![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't suppose some kind soul on here knows what the well depths of
the chips used in these two cameras is? The chips are both Sony: ICX404AK and ICX424AQ. -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Pete,
According to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/868 the well depth of an ICX454AL as used in the DSI Pro is 60k electrons and a similar figure is given there for the ICX405AK which is claimed to be similar to the ICX404AK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/427 Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments Robin "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... I don't suppose some kind soul on here knows what the well depths of the chips used in these two cameras is? The chips are both Sony: ICX404AK and ICX424AQ. -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:53:09 +0100, "Robin Leadbeater"
wrote: Hi Pete, According to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/868 the well depth of an ICX454AL as used in the DSI Pro is 60k electrons and a similar figure is given there for the ICX405AK which is claimed to be similar to the ICX404AK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/427 Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments Thanks Robin. Unfortunately, I need an official source for this information. Sony publish the technical specs of their CCDs e.g. http://products.sel.sony.com/semi/PDF/ICX404AK.pdf but I'm probably too stupid to be able to determine the value from the data presented. Either that or it's not shown ;-) -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robin Leadbeater" wrote in message ... Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments BTW , given its 8 bit webcam heritage, I would guess that the ATIK would saturate the A/D converter long before full well depth is reached. (Apologies for the top posting in my prevous post - I was still in "Yahoo Groups" mode) Robin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:31:15 +0100, "Robin Leadbeater"
wrote: "Robin Leadbeater" wrote in message ... Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments BTW , given its 8 bit webcam heritage, I would guess that the ATIK would saturate the A/D converter long before full well depth is reached. (Apologies for the top posting in my prevous post - I was still in "Yahoo Groups" mode) They're an uncivilised lot ;-) -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... Thanks Robin. Unfortunately, I need an official source for this information. Sony publish the technical specs of their CCDs e.g. http://products.sel.sony.com/semi/PDF/ICX404AK.pdf but I'm probably too stupid to be able to determine the value from the data presented. Either that or it's not shown ;-) AFAIK Sony don't publish well depths - hence the various unofficial figures Robin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:53:09 +0100, "Robin Leadbeater" wrote: Hi Pete, According to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/868 the well depth of an ICX454AL as used in the DSI Pro is 60k electrons and a similar figure is given there for the ICX405AK which is claimed to be similar to the ICX404AK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/427 Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments Thanks Robin. Unfortunately, I need an official source for this information. Sony publish the technical specs of their CCDs e.g. http://products.sel.sony.com/semi/PDF/ICX404AK.pdf but I'm probably too stupid to be able to determine the value from the data presented. Either that or it's not shown ;-) It's not shown. Remember these are all ABG cameras, so the well capacity should never normally be reached. Also that 'well depth' figures published for cameras, are very innacurate. Generally they are 'minima', and for example, it is common on the some Kodak CCDs, to have the well capacity over 25% higher than the quoted figure. You can calculate the gain of the system fairly easily from a group of different exposure length flat field images, and given this, you can find either the point where the ABG limits further gain, or if you disable the ABG, the well depth of the camera. This is what the people who have posted figures have done, and these are usually nearly as accurate as published figures, (but reflect the particular example used, rather than the 'worst case', normally used by manufacturers figures). Best Wishes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:12:33 GMT, "Roger Hamlett"
wrote: "Pete Lawrence" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:53:09 +0100, "Robin Leadbeater" wrote: Hi Pete, According to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/868 the well depth of an ICX454AL as used in the DSI Pro is 60k electrons and a similar figure is given there for the ICX405AK which is claimed to be similar to the ICX404AK http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeepSp...ed/message/427 Don't know about the ATIK2C, but for a given chip design, well depth tends to scale with pixel area which would make it about 45k electrons? but you could try asking on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/atik_instruments Thanks Robin. Unfortunately, I need an official source for this information. Sony publish the technical specs of their CCDs e.g. http://products.sel.sony.com/semi/PDF/ICX404AK.pdf but I'm probably too stupid to be able to determine the value from the data presented. Either that or it's not shown ;-) It's not shown. Remember these are all ABG cameras, so the well capacity should never normally be reached. Also that 'well depth' figures published for cameras, are very innacurate. Generally they are 'minima', and for example, it is common on the some Kodak CCDs, to have the well capacity over 25% higher than the quoted figure. You can calculate the gain of the system fairly easily from a group of different exposure length flat field images, and given this, you can find either the point where the ABG limits further gain, or if you disable the ABG, the well depth of the camera. This is what the people who have posted figures have done, and these are usually nearly as accurate as published figures, (but reflect the particular example used, rather than the 'worst case', normally used by manufacturers figures). Thanks Roger, that makes sense. -- Pete http://www.digitalsky.org.uk Recent images http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/recent/recent_images.html ** Last update June 24 2005 ** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|