A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

oops, it crashed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 14th 04, 05:45 PM
RSKT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

process of elimination?
they know the EXACT composition of desert sand, so just subtract whatever
they have with this component and walla, they have the composition of sun
poo !

:-)


"Lloyd Jones" wrote in message
...
Is it possible that they can still analyse any of the particles they

brought
back?

LJ




  #22  
Old September 15th 04, 03:03 AM
Odysseus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Odysseus Landings are NASA biggest problems. Pilots know that.
Besides parachutes there are many ways to take away the force of a fast
landing.(stop) NASA should practice dropping eggs off the Sears Tower.
On TV I saw a contest how eggs were made to land from great heights,and
did not splat. Bert


What were some of the techniques used? The model-rocketry club I was
in for a while -- I must have been about twelve -- had "egg-lofting"
contests, but I don't recall anything more innovative than parachutes
or, on some of the smaller models, streamers being used to soften the
landings. The ejection charges in the engines (or sometimes the
nose-cone fittings) had a fairly high failure rate, but I remember at
least one brave soul actually managing to run out and safely catch
his falling payload.

--
Odysseus
  #23  
Old September 15th 04, 12:54 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Odysseus Parachutes #1 but with all that time and money NASA
should not have its eggs in one basket(so to speak) The capsule needed
back up systems in case parachutes don't open. It could have a
inflating balloon to add buoyant to slow it down etc Might be
interesting to have others in this group add their ideas as how to
create a softer impact. Bert.

  #24  
Old September 15th 04, 08:38 PM
Saul Levy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've seen drop contests on TV. They use protective packaging. The
better designs actually keep the egg whole in a 30-foot or so drop.
Amazing! Wish the Post Office knew about this...

Saul Levy


On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 02:03:47 GMT, Odysseus
wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Odysseus Landings are NASA biggest problems. Pilots know that.
Besides parachutes there are many ways to take away the force of a fast
landing.(stop) NASA should practice dropping eggs off the Sears Tower.
On TV I saw a contest how eggs were made to land from great heights,and
did not splat. Bert


What were some of the techniques used? The model-rocketry club I was
in for a while -- I must have been about twelve -- had "egg-lofting"
contests, but I don't recall anything more innovative than parachutes
or, on some of the smaller models, streamers being used to soften the
landings. The ejection charges in the engines (or sometimes the
nose-cone fittings) had a fairly high failure rate, but I remember at
least one brave soul actually managing to run out and safely catch
his falling payload.

  #25  
Old September 17th 04, 03:53 AM
BP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was amazed at the velocity before impact, was it only 190mph? The
profile kind of looks close to a flat plate that aerodynamicists talk about.
Maybe if we put a cat on board...

BP

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
I've seen drop contests on TV. They use protective packaging. The
better designs actually keep the egg whole in a 30-foot or so drop.
Amazing! Wish the Post Office knew about this...

Saul Levy


On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 02:03:47 GMT, Odysseus
wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi Odysseus Landings are NASA biggest problems. Pilots know that.
Besides parachutes there are many ways to take away the force of a fast
landing.(stop) NASA should practice dropping eggs off the Sears Tower.
On TV I saw a contest how eggs were made to land from great heights,and
did not splat. Bert


What were some of the techniques used? The model-rocketry club I was
in for a while -- I must have been about twelve -- had "egg-lofting"
contests, but I don't recall anything more innovative than parachutes
or, on some of the smaller models, streamers being used to soften the
landings. The ejection charges in the engines (or sometimes the
nose-cone fittings) had a fairly high failure rate, but I remember at
least one brave soul actually managing to run out and safely catch
his falling payload.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SETI Pro just crashed on every PC David Farrier SETI 0 June 8th 04 08:54 PM
Oops! Even Shawn's Windbox Choices are Shrinking! Davoud Amateur Astronomy 15 January 9th 04 12:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.