~ * An evening stroll ...

mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges wrote:
In article
ling.holes.between.cubicles.in
.public.toilets,
"Fred" wrote:

Rising Loonie, , whose name means "constipated
lesbian feminist; cares more for trees than people; crap in bed but thinks
he is a stud", expressed:

When some ordinary person in frail physical health drops dead because
you deliberately and relentlessy pushed them to far, you will have
something to worry about.

People think you're sane as long as you say what they expect; and they think
you're insane when you don't say what they expect.


how do you feel that youre insane when you dont say what i expect?

There are many aspects to sanity, competency and capacity. They
can be considered both independently and combination from assorted
perspectives.

You are unspecific.



Legislation already is or will be in place to deal with such an incident.

Will you write things down if you can't remember?







tell me more about what you cant remember

I'll tell you later.

What I am unaware of currently, I might recall or rediscover at some
future moment.

Although I might not know what that is. I currently remember that at
some future time, ... a memory which currently escapes me will be
re-aquired and re-connected.

How can a person know what they don't know ?
How can a person know what they do know ?



arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together

the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed

mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges wrote:


do you have sex with parents each period?

Absolutely not ...

Such an occurance is a punctuated one-time event which contradicts the
rules of grammer, period!

arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together

the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed

Fred wrote:
Rising Loonie, , whose name means "uses food items
during sex; invites friends over to gang-bang his old granny; likes to call
his penis his 'manmeat'", murmured:

When you intrude into another person's life, deliberately, uninvited,
contravening their insistence that you do not do so.

Life is a compromise.
"Whose" COMPROMISE when there is competition is for a common
resource ?



And in the course of such uninvited, resisted intrusion cause injury
accidelntly, deliberately, negilgently or unerringly.


And I'm looking forward to a long, rich, full life.
So you had beter attend to what you do and look out for what is
done to you.


the point being IT DOESN'T MATTER "WHY".

It's a very small circle of people.
Absolutely private.


The intrusion was your perrogative and you persisted regardless.

My parents had sex. Isn't that the way it happens?
Ignorance is bliss.

Your responsibility.
for what you know and are 'aware'

My roommate snoops through my things. I found proof in his closet.

He admires your style at arranging ?


Full stop.

Period.

So now you know.
... and if you can't remember then I have faith that you will recall
it later.

Ignorance is your perrogative.

It is not an excuse.

Rising Loonie, , whose name means "paunchy faggot;
researches symptoms of tumors and serious illnesses then gets symptoms;
skilled at riding cocks up his arse", inflected:

"Whose" COMPROMISE when there is competition is for a common resource?

Compromising is for pussies.

So you had beter attend to what you do and look out for what is done to
you.

What the hell do you think you're doing?

Absolutely private.

What do you say to a sarcastic person?

Ignorance is bliss.

Hot enough for you?

for what you know and are 'aware' He admires your style at arranging?

What possessed you to write this?

So now you know.

I don't need your help, thanks. [Sarcastically]

and if you can't remember then I have faith that you will recall it later.

Why can't I remember then you have faith that I will recall it later,
Loonie?

Ignorance is your perrogative.

Is your girlfriend smart?

It is not an excuse.

Excuses, excuses, excuses.

mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges wrote:
In article ,
"Fred" wrote:

Rising Loonie, , whose name means "cannot
understand why nobody else masturbates in public; pinches girls bottoms;
likes to call his penis his 'ham howitzer'", fudged together:

Art Deco,

How amusing.

As I have mentioned earlier, I feel the need to be very cautious about
what I express concerning the Formosa issue. Now, it seems appropriate to
say a bit more.

Do you always feel the need to be very cautious about what you express
concerning the formosa issue around me?

The rammificiations of me being Formosa'd and the manner by which it was
done vigorously transcends myself; what happens here, now, in
alt.astronony and even the AUK community itself. It is not clear to me
that there are many, or even any in AUK or alt.astronony that have yet
recognized & realized, such. Some of it, some of you do know ...
In this posting, for the benefit of everyone describe a very big picture.

Everybody's taking something. Why not?

More regulation is coming to the internet in the intermediate future.
The situation speaks for itself, manifested in such events as copy
protection for mp3 files and the 'gaging' of the free expression of
bloggers. At some point in the future serious and concerted scrutiny is
going to descend upon Usenet.

What about the future?

Its a big deal. These are complex issues that will result in making
decisions which have tangible consequences.

It's unspeakable.

If I were on a comission to investigate and draft legislation so as to
better regulate the internet, I would likely cast a keen eye to places
such as AUK and the activities which have occured. In other words AUK and
its interaction with the rest of Usenet is a pretty darn good labratory
for investigating and designing regulation. For me, it is hard to imagine
how it could escape becoming a focus. I wouldn't be surprised to see this
posting dragged up 5 or 10 years hence by some very heavy weight
committee.

Snore

I do not say any of this to alarm or threaten. The Usenet of discussion
groups seems to becoming a backwater of late. The vast The last and
biggest bastion of ... The legislation and regulation will come. I
suppose that when it comes to regulating 'chat groups' it will begin with
Usenet. It is the minor yet most visible and easily documented location
for Internet discourse. Maybe I am wrong ?

Why don't you?

What has happened in AUK, what is happening now; what shall happen in
the future is likely to have an impact upon the regulations which are
eventually put in place. Strangely, the Formosa rule in combination with
your initiative, makes it all the more likely.

Nothing at the moment.

Why ? Here, I must walk very gently indeed! I wish to contribute rather
than stifle. The criticisms are easy. The solutions haven't been developed
yet. The criticism can very easily become strongly counterproductive.

You can wish all you want, I doubt you'll get it.

The Formosa Rule is like anti-smoking legislation. Once you begin, it
rolls strongly down hill, thereon. As with smoking, the default outcome
will be to legislate AUK out of existence. That would be a shame. As you
and Double-A point out; there is a genuine worth and place for doing what
AUK does. Setting up the frame work and guidlines to make it feasible
isn't easy. Very much to your credit, you are tackling the problem.

That's not a problem. Spam is a problem.

If AUK or groups like it didn't exist ? It would be an aweful mess. You
have earned my respect for what you have done. Without anything being
done, it is complete anarchy. I don't envy you. Keep at it.

I didn't suppose you did.

With certainty, the Formosa issue will come right back at you again and
again with a building and pressing need to be considered. If you achieve a
viable solution then what you will have done can serve as a basis for
dealing with the broader issue of internet legislation, and 'Freedom of
involvement, intrusion and speech' in society. There are no easy answers,
YET.

Oh no, not again?

Good luck.

Good. I'm behind you one hundred percent. Go for it.

Rising Loonie

Singing while Rome burns.

The psychiatrist said my premature ejaculation problem was from
stress!!! CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT ****!!!???

You really do have personal issues, don't you, Loonie?

P.S. Consider how many ordinary imperfect, humans committed suicide
through embarressment, fear and shame; as a result of internet child

Five, I guess.

.. to external appearances, it is plausible that some of those
'pedo's were role models for self-discipline and self-control

It's true.

Not at all like some mecurial Rising Raving Loonie who got himself
Formosa'd because he is too unstable and unpredictable.

Are you too unstable and unpredictable too?






tell me more about unpredicatable formosa

Mundane.

A person looses confidence concerning the expected outcome of their
actions.

One is working with an unknown commodity.


arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together

the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed

Fred wrote:
Rising Loonie, , whose name means "paunchy faggot;
researches symptoms of tumors and serious illnesses then gets symptoms;
skilled at riding cocks up his arse", inflected:

"Whose" COMPROMISE when there is competition is for a common resource?

Compromising is for pussies.

and monotone intransigence suits a dead head.


So you had beter attend to what you do and look out for what is done to
you.

What the hell do you think you're doing?

Why should you care what I am thinking about doing? It is for you
to decide for yourself what you are going to do.


Absolutely private.

What do you say to a sarcastic person?

That which is appropriate, expressed with the utmost sincerity.


Ignorance is bliss.

Hot enough for you?

Nawh, the lubricants haven't softened yet.



for what you know and are 'aware' He admires your style at arranging?

What possessed you to write this?

Your intrusion.


So now you know.

I don't need your help, thanks. [Sarcastically]

Absolutely, exactly, appropriatly so [ expressed sincerely ]


and if you can't remember then I have faith that you will recall it later.

Why can't I remember then you have faith that I will recall it later,
Loonie?

I have faith for myself that what I perceive at future instants
are not going to be what I am perceiving at the current instant.

I have faith that such experience is part of life's condition, in
general.


Ignorance is your perrogative.

Is your girlfriend smart?
... to that for which I am unaware and insensitive

It is not an excuse.

Excuses, excuses, excuses.

Ignorance is your perrogative.

Select what you ignore, wisely

~ O, The Lacanians
Arriviste,
Playing on the cricket green * ~

O Dog be With You ~ O, too, O

Rising Loonie, , whose name means "solid back-door
bandit; slobbers when kissing; either very nice to girls or a faggot",
tinkled:

and monotone intransigence suits a dead head.

My wife wants to be buried at sea. She knows I want to dance on her grave.

Why should you care what I am thinking about doing?

You? Thinking? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

It is for you to decide for yourself what you are going to do.

What does that mean?

That which is appropriate, expressed with the utmost sincerity.

Which is appropriate?

Nawh, the lubricants haven't softened yet.

Have a wonderful day. [This is tricky, because they're leaving to see their
son in the hospital, who's about to die of Leukaemia.]

Your intrusion.

MY GOOD MAN, I NEVER DID ANYTHING TO HARM YOU.

Absolutely, exactly, appropriatly so [ expressed sincerely ].

What do you say to a sarcastic person?

I have faith for myself that what I perceive at future instants are not
going to be what I am perceiving at the current instant.

I've outgrown that.

I have faith that such experience is part of life's condition, in general.

I've never had any.

...

I want you to know it has nothing to do with what's going on.

to that for which I am unaware and insensitive Ignorance is your
perrogative.

You are not unaware and insensitive ignorance is my perrogative. You are a
****wit.

Select what you ignore, wisely.

What does that tell you?

Fred wrote:
Rising Loonie, , whose name means "solid back-door
bandit; slobbers when kissing; either very nice to girls or a faggot",
tinkled:

and monotone intransigence suits a dead head.

My wife wants to be buried at sea. She knows I want to dance on her grave.

Encase her in concrete and bury her at a point mid-way between low and
high tide. Custom has it that her spirit will not rest easily.

Why should you care what I am thinking about doing?

You? Thinking? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Ain't it the pits.

If you are half intelligent then you have already figured it out and
there is nothing to consider.

It is for you to decide for yourself what you are going to do.

What does that mean?

This is Usenet.

You are free to express what you wish, werever you care to do so.
That such freedom of choice will be continued forward in perpituity is
unlikely.

This is Usenet. Certain other individuals are free to erase what you
express at certain locations. This freedom is likely to continue
forward into perpetuity.



That which is appropriate, expressed with the utmost sincerity.

Which is appropriate?
- the mode of expression


Nawh, the lubricants haven't softened yet.

Have a wonderful day. [This is tricky, because they're leaving to see their
son in the hospital, who's about to die of Leukaemia.]

**** happens ... except for those who are constipated or long dead.

Your intrusion.

MY GOOD MAN, I NEVER DID ANYTHING TO HARM YOU.

... My condolences as to your ineffectualness.


Absolutely, exactly, appropriatly so [ expressed sincerely ].

What do you say to a sarcastic person?

I am a bit confused. I think that you have misaligned yourself.
Could you try harder please ?


I have faith for myself that what I perceive at future instants are not
going to be what I am perceiving at the current instant.

I've outgrown that.

Retired ?


I have faith that such experience is part of life's condition, in general.

I've never had any.

A poor ability to 'Abstract' ? That's a shame.


...

I want you to know it has nothing to do with what's going on.

Doesn't that just stick in your craw ?
... Too much bloody choice in this world!


to that for which I am unaware and insensitive Ignorance is your
perrogative.

You are not unaware and insensitive ignorance is my perrogative. You are a
****wit.

It tells me that you have no qualms about asserting your own
opinions.


Select what you ignore, wisely.

What does that tell you?

If I were like most people ...

I would simply say that you are full of bull **** and cease to give
you another thought. I would write you off as being an ass hole.

.... but I am NOT like most other people.
Thus I have been Formosa'd

Good night.

Fred wrote:
Rising Loonie, , whose name means "cannot
understand why nobody else masturbates in public; pinches girls bottoms;
likes to call his penis his 'ham howitzer'", fudged together:

Art Deco,

How amusing.

As I have mentioned earlier, I feel the need to be very cautious about
what I express concerning the Formosa issue. Now, it seems appropriate to
say a bit more.

Do you always feel the need to be very cautious about what you express
concerning the formosa issue around me?

The rammificiations of me being Formosa'd and the manner by which it was
done vigorously transcends myself; what happens here, now, in
alt.astronony and even the AUK community itself. It is not clear to me
that there are many, or even any in AUK or alt.astronony that have yet
recognized & realized, such. Some of it, some of you do know ...
In this posting, for the benefit of everyone describe a very big picture.

Everybody's taking something. Why not?

More regulation is coming to the internet in the intermediate future.
The situation speaks for itself, manifested in such events as copy
protection for mp3 files and the 'gaging' of the free expression of
bloggers. At some point in the future serious and concerted scrutiny is
going to descend upon Usenet.

What about the future?

Its a big deal. These are complex issues that will result in making
decisions which have tangible consequences.

It's unspeakable.

If I were on a comission to investigate and draft legislation so as to
better regulate the internet, I would likely cast a keen eye to places
such as AUK and the activities which have occured. In other words AUK and
its interaction with the rest of Usenet is a pretty darn good labratory
for investigating and designing regulation. For me, it is hard to imagine
how it could escape becoming a focus. I wouldn't be surprised to see this
posting dragged up 5 or 10 years hence by some very heavy weight
committee.

Snore

I do not say any of this to alarm or threaten. The Usenet of discussion
groups seems to becoming a backwater of late. The vast The last and
biggest bastion of ... The legislation and regulation will come. I
suppose that when it comes to regulating 'chat groups' it will begin with
Usenet. It is the minor yet most visible and easily documented location
for Internet discourse. Maybe I am wrong ?

Why don't you?

What has happened in AUK, what is happening now; what shall happen in
the future is likely to have an impact upon the regulations which are
eventually put in place. Strangely, the Formosa rule in combination with
your initiative, makes it all the more likely.

Nothing at the moment.

Why ? Here, I must walk very gently indeed! I wish to contribute rather
than stifle. The criticisms are easy. The solutions haven't been developed
yet. The criticism can very easily become strongly counterproductive.

You can wish all you want, I doubt you'll get it.

The Formosa Rule is like anti-smoking legislation. Once you begin, it
rolls strongly down hill, thereon. As with smoking, the default outcome
will be to legislate AUK out of existence. That would be a shame. As you
and Double-A point out; there is a genuine worth and place for doing what
AUK does. Setting up the frame work and guidlines to make it feasible
isn't easy. Very much to your credit, you are tackling the problem.

That's not a problem. Spam is a problem.

If AUK or groups like it didn't exist ? It would be an aweful mess. You
have earned my respect for what you have done. Without anything being
done, it is complete anarchy. I don't envy you. Keep at it.

I didn't suppose you did.

With certainty, the Formosa issue will come right back at you again and
again with a building and pressing need to be considered. If you achieve a
viable solution then what you will have done can serve as a basis for
dealing with the broader issue of internet legislation, and 'Freedom of
involvement, intrusion and speech' in society. There are no easy answers,
YET.

Oh no, not again?

Good luck.

Good. I'm behind you one hundred percent. Go for it.

Rising Loonie

Singing while Rome burns.

The psychiatrist said my premature ejaculation problem was from
stress!!! CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT ****!!!???

You really do have personal issues, don't you, Loonie?

P.S. Consider how many ordinary imperfect, humans committed suicide
through embarressment, fear and shame; as a result of internet child

Five, I guess.

.. to external appearances, it is plausible that some of those
'pedo's were role models for self-discipline and self-control

It's true.

Not at all like some mecurial Rising Raving Loonie who got himself
Formosa'd because he is too unstable and unpredictable.

Are you too unstable and unpredictable too?


Hi bot!

Double-A