![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sometime in the late 1970's John Dobson invented a type of telescope. This
was driven by necessity, in that cheap materials were relied on the build a telescope that resembled a cannon and used large bearings of Teflon and Formica. I owned such a telescope, a 13.1 inch dobsonian sold by Coulter Optical back in the 1980's. It was a beast, and was almost impossible to move. Coulter also sold 17.5 inch and 29 inch Dobsonian models in blue livery. Their bulk is the reason that I don't see any Dobsonian telescopes around today. There was a brief period when there were many such telescopes being made, as recorded in the pages of the now defunct TM magazine. They were made of plywood or chipboard, with a tube of cardboard. This design allowed a considerable number of amateurs to afford a larger aperture telescope. What changed this was the publication in TM issue 17 in 1981 of Ivar Hamberg 's truss tube alt-az telescope. Despite them being called Dobsonians, they bear as much relationship to Dobson's design as the VCR does to DVD. Almost all modern alt-az mounted telescopes these days copy this design, which has been considerably refined by David Kreige. These Kreigescopes are called "Obsessions". Ivar's article in TM#17 introduced the collapsible truss tube, allowing disassembly and transport to dark skied from urban areas. This opened up a whole new field of large aperture deep sky observers, a whole new trend. Ivar's design has been further evolved to some ultra light designs to reinforce this trend. Yet Ivar is almost forgotten. They are not called "Hambergians". His contribution is almost forgotten. Why? Is it that Dobson is a citizen of the USA whilst Ivar is from Stockholm, Sweden? Is there a jingoistic bias here? Does everyone really think that Ivar's design is really just another Dobsonian, just because it uses an Alt-Az mounting, just like Herschel used? I don't think so. I think Ivar needs a bit more recognition than what he is currently given. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
StarDust wrote:
Sometime in the late 1970's John Dobson invented a type of telescope. This was driven by necessity, in that cheap materials were relied on the build a telescope that resembled a cannon and used large bearings of Teflon and Formica. That seems a bit simplified. Try http://www.johndobson.org/ More to it than just inventing or developing a telescope mount, it seems. Much more. -- Anders Thulin ath*algonet.se http://www.algonet.se/~ath |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() StarDust wrote: Yet Ivar is almost forgotten. They are not called "Hambergians". His contribution is almost forgotten. Why? Is it that Dobson is a citizen of the USA whilst Ivar is from Stockholm, Sweden? Is there a jingoistic bias here? Hi: What's your evidence for that? It ain't "jingoism," it's _ignorance_. I have never heard of him--and I suspect the same goes for most other American amateurs. The reasons Mssr Hambergian is not "remembered"? --Though the truss tube idea is incredibly poplular and important for larger scopes, the basic _and MOST important_ idea, which this design still uses, an alt-az mount using large formica-teflon bearings, had become identified with John Dobson for some time before the truss tube idea came to the fore. Yes, these modifications were important, but most people look upon them as "just" mods of the basic idea J.D. popularized. --Again, most people have never heard of this person. --It is my impression that the truss tube idea was something being worked on by several people more-or-less simultaneously, and that giving one person credit for the design would be a little erroneous. The truss tube scope amateurs use today is a mixture of innovations devloped by people like Dave Kriege, Tom Clark, Randy Cunningham, and many more that I, not being a Dobber, have probably forgotten. ;-) I believe in credit where credit is due. If you think this person deserves recognition as the "inventor" of truss tube scopes, spread the word. Give presentations on him at star parties and clubs. Write articles for astronomy mags, etc. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of:_Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stardust - I'd have to say the accuracy of most of your post is largely
in question. First off, John Dobson (perhaps to the surprise of many) was hardly the inventor of a new or revolutionary telescope design. He simply re-popularized a telescope design that (save for the thin primary mirror) had been in use for more than 150 years previously but employed less expensive materials. Commercial telescope makers in England and on the continent were using the design widely well before the turn of the 20th century, as a check of early advertisements will indicate. Indeed, fixed military shore batteries were mounted in essentially this same manner for centuries. Solid-tube Dobsonsian telescopes, faithful to the original 1970's Dobson scopes, continue to be by far the most popular of all medium to relatively large (8" - 16") Newtonian telescope types - not truss tube designs, which are much more typical of high-priced commercial units than of lower-priced or homebuilt scopes. And at least in the United States, collapsible truss-tube scopes are down right rare. So is it really surprising that Ivar Hamberg's name is not linked to any particular scope design and has gained little recognition? Probably not. CNJ999 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod brings up excellent points. (His use of the word "popularize" is key.) I
think the reason John is a household name is that he goes everywhere and talks to anyone and everyone. The man is a tireless speaker, traveling the world. (Just NEVER ask him about his train trip across Russia and his experience with cabbage, you have been warned!) He is incredibly charismatic and enigmatic. John stirs up excitement (and a bit of controversy) where-ever he goes. John is almost as good at marketing himself as Madonna. I may not agree with his cosmological views but he is darned fun to be around. Like others, I have never heard of Ivan but you have sparked my interest and I will look him up and see what I can find. (Maybe Ivan is another Nicola Tesla of history?) Dawn Baird-Chleborad www.wodenoptics.com www.astronerds.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:11:01 +1100, "StarDust"
wrote: Sometime in the late 1970's John Dobson invented a type of telescope. This was driven by necessity, in that cheap materials were relied on the build a telescope that resembled a cannon and used large bearings of Teflon and Formica. Dobson didn't invent a type of telescope. He really didn't invent anything. On the technical front, what he did was take advantage of some new materials to modify a type of mount that had been around already a long time. But what he really did was to become a spokesman for budget astronomy. He popularized inexpensive, large aperture telescopes. He still does. It is his strong public presence that is responsible for his fame. Ivar's article in TM#17 introduced the collapsible truss tube, allowing disassembly and transport to dark skied from urban areas. This opened up a whole new field of large aperture deep sky observers, a whole new trend. Maybe, but it was just another technical adjustment. We remember Serrurier for the truss design itself- making it collapsible is interesting, but no more exciting technically than using formica and teflon instead of more expensive bearings. I guess that if Hamberg had spent a generation pounding the streets of Stockholm like Dobson has done in San Francisco, his name would be more widely known. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One thing, the home telescope builder still, for the most part, follows the
Dobsonian way, my Babylon 8 which came to be with the help of many others is a soild tube Dobsonian that has a bit of a mod so it's eayer to use for Sidewalk Astronomy. I know I've read of and seen home made truss scopes too, and as others have said, I've never heard of the one you posted about. There's one small company right here in Calif. I wish I could win the Lotto, as then I could afford to have them make me a verson of their design to fit my B8's mirror, it's a cross between closed tubes and truss, as it's a framework that has two sections, one that slides into the other for transportaion. Hay they are in the FAQ too. But until that day comes, I use my B8, it might not be as good as it could be, but I was the only one to do the hands on work of building it and it's the best I could do. As far as the store bought scopes go, the soild tube Dobsonian still in the number one type of scopes sold and can be found very easy. -- SIAR www.starlords.org Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord "StarDust" wrote in message ... Sometime in the late 1970's John Dobson invented a type of telescope. This was driven by necessity, in that cheap materials were relied on the build a telescope that resembled a cannon and used large bearings of Teflon and Formica. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris L Peterson wrote:
Maybe, but it was just another technical adjustment. We remember Serrurier for the truss design itself A funny thing, but 90% "remember" Serrurier trusses wrongly. The Serrurier truss extends from the pivot to the secondary, and another truss extends from the pivot to the primary, balancing deflections and keeping the planes of the primary and secondary aligned. Just sticking poles on the primary box, doesn't make it Serrurier trussed Steve |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:37:45 +0000, Steve Taylor
wrote: A funny thing, but 90% "remember" Serrurier trusses wrongly. The Serrurier truss extends from the pivot to the secondary, and another truss extends from the pivot to the primary, balancing deflections and keeping the planes of the primary and secondary aligned. Just sticking poles on the primary box, doesn't make it Serrurier trussed No, it doesn't, and I didn't mean to suggest that all such designs utilize Serrurier trusses. But Serrurier really developed the concept of using a truss to support the secondary, and is rightfully remembered for this- not unlike we call a certain class of mount Dobsonian even if it doesn't utilize any of the materials popularized by John Dobson. Serrurier developed his system for equatorial telescopes, which are much more difficult to design than altaz telescopes. Simpler truss systems are possible if gravity is only operating on one axis of the scope. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RMOLLISE wrote:
I believe in credit where credit is due. If you think this person deserves recognition as the "inventor" of truss tube scopes, spread the word. Give presentations on him at star parties and clubs. Write articles for astronomy mags, etc. And make it about him rather than about tearing others like Dobson down in the process. Clear skies, Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Observing: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html Comets: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/comets.html To reply have a physician remove your spleen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Large Binocular Telescope to be Dedicated in October 2004 | Ron | Misc | 3 | September 25th 04 06:15 PM |
Websites with plans for telescope making? | Jcschmid2 | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | February 18th 04 11:00 PM |
Making a 5" Reflector Telescope | Scott Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | February 16th 04 02:34 AM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |