![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was playing around with Starry Night Pro 5, and I thought I'd see if
I could determine the exact time of the summer solstice by watching the solar coordinates. With SNP, you can select the sun, bring up an info panel, and then watch the RA and Dec change as you run through the clock time at the speed of your choice. I saw some things that I can't explain, and I hope somebody here can help me. First, in case my problem is with fundamental knowledge, tell me if I'm wrong about any of these assumptions: 1) The solstice occurs when the sun reaches its maximum declination of the year, which should be around 23.5 degrees N. The declination never decreases between the vernal equinox and the summer solstice, and never increases between the summer solstice and the autumnal equinox. 2) The sun's RA at the solstice should be very close to 6 hours, but since the RA is defined by the vernal equinox rather than the solstice, the solstice may not occur at exactly 6 hours. 3) The sun's RA and Dec do not depend on my location, so if I read in an almanac that the solstice occurred on June 21 at 8:26 AM EDT, I need only correct for my time zone, rather than fractions of a time zone (as I would if I were trying to calculate my local sunrise, for example). 4) SNP has two sets of RA/Dec coordinates in its info panel, one labeled J2000, and one labeled JNow. I assume that JNow will be more accurate for current observations. OK, assuming all that is correct, here is what I found. All times are EDT. 1) On June 21, the maximum RA reached was 23 degrees and 26.386 minutes. This was maintained from 2:00 PM to 3:16 PM EDT. The almanac says the solstice should have been at 8:26 AM EDT. 2) When I ran the time backward from there, the declination slowly decreased, but it hit a minimum (when it was 23deg 26.314') that lasted from 2:03 AM to 3:39 AM of June 21, then it began to increase as I went farther back. It peaked at 23deg 26.332' from about 7:37 PM to 8:20 PM of June 20, and steadily decreased as I went earlier than that.. So if SNP is correct, there were three solstices, i.e. a max on both the 20th and 21st, and a local min between them. I could understand if round-off errors produced fluctuations right around the true solstice, but I can't understand a) the absolute max being nearly six hours off the published time, and b) apparently smooth progressions between two maximums nearly a day apart. Any explanations, or pointers to URLs, appreciated. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:22:21 -0700, wrote:
1) The solstice occurs when the sun reaches its maximum declination of the year, which should be around 23.5 degrees N. The declination never decreases between the vernal equinox and the summer solstice, and never increases between the summer solstice and the autumnal equinox. Correct, for half the year. You can include the whoile year by going solstice-to-solstice: the Sun increases in dec from winter solstice to summer solstice, decreases from summer solstice to winter solstice. The appropriate equinoxes occur in between. 2) The sun's RA at the solstice should be very close to 6 hours, but since the RA is defined by the vernal equinox rather than the solstice, the solstice may not occur at exactly 6 hours. True for times off a chart's given epoch. By definition though, 0h is the intersection of the equator and the ecliptic, and the intersections of the ecliptic with the 6, 18, and 12 hour circles mark the equioxes and solstices. 3) The sun's RA and Dec do not depend on my location, so if I read in an almanac that the solstice occurred on June 21 at 8:26 AM EDT, I need only correct for my time zone, rather than fractions of a time zone (as I would if I were trying to calculate my local sunrise, for example). The RA and dec do depend on your location. However, given the diameter of the Earth, it's really, really, miniscule. The solsitces and equinoxes take the alignments of the centers of the bodies. Your parallax off of that will vary. 4) SNP has two sets of RA/Dec coordinates in its info panel, one labeled J2000, and one labeled JNow. I assume that JNow will be more accurate for current observations. Those are the epochs. The great circle equator rotates around the sky as the earth's axis wobbles over 25,600 years. That's enough to cause errors when using large magnifications in telescopes. Typically, standard epocjs are given every 50 years. 1950 was a common epoch until halfway to 2000 (1975), when it became less accurate, but more available because of already-preinted charts. Software can now display wahtever epoch you like, down to real-time (now). OK, assuming all that is correct, here is what I found. All times are EDT. 1) On June 21, the maximum RA reached was 23 degrees and 26.386 minutes. This was maintained from 2:00 PM to 3:16 PM EDT. The almanac says the solstice should have been at 8:26 AM EDT. 2) When I ran the time backward from there, the declination slowly decreased, but it hit a minimum (when it was 23deg 26.314') that lasted from 2:03 AM to 3:39 AM of June 21, then it began to increase as I went farther back. It peaked at 23deg 26.332' from about 7:37 PM to 8:20 PM of June 20, and steadily decreased as I went earlier than that.. So if SNP is correct, there were three solstices, i.e. a max on both the 20th and 21st, and a local min between them. I could understand if round-off errors produced fluctuations right around the true solstice, but I can't understand a) the absolute max being nearly six hours off the published time, and b) apparently smooth progressions between two maximums nearly a day apart. Any explanations, or pointers to URLs, appreciated. Dunno offhand. Difference in epochs? ============= - Dale Gombert (SkySea at aol.com) 122.38W, 47.58N, W. Seattle, WA http://flavorj.com/~skysea |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SkySea wrote:
2) The sun's RA at the solstice should be very close to 6 hours, but since the RA is defined by the vernal equinox rather than the solstice, the solstice may not occur at exactly 6 hours. True for times off a chart's given epoch. By definition though, 0h is the intersection of the equator and the ecliptic, and the intersections of the ecliptic with the 6, 18, and 12 hour circles mark the equioxes and solstices. No, I think the original poster was right: The vernal equinox is at 0h, but the autumnal equinox and the solstices are all based on properties of the ecliptic and the celestial equator. So the autumnal equinox is when the ecliptic crosses the equator going southward, and the solstices are the two points where the Sun's declination is at one of its two extremes. I have no explanation for the bizarre behavior of SNP, though. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Tung wrote:
SkySea wrote: 2) The sun's RA at the solstice should be very close to 6 hours, but since the RA is defined by the vernal equinox rather than the solstice, the solstice may not occur at exactly 6 hours. True for times off a chart's given epoch. By definition though, 0h is the intersection of the equator and the ecliptic, and the intersections of the ecliptic with the 6, 18, and 12 hour circles mark the equioxes and solstices. No, I think the original poster was right: The vernal equinox is at 0h, but the autumnal equinox and the solstices are all based on properties of the ecliptic and the celestial equator. So the autumnal equinox is when the ecliptic crosses the equator going southward, and the solstices are the two points where the Sun's declination is at one of its two extremes. I have no explanation for the bizarre behavior of SNP, though. Sorry I didn't see this post before I finished replying to the original one. The vernal equinox point on the celestial sphere is indeed exactly at RA 0h, Dec 0 deg in equatorial coordinates; latitude 0 deg, longitude 0 deg in ecliptic coordinates. The center of the sun will NOT go through this point in general, because its geocentric latitude is zero only at the instant when the moon is at one of the nodes of its orbit. If the sun's latitude happens to be positive around March 20, it will cross the celestial equator before it hits longitude 0. If the moon's "argument of latitude" is between 90 and 270 deg, it is moving southward in ecliptic coordinates, the earth is moving northward, and the sun's apparent latitude is decreasing. If this situation holds around June 21, the sun's declination will max out before the solstice. Remember, the solstice is defined by ecliptic longitude, not by RA, not by maximum Dec. -- Bill Owen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S. Caro wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote: Good thing I looked this up, as I would have been totally wrong! Explanatory Supplement - Astronomical Almanac 9.211 Equinoxes and Solstices (pg 477) The times of the equinoxes and solstices are *defined* when the Sun's *apparent ecliptic longitude* lambda_s is a multiple of 90°; i.e., it is calculated from f(t) = 0, where f(t) = lambda_s -0°, 90°, 180°, or 270°. Thus in the northern hemisphere, for the spring equinox f(t) = lambda_s, for the summer solstice, f(t) = lambda_s - 90°, for the autumn equinox f(t) = lambda_s - 180° and for the winter solstice f(t) = lambda_s - 270°. At the equinoxes the Sun crosses the equator when the length of the day exceeds the length of the night due to refraction, semidiameter, and parallax of the Sun. At that time the lengths of the day and night are approximately equal everywhere. Does the analemma effect not factor into this ? (Perhaps the math above explains it :-) The analema is a figure 8-shaped plot of the apparent Sun relative to the mean Sun. This curve is sometimes seen on globes, maps and the photography of Dennis di Cicco and most notably, Anthony Ayiomamitis! And it does change slightly over the millennia. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:54:10 -0700, Bill Owen
wrote: The standard definition of the equinoxes and the solstices are actually in terms of the apparent geocentric *longitude* of the sun, not in terms of declination. Summer solstice happens when the sun's geocentric longitude is exactly 90 degrees. (This happens to be equivalent to RA = 6h.) OK, when I looked at that, it happened at 8:15 for my location (w Oregon) and 8:17 for the center of the earth. So that's just nine minutes off the almanac prediction; much better than six hours. Actually the apparent RA and Dec *do* depend on your location, because of both topocentric parallax and topocentric aberration. The latter doesn't affect the declination though. 4) SNP has two sets of RA/Dec coordinates in its info panel, one labeled J2000, and one labeled JNow. I assume that JNow will be more accurate for current observations. JNow is presumably true-of-date coordinates. Yes. The JNow RA was exactly 6 when the Long was exactly 90. The J2000 lagged a bit. The two local maxima in declination are probably caused by topocentric effects. The difference between the declination at those maxima is 0.018' by your reckoning, just over 1". The earth subtends an angle of about 17" as seen from the sun; the difference between geocentric and topocentric coordinates can amount to over 8". Can you set your coordinates to the center of the earth and see what happens? Yes. The max dec was 23deg 26.455', and it happened from 7:39 AM to 8:55 AM EDT, so the 90deg longitude was within that window. I don't see any deviation from an increase before, and a decrease after, the max. So I guess the puzzle is solved. One last thing: As the ecliptic is defined as the mean orbit of the earth-moon barycenter, and as the moon's orbit is inclined 5 deg to the ecliptic, the earth bobs up and down each month, and the sun's ecliptic latitude can reach about 1 arcsec north or south. Add this effect on top of the earth's orbital motion, and you'll see that the sun's maximum declination won't necessarily happen at ecliptic longitude 90 deg (or RA 6h). Likewise, the sun's declination won't be exactly zero at the equinoxes, when the longitude is 0 or 180. -- Bill Owen Thanks for the help. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro] Time (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (3/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:34 PM |
OS/2 word processor: Describe | Double-A | Misc | 108 | April 14th 06 08:29 PM |
[sci.astro] Time (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (3/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:36 AM |
Undergraduates Study Astronomy and Atmospheric Science During Summer Programs at Arecibo | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 25th 05 08:39 PM |
Roger's Non-USENET Questions | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 15 | May 3rd 05 08:31 AM |