![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed
was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? Blue skies . . . John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote in message oups.com... Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). Jup heard that too :-) "Wait a minute - that can't be right" kinda moment ;-) I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? True enough - later on I heard him say that altitude was 64000 miles I think it was but he caught that one right away and corrected himself :-) /J |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jesper Thomsen" wrote in message ... "John" wrote in message oups.com... Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). Jup heard that too :-) "Wait a minute - that can't be right" kinda moment ;-) I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? True enough - later on I heard him say that altitude was 64000 miles I think it was but he caught that one right away and corrected himself :-) /J Yeah, I caught both of those. George |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Dec 2006 23:34:09 -0800, "John" wrote:
Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? Blue skies . . . John I'm not sure what mistakes were really made by the PAO. I had the Nasa feed on my PC (56K modem so lousy picture) and was switching between Fox, CNN, and another station on the TV for a good picture. Different things were happening on different feeds. I suspect everyone along the chain was worried about something bad happening and inserted their own delays so you had delays piled on top of delays. At least one of them seemed to have delayed the picture but not the sound. They had the PAO calling events well before the video showed them happening. One network had a scroll across the bottom which had the shuttle going 4000+ MPH very shortly after lift-off. I think the picture and/or PAO voice on that channel had the vehicle just having gone supersonic. Does anyone know what the feed was like on Nasa Select viewed directly on satellite? -- David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John" wrote in message oups.com... Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? Blue skies . . . You heard right. I thought the same. I was watching/listening on my PC. We all make mistakes. Will ------------------------------------ UK - Scotland |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, we all make mistakes, but it seems that the quality of the
commentary is going slightly south. My son was watching with me the other day and we counted the "uh"'s and it was terrible. Each time they would talk we could count at least 10-12. We are all human, but these guys get paid for this stuff! I am not a big fan of the PAO. I really think that if NASA were better publicized that it would be much better funded. I never see a commercial about what NASA has given to the world. A good PR campaign would do wonders. I wonder what their budget is and what they use it for? Just my 2 cents. Jim "William Gordon" wrote in message ... "John" wrote in message oups.com... Was it me . . . or did I hear the PAO announce that the vehicle's speed was 1,000 mph at some point just after the stack completed roll program? It was at some point less than T+ 60 seconds and it was before the typical PAO call that the engines were throttling down in a 3 step fashion to minimize maximum dynamic pressure (as the vehicle approachs and passes through Mach 1). I am not harshing on the guy . . . we are all human . . . mistakes get made. I just wondered if I really heard him right? Blue skies . . . You heard right. I thought the same. I was watching/listening on my PC. We all make mistakes. Will ------------------------------------ UK - Scotland |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pluto / New Horizons Launch / Post Launch News Conference | John | Space Shuttle | 1 | January 20th 06 08:09 PM |
International Launch Services And Lockheed Martin Launch Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter For NASA | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | August 12th 05 03:21 PM |
Sea Launch wins Multiple Launch Award with PanAmSat - Agreement includes first Land Launch mission | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | July 29th 05 03:59 PM |
NASA Delays First Post-Columbia Launch. New launch date for Discovery is May 22 | Andrew | Space Shuttle | 4 | April 22nd 05 03:11 AM |
NASA chooses ILS Atlas V launch vehicle to launch Solar Dynamics Observatory | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | October 1st 04 07:02 PM |