10 grams of push of PNN SUB321N !

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sarÃ* rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non volerÃ* mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! 😊

E sballo

On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sarÃ* rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non volerÃ* mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! 😊

E sballo



https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

On 24-Apr-21 3:34 pm, pnn calmagorod wrote:

Dal nostro agente americano sperimentatore Michael:
“Congrats on being invited to APEC! I heard from Gabriel. I'll be around to help explain the concept. I've made some improvements (F432 ndr) which I will be testing in the fall. “

-Da Gabriel Socio Asps
“Aspetto che mi contatti lui come gli hai scritto tu di fare; se ritarda mi faccio vivo io.
Quando gli hai scritto dei 10 gr (di spinta di SUB321N ndr) ci sarà rimasto male Precedente mi ha scritto che era riuscito a potenziare F432 ma non so di quanto o altri dettagli.
Ti aggiorno “

-Dal fronte gotha italico fankazzista idrofobo , “no no no no la pnn non esiste , le solite ciarle , la PNN non volerà mai “ :-)
E bbuuuuuuahhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Botoli italici del Mar Morto attaccatevi agli alettoni e ai cojoni di Musk ! ?

E sballo



https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff

--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff


except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:
That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

Agreed.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.

"Jeff Findley" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:
That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and
no respect for what is obviously quack science.

Agreed.

True. If it were truly being censored we wouldn't be able to publicly laugh
at it!

Jeff

--
Greg D. Moore http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net
IT Disaster Response -
https://www.amazon.com/Disaster-Resp...dp/1484221834/

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 12:14:54 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 14:20:11 -0400, Jeff Findley
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:34:46 +1000, Sylvia Else
wrote:

https://neolegesmotus.com/2021/04/17...subitam-class/

"The key point is: Subitam is capable of exceeding 4 grams of thrust. As
always, the power has been cut off quickly to avoid overheating, so this
is not the maximum thrust that it can supply."

So, it gets hot. Perhaps the thrust is from convection.

BTW, love the evidence offered - a video of a digital scale measuring
something.

If anyone's been invited to APEC over this, more fool APEC.

Sylvia.


you are not allowed to comment on our experiments as you are unable to
show evidence of your expertise in the matter.

That's just bull****. You're posting to a public forum. You're not
allowed to tell people they can't reply to you.

Jeff
except that her/your comments are totally ignored WRT the censorship
of our innovative space propulsion.
There's no censorship in a public group. There is however, disdain and no respect for what is obviously quack science.

You just don't know about what you are talking, and you show evidence
of lack of expertise in the matter.