Universe's Missing Matter = Gravity Needed

Seems like a very hard question. Like all hard questions the answer is
very simple. Bohr,and Einstein had this in common. "If the answer is not
short and simple the chances are it is wrong" I believe that. My answer
to missing matter needed to give the universe its complete gravitation
force is "Hydrogen" Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Seems like a very hard question. Like all hard questions the answer is
very simple. Bohr,and Einstein had this in common. "If the answer is not
short and simple the chances are it is wrong" I believe that. My answer
to missing matter needed to give the universe its complete gravitation
force is "Hydrogen" Bert
There is a black hole in the center of Universe maybe?

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Seems like a very hard question. Like all hard questions the answer is
very simple. Bohr,and Einstein had this in common. "If the answer is not
short and simple the chances are it is wrong" I believe that. My answer
to missing matter needed to give the universe its complete gravitation
force is "Hydrogen" Bert


But helium would give 4 times the mass.

Double-A

ivars No maybe about it the universe is shaped like a torus and in the
hole in the middle is a black hole billions of light years in diameter.
It was created like all black holes from the big bangs "implosion" that
was equal to the force of the outer "explosion" that created us and
everything around us. Reality is an explosion and implosion is two
sides to the same coin Explosion (heads) implosion (tails) Bert PS
would come as no surprise to me if the universe's black hole has the
density less than solid helium Go figure This begs the question
Can the universe be 2 billion light years bigger than its age?? Bert

Double-A I was going to say Hydrogen,+ helium. I went with hydrogen
because it was the first element made,and its easy for nature to
manufacture. But I can live with hydrogen and helium,and if that is what
you like best. So be it. Bert

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
ivars No maybe about it the universe is shaped like a torus and in the
hole in the middle is a black hole billions of light years in diameter.
It was created like all black holes from the big bangs "implosion" that
was equal to the force of the outer "explosion" that created us and
everything around us. Reality is an explosion and implosion is two
sides to the same coin Explosion (heads) implosion (tails) Bert PS
would come as no surprise to me if the universe's black hole has the
density less than solid helium Go figure This begs the question
Can the universe be 2 billion light years bigger than its age?? Bert


After the Big Bang there was a period of so-called "Hyper Inflation", at
which the present laws of physics (read: SOL) did not yet apply. Once
things began to clump together, first as atoms, then molecules and finally
the first stars, the combined gravity, which controls the SOL, came into
being.. So yes, the Universe could very easily have expanded by that extra
2 BLY in its first stages.

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Double-A I was going to say Hydrogen,+ helium. I went with hydrogen
because it was the first element made,and its easy for nature to
manufacture. But I can live with hydrogen and helium,and if that is what
you like best. So be it. Bert

can this black hole be like blazar or quazar, with axis along
universe's (if rotating universe).

or. like a tube along axis-falaco soliton type, one in each end?

Hagar(the horrible) I would think Guth would have to go along that the
universe is bigger than its age. It kind of interesting,because it goes
against imperial thinking. I like that Bert

ivar A black hole inside a galaxy,could describe the one inside the core
of the universe(why not??) Wheels within wheels Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
ivar A black hole inside a galaxy,could describe the one inside the core
of the universe(why not??) Wheels within wheels Bert


So how could you determine where the center of the universe is, Bert?

Double-A