![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did anyone make a sighting of 2004 XP14? I had a lot of trouble, mostly
due to the light pollution. It took me a few minutes to find the right star field; I wasn't using PleiadAtlas, so that might have been part of the problem. I started following the asteroid's track at around 1:30 PDT, and it wasn't until about 2:10 that I *think* I saw it. XP14's magnitude was right at the limiting magnitude for a 5-inch scope, at the time, so I really had to push averted vision to the limit. If I did see it, it was moving fast--perhaps faster than I expected. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My older son and I failed to see it with our 10" f/6 dob. We staked out
three spots but for whatever reason were unsuccessful. We found it surprising how early it got light - hven't pulled an all-nighter in some months. However, we had a good time anyway. Dennis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3 of us of us shared a 12" LX200gps and an 8080 refractor and we were
fairly certain that we caught XP14 over a two hour period of time from just before midnight to around 2AM. We were observing in the Oregon Coast range on a ridgeline road called "Drift Creek" elevation at 2900'. It was very faint and an irratic tumbler by my estimate. Only visable for about a second every 5 - 10 minutes or so (not an accurate time by any means). At its brightest, maybe mag 11, but invisable the rest of the time. My hunch is that there is a flat spot that was acting as a reflector. We used three different pieces of software to track and verify XP14's postion - Guide 8, TheSky v6 and Starry Night Pro. Observing conditions were breezy at around 5mph (onshore air flow), clear with modest light pollution to the east (Hillsboro, Beaverton, Portland). A larger scope would of been nice, but a dob would of had trouble tracking in the breeze. Dennis Woos wrote: My older son and I failed to see it with our 10" f/6 dob. We staked out three spots but for whatever reason were unsuccessful. We found it surprising how early it got light - hven't pulled an all-nighter in some months. However, we had a good time anyway. Dennis |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tmnathe wrote:
It was very faint and an irratic tumbler by my estimate. Only visable for about a second every 5 - 10 minutes or so (not an accurate time by any means). At its brightest, maybe mag 11, but invisable the rest of the time. My hunch is that there is a flat spot that was acting as a reflector. Interesting--that was my experience. I had just two moments when I thought I might have seen it, and it seemed to flash into visibility for a brief moment, and when I tried to confirm, I couldn't see it. But of course that doesn't prove that I saw it; for all I know, it could have been a random piece of junk in my eye. I did see a north-to-south satellite cross the field while I was hunting for XP14. ![]() -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow Brian, we must of saw a simular satellite! We counted at least
three polar satellites pass through the field of view during the night. Got very confusing at one point for me when I had a solid lock on XP14 and zip goes a satellite throwing my eye off and loosing the asteroid. I'm starting to see reports from our other club members who tracked XP14 with larger equipment and from fixed sites. They were able to track the asteroid for extended periods. Tom ![]() Brian Tung wrote: tmnathe wrote: It was very faint and an irratic tumbler by my estimate. Only visable for about a second every 5 - 10 minutes or so (not an accurate time by any means). At its brightest, maybe mag 11, but invisable the rest of the time. My hunch is that there is a flat spot that was acting as a reflector. Interesting--that was my experience. I had just two moments when I thought I might have seen it, and it seemed to flash into visibility for a brief moment, and when I tried to confirm, I couldn't see it. But of course that doesn't prove that I saw it; for all I know, it could have been a random piece of junk in my eye. I did see a north-to-south satellite cross the field while I was hunting for XP14. ![]() -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Wow Brian, we must of saw a simular satellite! We counted at least three polar satellites pass through the field of view during the night. Got very confusing at one point for me when I had a solid lock on XP14 and zip goes a satellite throwing my eye off and loosing the asteroid. I'm starting to see reports from our other club members who tracked XP14 with larger equipment and from fixed sites. They were able to track the asteroid for extended periods. Tom ![]() Did anyone get any photos? George |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At best it was hazy and partly cloudy in metro philly so I just said the heck with it. Would be nice if we could "order" ![]() winter..long nights and better chance of clearer sky ![]() "Murray's Law": If it's Astronomical, it's a good bet it will be cloudy or not visible or something at least a good bit of the time. Once in a while however, if you keep watching, you will see something! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We had a camera with us that might of worked, but the breeze was just
bad enough to wiggle the LX200, so we didn't try. This was also a shake down session for doing some occultation work this summer. So we were more interested in getting equipment working and figuring out bugs and kinks then data recording. We're getting set up with a KIWI-OSD system, so that takes a little getting used to. TN ![]() George wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Wow Brian, we must of saw a simular satellite! We counted at least three polar satellites pass through the field of view during the night. Got very confusing at one point for me when I had a solid lock on XP14 and zip goes a satellite throwing my eye off and loosing the asteroid. I'm starting to see reports from our other club members who tracked XP14 with larger equipment and from fixed sites. They were able to track the asteroid for extended periods. Tom ![]() Did anyone get any photos? George |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-07-03, Brian Tung wrote:
Mike Fleenor put this up on his web site: http://www.mikefleenor.com/NEO/2004XP14_200607.htm Bud |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Tung wrote:
Did anyone make a sighting of 2004 XP14? I had a lot of trouble, mostly due to the light pollution. It took me a few minutes to find the right star field; I wasn't using PleiadAtlas, so that might have been part of the problem. I started following the asteroid's track at around 1:30 PDT, and it wasn't until about 2:10 that I *think* I saw it. XP14's magnitude was right at the limiting magnitude for a 5-inch scope, at the time, so I really had to push averted vision to the limit. If I did see it, it was moving fast--perhaps faster than I expected. Cloudy in Salida. :-( Shawn |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AURORA WATCH | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 5th 04 12:21 AM |
Mars Global Surveyor Images - September 2-15, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 15th 04 05:42 PM |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | History | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | History | 0 | March 26th 04 04:05 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |