VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, May 2006

Double-A wrote:
Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Charles D. Bohne wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 08:13:34 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

The least we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.

Rules? What rules?
Their FAQ says that the ballot should not be abused for simple
revenge - and yet all they do is exactly that.

C.


'Tis true.

Double-A

"WHAAAAAAAAAAAA! MOMMY!"

Yes, we all know you're a cry baby, coffee boy Deco. Like the time Sean
spanked you. You cried like a baby for days.

Double-A

Fake Post.

Double-A

Double-A wrote:
Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

Fake Post.

Double-A

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

--

Can't produce the posts, huh Art?

Double-A

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Double-A wrote:
Art Deco wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 03:27:51 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:


Art Deco wrote:
On 31 May 2006 23:06:28 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Forwarded to relevant froups:

Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler wrote:

Here follows the one true ballot for the May 2006 Usenet Kook awards.
Anybody may vote, but your votes may be disqualified, mocked, burnt,
shredded and/or recycled for use as toilet paper at the Vote Wrangler's
discretion if:

* you are a notorious net.kook
* you attempt to vote twice
* you vote anonymously or with an unidentifiable sockpuppet
* you vote for or against yourself
* you vote in a thread other than this one
* you vote in a newsgroup other than AUK without crossposting to AUK
* you follow up to an incomplete or altered version of the ballot
* you have explicitly been disenfranchised by the Vote Wrangler
* you have officially been declared non-existent

Crossposting the complete, unaltered ballot is permitted. You have
until 23:59:59 (11:59:59 PM) UTC on June 7th to cast your votes.

Vote wisely; next time the candidate might be *you*.

See also the "How to Vote" Mini-FAQ for advice:
http://www.netcabal.com/auk/voting.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


BOBO AWARD
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Terry Ortman


KOOK OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Daniel Joseph Min
Dean Roger Ray, a.k.a. "TeslaCoils"
Joey Jimenez, alias "Colonel Jake"
none of the above
abstain


CLUELESS NEWBIE OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Alan Connor
Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
neither of the above
abstain


COWARD OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Dr. Andrew B Chung
Honest John
neither of the above
abstain


LOONEY MAROON AWARD
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

John Lucas
Raymond R Karczewski, a.k.a. "Kazoo teh Convict"
Soc.Men
none of the above
abstain


GOLDEN KILLFILE
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Honest John


JOSEPH BARTLO "PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE" AWARD
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Joseph Bartlo
Russell B Waters
neither of the above
abstain


BOB ALLISAT MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Joey Jimenez, alias "Colonel Jake"
Raymond R Karczewski, a.k.a. "Kazoo teh Convict"
Uni
none of the above
abstain


PALMJOB PADDLE
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Dirk Bruere, Moderator of soc.religion.asatru
Viking of soc.men
neither of the above
abstain


TONY SIDAWAY MEMORIAL "DRAMA QUEEN" AWARD
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Alan Jones
Jayne Kulikauskas
neither of the above
abstain


VICTOR VON FRANKENSTEIN "WEIRD SCIENCE" AWARD
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

tomcat


BUSTED URINAL AWARD
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Brad Guth
Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
Robert Griffin
The Big-8 Management Board
none of the above
abstain


BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG WHISTLE
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Colonel Jake, trained by Pinku-Sensei


VILLAGE IDIOT
(Vote for one, or abstain)

Chuck Lysaght
Kenneth R Pangborn
abstain


HAMMER OF THOR
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

spooge




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy


Honest John is up for two awards, but I can't find his nominating posts
or seconds. Can anybody point me to them?

No. Find them yourself, you lazy asshole(s). LOL


Thanks, Art Deco.

I knew I could count on you!

You bet, Double-An

Sit on it and rotate, Deco.

Double-A

Fake Post.

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?

"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have
had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear
and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

--

Can't produce the posts, huh Art?

Double-A

Of course he can't, he's a LIAR in addition to a COWARD and HYPOCRITE !

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in
message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time
i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on
the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he
ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He
was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.
Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy
to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other
and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all
this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

Ok, what freakazoid would want pedos loose in their newsgroup?

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in
message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time
i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on
the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he
ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He
was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.
Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy
to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other
and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all
this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

Ok, what freakazoid would want pedos loose in their newsgroup?


bobandcarole for one, or is that two?

Double-A