant telescopes on there and huge flying saucer ports.

On May 27, 1:36*am, LIBERATOR wrote:
On May 27, 1:10*am, LIBERATOR wrote:





Why do I get the feeling, the few photos from the planet that shows
trees, are not Earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlUlP4JUx6Y

When did you ever look up and see starscapes like that from Earth?

IF someone on Earth had achieved seeing starscapes like that from
Earth, and photoed it, it would have been well known as soon as it
happened.

I think this person with this YouTube account that posted this knows
someone (or he is him) that owns a flying saucer, went to another
planet, photoed those starscapes or "galaxy starscapes" from whatever
planet they were on, and simply put them up on YouTube.

Its kind of like Hubble telescope, most photos we see are claimed to
have come from Hubble, but did not were taken from flying saucers that
NASA has out in the "field", and Hubble is the scapegoat as being the
source.

Hubble telescope probably doesn't even exist, knowing that flying
saucers do and they refuse to disclose this to the public seeing how
it's our property by our tax dollar funding NASA and NASA stole them
from me, I mean Hitler, they use their flying saucer to give us photos
from billions of light years away, but have to due to supremacy
complex keep us dumb to the flying saucer technology existing, so have
to have Hubble to claim the source.

Did I cover this enough with details for you peppercorn brains?

There's no way a telescope can see through other galaxies to see
galaxies 200 million light years away. 40 million light years away is
impossible, because Hubble cannot see through stardust cosmic clouds
storms planets stars astroids moons suns dark matter, Hubble has about
10 light years maximum of seeing if that.

Hubble is a stratagem, a stooge, for the flying saucers that are
really the source of photos we have been given such as in this video.

Uh oh, was I wrong about Hubble?

This is a home telescope. Obviously that he can see them but with
limited clarity, Hubble as it's out in space and has gazillion the
times of magnification of this home telescope, perhaps I'm wrong about
Hubble.

Or I'm right half way, both Hubble is used and can see far away, but
is also used to be claimed as a resource for what flying saucers with
photographic data provide. So some of the data from Hubble is actual
but also some is said to be from Hubble but didn't come from it but
came from flying saucers.

Like that giant space station with a population of 50,000. They got
giant telescopes on there and huge flying saucer ports.- Hide quoted text -


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGzKy...eature=related

Probably because of the groups its posted to, perhaps?
Pity, we don't get enough raving loonies these days.
Brian

--
Brian Gaff -
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"LIBERATOR" wrote in message
...
Why do I get the feeling, the few photos from the planet that shows
trees, are not Earth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlUlP4JUx6Y

When did you ever look up and see starscapes like that from Earth?

IF someone on Earth had achieved seeing starscapes like that from
Earth, and photoed it, it would have been well known as soon as it
happened.

I think this person with this YouTube account that posted this knows
someone (or he is him) that owns a flying saucer, went to another
planet, photoed those starscapes or "galaxy starscapes" from whatever
planet they were on, and simply put them up on YouTube.

Its kind of like Hubble telescope, most photos we see are claimed to
have come from Hubble, but did not were taken from flying saucers that
NASA has out in the "field", and Hubble is the scapegoat as being the
source.

Hubble telescope probably doesn't even exist, knowing that flying
saucers do and they refuse to disclose this to the public seeing how
it's our property by our tax dollar funding NASA and NASA stole them
from me, I mean Hitler, they use their flying saucer to give us photos
from billions of light years away, but have to due to supremacy
complex keep us dumb to the flying saucer technology existing, so have
to have Hubble to claim the source.

Did I cover this enough with details for you peppercorn brains?

There's no way a telescope can see through other galaxies to see
galaxies 200 million light years away. 40 million light years away is
impossible, because Hubble cannot see through stardust cosmic clouds
storms planets stars astroids moons suns dark matter, Hubble has about
10 light years maximum of seeing if that.

Hubble is a stratagem, a stooge, for the flying saucers that are
really the source of photos we have been given such as in this video.

On 27 May, 16:12, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
Probably because of the groups its posted to, perhaps?
Pity, we don't get enough raving loonies these days.
Brian

Libby is the AMR certified loon. Most of us have him plonked and only
his Xposted replies show up.
Feel free to catch up with his latest theories though.

Liberator,

Are you are real crazy person or are you just pretending to be crazy to
get attention? If you are pretending you are doing an excellent job.