![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its
Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be very greatful for any answers on that. Regards, Karol P. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"kvant" wrote in message
oups.com... Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be very greatful for any answers on that. Regards, Karol P. I am not aware that Buran used exterior foam - there are major differences in the main engine placement and layout from US Shuttle and Buran. gb |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are numerous photos of the exterior insulation of the Soviet
shuttle nicked and scarred but don't know if these are the flight article or the test frames (some through transport I understand) but as far as origin of other damage, its a good question...........Doc |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kvant wrote:
Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be very greatful for any answers on that. Regards, Karol P. It only flew the once. Not sure of it did have foam -- Julian Bordas Rockets should land on their tails as God and Heinlein intended |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On the subject of the Energia booster having foam insulation, the
answer is no. For the first two flights, the second of which carried the first Buran orbiter, there was no insulation on the exterior. Postflight photos taken of Buran shows that ice shards broke off the booster tank and struck the Buran thermal tiles, that in a manner disturbingly similar to Columbia, knocked off three tiles on the underside of the orbiter's wing that happened to border the wingtip leading edge reinforced carbon-carbon panels. Had the ice struck about 20 to 30 cm or so higher, it could well have punched a hole in the Buran RCC, and lead to a loss of the vehicle as happened with Columbia. As it was, the loss of the three tiles was in a somewhat less critical area, and the Buran orbiter survived with some thermal damage to the underlying aluminum alloy airframe structure, though exactly how badly damaged has not been revealed in any offical reports that I'am aware of. For the cancelled third flight of Energia, which also would have been the first flight of the second Buran orbiter, the core booster tankage had a number of thermal insulation panels installed. How effective these would have been is unknown, as is their ability to withstand launch forces. -Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() gb wrote: I am not aware that Buran used exterior foam - there are major differences in the main engine placement and layout from US Shuttle and Buran. I would assume that it would have to, as you don't see frost on it when it was launched. Here's a big shot of it with the Buran on top of it- the insulation appears to be attached in the form of individual sheets: http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-8.jpg Pat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On the subject of the Energia booster having foam insulation, the answer is no. For the first two flights, the second of which carried the first Buran orbiter, there was no insulation on the exterior. This photo of the Energia-Polyus seems to show that at least the top of the LOX tank had some sort of insulation on it: http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/6cl-1.jpg here's a shot showing insulation on the nose and top half of the LOX tank with a Buran shuttle attached: http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-29.jpg and here's one with all-around insulation on the LOX tank: http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-8.jpg Assuming that the third picture is of the unlaunched second Buran flight, then the other one could be the first buran flight, and appears to have some sort of spray-on insulation like the Polyus carrier does, at least on the side facing the Shuttle. Pat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure if these would be all reentry related. Note the vertical tail
edge and you have to ask yourself was this a stunt double in Armegeddon? Seriously, what would cause that type of damage?. I'm reminded of when we transported one of the shuttles and the tiles were shredded and ripped off. I wonder if this is the result of rain, but I guess the question then arises, during reentry or transport, would the Russkies have done a reentry through rain? (great site) ............Doc |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Not sure if these would be all reentry related. Note the vertical tail edge and you have to ask yourself was this a stunt double in Armegeddon? Seriously, what would cause that type of damage?. I assume that it overheated and started to disintegrate; the tiles on the sides of the rear body also suffered bad damage like that .. I'm reminded of when we transported one of the shuttles and the tiles were shredded and ripped off. I wonder if this is the result of rain, but I guess the question then arises, during reentry or transport, would the Russkies have done a reentry through rain? (great site) ............Doc Huge website with all sorts of cool stuff on it and very interactive; I spent days going through it and bookmarking all of the interesting pages. Wanna see something neat? Go to this page and start clicking on various parts of that color perspective cutaway drawing: http://www.buran.ru/htm/techno.htm And here are cutaway drawings of an honest-to-God space fighter design: http://www.buran.ru/htm/str126.htm ....and info on the jet powered prototype including some films of its drop tests: http://www.buran.ru/htm/epos.htm Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'04 Report Faulted Application of Shuttle Foam: NY* Article | Laughable! | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 5th 05 08:52 AM |
That Interesting Foam Situation | Cardman | Policy | 5 | July 29th 05 09:24 PM |
NASA Statement on Foam Shedding From External Tank | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 28th 05 05:32 PM |
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) | Stuf4 | History | 8 | September 29th 03 02:23 PM |
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 9 | July 25th 03 08:33 AM |