![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative?
How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative? How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread for the topic. Thank you. BV. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi BV You are welcome Had this thought for a few weeks. Little afraid of
posting it. Still God hates a coward Don't really know the answers,but seems to me it is worth some good thinking. Bert. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Benign Vanilla" wrote in message ... "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative? How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread for the topic. Thank you. BV. thank you bert, an excellent post indeed, please continue, in another group.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll bite:
q. 1 yes q. 2 depends q. 3 Is this a woodchuck question? :-) Actually, I just came to answer your post to tell you something: Thank you. I've been crunching an ancient Egyptian math formula for 3 years, trying to crack it. I saw your nickname and BAM! Yep. The answer is 256. -- From the Desk of Lise Eleanor http://www3.sympatico.ca/l_e/ "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative? How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote
Benign Vanilla wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative? How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert Bert, I have no idea how to answer your question, but I love the new thread for the topic. Thank you. BV. nightbat Yes Bert, per energy. Group organized potential flow or static electricity is a basic component of energy intrinsic disturbed or organized unit and always is in perpetual motion. Only relative from composite mutual nature, energy, and whose varied multi motion is permitted in a disturbed field state. They are all relative from an energy base frame. And yes, may be very tricky to the uninitiated questioning observer. the nightbat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nightbat wrote
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hi BV You are welcome Had this thought for a few weeks. Little afraid of posting it. Still God hates a coward Don't really know the answers,but seems to me it is worth some good thinking. Bert. nightbat It was a very good thought Bert, you should be glad you had the guts to post it. Never be afraid to post your imaginative science thoughts. Try however, to keep your sexual thoughts or inclinations about potential space beauties more directed internally and or most importantly towards your wife. Cuts down on any possible needless stress levels and makes those interesting what if thoughts apparently flow better. Don't get me wrong, most of us would love a nice pic of cosmic enchanting mysterious Darla in reported bisexual birthday suit, just for science sake of course. (:~) the nightbat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get out the old Griffiths book "Intro to Electrodynamics." That will help
you in relativistic questions. BP "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Let me start with magnetisim,and static electricity. Are they relative? How about electricity being created by motion. Is its motion relative to our motion,and is our motion relative to its motion? With all the motions going in different speeds and directions how relative can they get? Tricky stuff Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi nightbat You just did what you told me not to do.Ha Ha ha bisexual
Darla in a birthday suit(oh ya) Bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well QM and GR are not relative. Einstein figured that out right away.
How about Max Born's "probability waves" in QM. Do we have probability ocean waves?(I think not),and yet. Max told us that an electron wave must be interpreted by viewing it from a standpoint of "probability" It might be here there,but don'"t try to pin point it. Here in our GR world we don't have anything relative to that. We can pin point stuff easily. How can we predict experimental outcomes in QM if there is a probability that "any" given outcome may occur? I wonder if Einstein and Max stayed friends after Max came up with probability. I can't see Heisenberg,and Einstein being very close. Their thinking was not relative. Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Relative Distance & Mass of the Sun and Earth | JeffP | Solar | 2 | January 11th 04 02:15 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
Relative Motion | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | July 19th 03 02:40 PM |
Sun's position relative to the planets? | Matthew F Funke | Science | 5 | July 15th 03 02:34 PM |