![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And never the twines to meet. They don't relate well to each other.
Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Waves are made of particles and everything has waves.
I like your posts Bert, they're often fun to read. I constantly make spelling errors, gramer errors and much worse; my posts are damn near impossible for others to understand at times. That said.. I think you meant to say: “ Never the twain shall meet. â€. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 11:35Â*am, wrote:
Waves are made of particles and everything has waves. I like your posts Bert, they're often fun to read. I constantly make spelling errors, gramer errors and much worse; my posts are damn near impossible for others to understand at times. That said.. I think you meant to say: “ Never the twain shall meet.. â€. Wich came first? The particle of the wave? Double-A |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The comos is perfectly causal ( i.e. it's 4-D );
so it never changes and nothing “ came first †( i.e. nothing's 3-D ). From ignorance comes the notion of “ randomness †( sub 3-D ) and the sensation that something “ came first †( 3-D ). Semi-Randomness is just semi-ignorance. Louis de Broglie showed that the wavelength of anything, including the earth and your body, is: Planck's constant over momentum. Quoting WikiPedia: “ Whether objects heavier than the Planck mass ( about the weight of a large bacterium ) have a de Broglie wavelength is theoretically unclear and experimentally unreachable; above the Planck mass a particle's Compton wavelength would be smaller than the Planck length and its own Schwarzschild radius, a scale at which current theories of physics may break down or need to be replaced by more general ones. â€. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Twain it is. Like when my posts can make a person laugh. I like
gamma better than grammar. That is not hard to figure. Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-A The particle came first because all particles have a wave
behind them Shall we relate that to a ships "stern wave"? or is the wave up front and we can relate that to a ships bow wave.?? Waves are tricky stuff My spin is in theory tells me the wave is perpendicular.alway to the direction an electron is going Go figure Bert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wrote: “ gramer â€. At least I didn't spell it “ graaamer †!
Thanks for spelling the word “ grammar †for me. Dictionary.COM fooled me.. it returned the definition of the word grammar when I entered “ gramer â€. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use Yahoo's search engine for spellings, Jeff. It works fine IF YOU
HAVE SOME INTELLIGENCE TO START WITH! lmao! Saul Levy On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:38:42 +0000 (UTC), wrote: I wrote: “ gramer ”. At least I didn't spell it “ graaamer ” ! Thanks for spelling the word “ grammar ” for me. Dictionary.COM fooled me.. it returned the definition of the word grammar when I entered “ gramer ”. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the micro realm particles can't touch,but their waves do.
Interference patterns shown to us clearly proves this Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wave On a Pond | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 18 | October 13th 07 10:04 PM |
Light Clock,and wave lengths ?? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 1 | June 27th 07 01:57 AM |
Important find:when is the light wave-motion ?and when is | xszxsz | Misc | 1 | November 11th 04 06:13 PM |
SUPERNOVA SHOCK WAVE IS PRODUCING A SPECTACULAR NEW LIGHT SHOW(STScI-PRC04-09) | INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT | Hubble | 0 | February 22nd 04 04:01 AM |
Linking the Universes Both Macro and Micro | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | January 24th 04 09:56 PM |