A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hubble: RIP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 17th 04, 02:28 AM
JXStern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:59:29 GMT, "Chuck"
wrote:
"A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talkin' real money ..."
Everett Dirksen


And back then, it was. With inflation over the years, a billion then
(circa 1960) is like maybe eight billion today.

Still a classic quote!

J.


  #12  
Old January 17th 04, 02:28 AM
JXStern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:59:29 GMT, "Chuck"
wrote:
"A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talkin' real money ..."
Everett Dirksen


And back then, it was. With inflation over the years, a billion then
(circa 1960) is like maybe eight billion today.

Still a classic quote!

J.


  #13  
Old January 17th 04, 02:28 AM
JXStern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:59:29 GMT, "Chuck"
wrote:
"A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talkin' real money ..."
Everett Dirksen


And back then, it was. With inflation over the years, a billion then
(circa 1960) is like maybe eight billion today.

Still a classic quote!

J.


  #14  
Old January 17th 04, 01:44 PM
Hilton Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

"Joe S." wrote in message ...

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html


QUOTE

Hubble casualty of Bush space plan
Friday, January 16, 2004 Posted: 7:54 PM EST (0054 GMT)
John Grunsfeld, NASA's chief scientist, said NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe
made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the
Hubble when it became clear there was not enough time to conduct it before
the shuttle is retired. The servicing mission was considered essential to
enable the orbiting telescope to continue to operate.

"This is a sad day," said Grunsfeld, but he said the decision "is the best
thing for the space community."


Gives new meaning to the phrase "on message." :-(


--
Hilton Evans
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lon -71° 04' 35.3"
Lat +42° 11' 06.7"
---------------------------------------------------------------
CCD Astroimaging
http://home.earthlink.net/~hiltoneva...troimaging.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
ChemPen Chemical Structure Software
http://www.chempensoftware.com




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04

  #15  
Old January 17th 04, 01:44 PM
Hilton Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

"Joe S." wrote in message ...

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html


QUOTE

Hubble casualty of Bush space plan
Friday, January 16, 2004 Posted: 7:54 PM EST (0054 GMT)
John Grunsfeld, NASA's chief scientist, said NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe
made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the
Hubble when it became clear there was not enough time to conduct it before
the shuttle is retired. The servicing mission was considered essential to
enable the orbiting telescope to continue to operate.

"This is a sad day," said Grunsfeld, but he said the decision "is the best
thing for the space community."


Gives new meaning to the phrase "on message." :-(


--
Hilton Evans
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lon -71° 04' 35.3"
Lat +42° 11' 06.7"
---------------------------------------------------------------
CCD Astroimaging
http://home.earthlink.net/~hiltoneva...troimaging.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
ChemPen Chemical Structure Software
http://www.chempensoftware.com




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04

  #16  
Old January 17th 04, 01:44 PM
Hilton Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

"Joe S." wrote in message ...

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html


QUOTE

Hubble casualty of Bush space plan
Friday, January 16, 2004 Posted: 7:54 PM EST (0054 GMT)
John Grunsfeld, NASA's chief scientist, said NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe
made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the
Hubble when it became clear there was not enough time to conduct it before
the shuttle is retired. The servicing mission was considered essential to
enable the orbiting telescope to continue to operate.

"This is a sad day," said Grunsfeld, but he said the decision "is the best
thing for the space community."


Gives new meaning to the phrase "on message." :-(


--
Hilton Evans
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lon -71° 04' 35.3"
Lat +42° 11' 06.7"
---------------------------------------------------------------
CCD Astroimaging
http://home.earthlink.net/~hiltoneva...troimaging.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
ChemPen Chemical Structure Software
http://www.chempensoftware.com




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04

  #17  
Old January 17th 04, 01:44 PM
Hilton Evans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

"Joe S." wrote in message ...

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/0....ap/index.html


QUOTE

Hubble casualty of Bush space plan
Friday, January 16, 2004 Posted: 7:54 PM EST (0054 GMT)
John Grunsfeld, NASA's chief scientist, said NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe
made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the
Hubble when it became clear there was not enough time to conduct it before
the shuttle is retired. The servicing mission was considered essential to
enable the orbiting telescope to continue to operate.

"This is a sad day," said Grunsfeld, but he said the decision "is the best
thing for the space community."


Gives new meaning to the phrase "on message." :-(


--
Hilton Evans
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lon -71° 04' 35.3"
Lat +42° 11' 06.7"
---------------------------------------------------------------
CCD Astroimaging
http://home.earthlink.net/~hiltoneva...troimaging.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
ChemPen Chemical Structure Software
http://www.chempensoftware.com




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.561 / Virus Database: 353 - Release Date: 1/13/04

  #18  
Old January 18th 04, 02:21 AM
Engineer Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:53:50 -0500, "Dennis Woos"
wrote:

And to top it off, to allocate only $1bn in new money! I read that John
Glenn has commented that a genuine effort to achieve the manned missions
that Bush has layed out would require $1trillion. What a sad story.


And that billion is to be spread out over 5 years. That's only 200
million a year!

scotty
  #19  
Old January 18th 04, 02:21 AM
Engineer Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:53:50 -0500, "Dennis Woos"
wrote:

And to top it off, to allocate only $1bn in new money! I read that John
Glenn has commented that a genuine effort to achieve the manned missions
that Bush has layed out would require $1trillion. What a sad story.


And that billion is to be spread out over 5 years. That's only 200
million a year!

scotty
  #20  
Old January 18th 04, 02:21 AM
Engineer Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hubble: RIP

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:53:50 -0500, "Dennis Woos"
wrote:

And to top it off, to allocate only $1bn in new money! I read that John
Glenn has commented that a genuine effort to achieve the manned missions
that Bush has layed out would require $1trillion. What a sad story.


And that billion is to be spread out over 5 years. That's only 200
million a year!

scotty
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Is Not Giving Up On Hubble! (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 2 May 2nd 04 01:46 PM
Don't Desert Hubble Scott M. Kozel Space Shuttle 54 March 5th 04 04:38 PM
Don't Desert Hubble Scott M. Kozel Policy 46 February 17th 04 05:33 PM
Hubble images being colorized to enhance their appeal for public - LA Times Rusty B Policy 4 September 15th 03 10:38 AM
News: Hubble plans and policy Kent Betts History 101 August 18th 03 09:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.