A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BURAN - Foam shedding or not?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 06, 07:45 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its
Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some
insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if
so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be
very greatful for any answers on that.

Regards,

Karol P.

  #2  
Old January 28th 06, 03:44 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

"kvant" wrote in message
oups.com...
Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its
Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some
insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if
so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be
very greatful for any answers on that.

Regards,

Karol P.


I am not aware that Buran used exterior foam - there are major differences
in the main engine placement and layout from US Shuttle and Buran.

gb


  #3  
Old January 28th 06, 10:37 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

There are numerous photos of the exterior insulation of the Soviet
shuttle nicked and scarred but don't know if these are the flight
article or the test frames (some through transport I understand) but as
far as origin of other damage, its a good question...........Doc

  #4  
Old January 29th 06, 10:49 AM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

kvant wrote:
Could foam shedding affect the Russian shuttle Buran as well? Its
Energia booster also used cryogenic fuel so I presume there was some
insulation. So, was there any possibility of shedding or not? And if
so, was there any possibility of foam shed hitting Buran? I would be
very greatful for any answers on that.

Regards,

Karol P.


It only flew the once. Not sure of it did have foam

--
Julian Bordas
Rockets should land on their tails
as God and Heinlein intended
  #5  
Old January 29th 06, 11:47 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

On the subject of the Energia booster having foam insulation, the
answer is no. For the first two flights, the second of which carried
the first Buran orbiter, there was no insulation on the exterior.
Postflight photos taken of Buran shows that ice shards broke off the
booster tank and struck the Buran thermal tiles, that in a manner
disturbingly similar to Columbia, knocked off three tiles on the
underside of the orbiter's wing that happened to border the wingtip
leading edge reinforced carbon-carbon panels. Had the ice struck about
20 to 30 cm or so higher, it could well have punched a hole in the
Buran RCC, and lead to a loss of the vehicle as happened with Columbia.
As it was, the loss of the three tiles was in a somewhat less critical
area, and the Buran orbiter survived with some thermal damage to the
underlying aluminum alloy airframe structure, though exactly how badly
damaged has not been revealed in any offical reports that I'am aware
of.

For the cancelled third flight of Energia, which also would have been
the first flight of the second Buran orbiter, the core booster tankage
had a number of thermal insulation panels installed. How effective
these would have been is unknown, as is their ability to withstand
launch forces.
-Mike

  #6  
Old January 31st 06, 05:36 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?



gb wrote:

I am not aware that Buran used exterior foam - there are major differences
in the main engine placement and layout from US Shuttle and Buran.



I would assume that it would have to, as you don't see frost on it when
it was launched.
Here's a big shot of it with the Buran on top of it- the insulation
appears to be attached in the form of individual sheets:
http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-8.jpg

Pat
  #8  
Old January 31st 06, 06:57 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?



wrote:

On the subject of the Energia booster having foam insulation, the
answer is no. For the first two flights, the second of which carried
the first Buran orbiter, there was no insulation on the exterior.



This photo of the Energia-Polyus seems to show that at least the top of
the LOX tank had some sort of insulation on it:
http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/6cl-1.jpg
here's a shot showing insulation on the nose and top half of the LOX
tank with a Buran shuttle attached:
http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-29.jpg
and here's one with all-around insulation on the LOX tank:
http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/gub3-8.jpg
Assuming that the third picture is of the unlaunched second Buran
flight, then the other one could be the first buran flight, and appears
to have some sort of spray-on insulation like the Polyus carrier does,
at least on the side facing the Shuttle.

Pat
  #9  
Old January 31st 06, 07:38 PM posted to sci.space.history
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BURAN - Foam shedding or not?

Not sure if these would be all reentry related. Note the vertical tail
edge and you have to ask yourself was this a stunt double in
Armegeddon? Seriously, what would cause that type of damage?. I'm
reminded of when we transported one of the shuttles and the tiles were
shredded and ripped off. I wonder if this is the result of rain, but I
guess the question then arises, during reentry or transport, would the
Russkies have done a reentry through rain? (great site) ............Doc

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'04 Report Faulted Application of Shuttle Foam: NY* Article Laughable! Amateur Astronomy 0 August 5th 05 08:52 AM
That Interesting Foam Situation Cardman Policy 5 July 29th 05 09:24 PM
NASA Statement on Foam Shedding From External Tank Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 July 28th 05 05:32 PM
STS-87 Foam Impact Assessment (reposted) Stuf4 History 8 September 29th 03 02:23 PM
NASA Team Believed Foam Could Not Damage Space Shuttle Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 9 July 25th 03 08:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.