![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't been able to get ANY of my comments posted in ANY moderated
sci.space.* group since September 3, 2004. Why? When I mentioned this outrage publicly I did get a response to my last posting. Here it is. What a crock of sh*t Your message has been rejected by the moderators. Their individual rejection messages we Moderator Graham said: Please do not send replies that do not contain any of the message that you are replying to. Leaving relevant parts of the message helps people to read your post in context. The posting guidelines for the sci.space.moderated newsgroup and gated mailing list can be found at http://www.robomod.net/sci.space.moderated/ A copy of your message is attached below. ----- snip ----- Return-Path: X-Original-To: Received: from sol01.isp.gweep.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sol01.isp.gweep.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 91F43AD4A for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:52:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from trinity.supernews.net (trinity.ranger.supernews.net [216.168.1.22]) by sol01.isp.gweep.ca (SMTP proxy) with SMTP id 35544 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:52:23 -0600 Received: from proxy.google.com ([216.239.37.5]:15861) by trinity.supernews.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CPqSj-000DmT-E0 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 22:52:13 +0000 Received: from G000080 by proxy.google.com with ESMTP id iA4Mpehh007408 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:51:40 -0800 Received: (from news@localhost) by Google Production with id iA4MpeeG009384 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:51:40 -0800 From: (william mook) Newsgroups: sci.space.moderated,sci.space.policy Subject: Moral Equivalent Of A Space Program X-Original-Date: 4 Nov 2004 14:51:40 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gweep-Robomod-Bayes-Sco 0.0001 If the US is in the business of liberating the world, then we must first liberate the minds of those teenage boys and girls growing up under the thumb of muslim clerics. We can best do this by doing anything we can do to inspire the imagination of those boys and girls. This is achieved by space travel development and commercial space development. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() (crickets chirping--or is that snickering?) --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
November 5, 2004
william mook wrote: I haven't been able to get ANY of my comments posted in ANY moderated sci.space.* group since September 3, 2004. Why? When I mentioned this outrage publicly I did get a response to my last posting. Here it is. What a crock of sh*t Isn't it? sci.space.tech is nearly dead, almost as bad as sci.space.moderated. Take every thread and every post you are interested in, trim out all the headers, add sci.space.policy to the header, and repost it in sci.space.policy with your reply. It will drive George nuts. Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() william mook wrote: I haven't been able to get ANY of my comments posted in ANY moderated sci.space.* group since September 3, 2004. Why? Maybe you should try posting something both on-topic AND not stark raving looney. Just a suggestion. When I mentioned this outrage Outrage? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"william mook" wrote in message
om... I haven't been able to get ANY of my comments posted in ANY moderated sci.space.* group since September 3, 2004. Why? BTW Bill, what *is* your DUNS number? -- Terrell Miller "But. this scam fooled so many white liberals because white liberals don't really think much about nonwhites. They just think about all the ways they are superior to conservative whites!" -- Steve Sailer on the election IQ scam |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
william mook wrote:
I haven't been able to get ANY of my comments posted in ANY moderated sci.space.* group since September 3, 2004. William, please calm down. You should be more specific than this. Whatever is going on here is not involving the groups other than sci.space.moderated. As far as I can tell you've been posting your usual rate to .tech and .science and I've been approving it. I have six articles of yours in the approved and posted out to the internet folder for .tech/.science which were posted since 9/2/04: 335 09/20 william mook A first blueprint for interstellar travelS 336 09/20 william mook A first blueprint for interstellar travelS 339 09/20 william mook Reasonable Space Vehiclenavigaiter2002@aol 382 09/25 william mook Question about using balloons to get into sp 412 10/10*william mook Pocket Rockethttp://www.technologyreview.com/a 429 10/14 william mook Hybrid Motor Performancehttp://members.aol.com -george william herbert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: [...] sci.space.tech is nearly dead, almost as bad as sci.space.moderated. Which is more nearly dead? A newsgroup with lots of traffic but signal/noise = nearly zero. A newsgroup with a little traffic but signal/noise = 1000. People like yourself damage the health of the former. People like George improve the health of the latter. -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earl Colby Pottinger :
(william mook) : [Snip] William, I like you, some of the stuff you write is even interesting. But until you can learn to express an idea in less that fifty a point I can understand why someone may think you are jumping all over the place and going off topic. You really need to write less in your introductions to an idea. You usually have so many assumations people who don't know will think you are a just troll. Above should read "until you can learn to express an idea in less that fifty *lines* a point I can understand why someone may think you are jumping all over the place". Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Earl Colby Pottinger wrote: [...] people who don't know will think you are a just troll. As opposed to an unjust troll? -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|