![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers,
or Shuttle Zs? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TKalbfus wrote:
So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers, or Shuttle Zs? None of the above. A launcher in the 25,000kg payload to LEO and then design around Earth Orbit Rendevous. Build in volume purchasing with something that has multiple applications besides the single mission. The key here is leveragable infrastucture. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2003-12-06, TKalbfus wrote:
So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers, or Shuttle Zs? Assuming we go, I think its likely to be a variant of the Delta-IV Heavy. Saturn V has the problem of reopening the assembly lines, not to mention the expertise and experience that has been lost along the way. It would be like starting again from scratch. Magnum, and Ares are little more than paper rockets (OK, they are a little more, but not much imho) By the time Lunar missions happen (again assuming they do), there is a strong possibility Shuttle Hardware won't be with us. OSP will launch on the EELV platform, and its _possible_ that EELV (or variant) may get used for Assured (Or is it Alternative now?) Access to Space. [Agreed, its also possible that Shuttle will be used for AAS, unmanned, thus negating my argument about Shuttle Hardware... ![]() The Delta IV design concept, on the other hand, seems to have at least some scope for larger variants. Heavy is scheduled to fly May next year, and there have been many discussions of potential "Super|Mega" Heavy variants in here... All the Best Iain |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06 Dec 2003 20:51:51 GMT, in a place far, far away,
(TKalbfus) made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers, or Shuttle Zs? None of the above would be fine with me. -- simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole) interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..." Swap the first . and @ and throw out the ".trash" to email me. Here's my email address for autospammers: |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iain Young" wrote in message ... On 2003-12-06, TKalbfus wrote: So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers, or Shuttle Zs? Assuming we go, I think its likely to be a variant of the Delta-IV Heavy. Saturn V has the problem of reopening the assembly lines, not to mention the expertise and experience that has been lost along the way. It would be like starting again from scratch. Not to mention the first stage was built where the ETs are currently built. Magnum, and Ares are little more than paper rockets (OK, they are a little more, but not much imho) By the time Lunar missions happen (again assuming they do), there is a strong possibility Shuttle Hardware won't be with us. OSP will launch on the EELV platform, and its _possible_ that EELV (or variant) may get used for Assured (Or is it Alternative now?) Access to Space. [Agreed, its also possible that Shuttle will be used for AAS, unmanned, thus negating my argument about Shuttle Hardware... ![]() The Delta IV design concept, on the other hand, seems to have at least some scope for larger variants. Heavy is scheduled to fly May next year, and there have been many discussions of potential "Super|Mega" Heavy variants in here... All the Best Iain |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
None of the above.
A launcher in the 25,000kg payload to LEO and then design around Earth Orbit Rendevous. Or how about standing up 4 of these launchers side by side on the launch pad and lash them together so they can lift a 100 tone payload to orbit? Earth orbit rendevous means lingering in orbit for a while exposed to space junk while your waiting to get the other pieces up. You have to put pieces A, B, C, and D together. What if there is something wrong with piece B, that only becomes apparent once it reaches orbit? A, C, and D are just fine, so they wait in orbit, getting exposed to more space junk while a replacement for be is assembled and another launcher is built to launch it. The comes the process of assembly. Send the astroworkers into orbit, these people aren't going to the moon, their task is to assemble the moonship. They better have brought all the tools their going to need. The process needs to be carefully choriographed in swimming pools with mockups. The Lunar geologists await on Earth while the mission of assemble goes on. The mission in this case begins with assembly rather than a launch. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about a nuclear upper stage?, this would reduce the propellant requirement.
More mass can then be devoted to the lander. Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TKalbfus wrote: So what will it be. Do we build new Saturn Vs, Magnum rockets, Ares launchers, or Shuttle Zs? What we have available today or the near term. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TKalbfus wrote: None of the above. A launcher in the 25,000kg payload to LEO and then design around Earth Orbit Rendevous. Or how about standing up 4 of these launchers side by side on the launch pad and lash them together so they can lift a 100 tone payload to orbit? All this is not going to happen. What is needed is a completely new concept to get to the Moon. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |