KAL007 Coldwar Mystery

In article , Pat Flannery says...

Fred J. McCall wrote:

:Key words: "F-14A configured like the ones we sold to the Iranians"
:The Iranians could have modified it. I've never seen a photo of one, but
:the Iranians were supposed to have modified their F-14s to carry Hawk
:SAMs in an air to air mode in place of the Phoenix missiles.

Which didn't work for ****, by the way. The AWG-9 in no way gives
guidance to HAWK.

:If they could pull that stunt off,

They couldn't.

:hanging bombs on it would be a piece
f cake by comparison.

And hitting anything with them without ANY kind of air-to-ground
aiming system would take a bloody miracle!

There's much more to strike warfare than just hanging ordnance on the
airplane.

This is almost cruel to do, but look:
http://www.afwing.com/gallery/iran/7.jpg
Here's one in flight with a Hawk on it:
http://www.afwing.com/gallery/iran/6.jpg
I assume they modified the Hawk's homing system so that it worked on the
AWG-9's frequency as a giant SARH missile.


My recollection is that the air-launched HAWK was an air-to-surface
anti-radiation missile. That's a plausible hack, and wouldn't require
any help from the launching aircraft's radar.

It's also irrelevant. There is no such thing as an aircraft you can
point at and say, "not a threat because that model doesn't carry air
to surface ordnance." Modern antiship missiles, in particular, need
very little in the way of integration if you are willing to accept a
bit of risk, and there are a whole lot of aircraft/missile combinations
in service that don't appear in the user's manual for either the aircraft
or the missile.


--
*John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *
*White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *
* for success" *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *

On 6 Feb 2006 13:56:20 -0800, John Schilling
wrote:

snip

5th request

Please quit crossposting this thread to sci.crypt group.

Please remove sci.crypt from newsgroup crosspost list.

Thank you.