Time, or Too Late, to Free Physics from Einstein Malignancy?

New Scientist: "Bye bye space-time: is it time to free physics from Einstein's legacy?" https://www.newscientist.com/article...steins-legacy/

"Bye bye space-time" implies "bye bye nonsensical constancy of the speed of light" and "bye bye gravitational waves (ripples in space-time)". The last "bye bye" is expected to be heartbreaking - LIGO conspirators will have to go to jail.

Invariable speed of light, variable wavelength: Einstein's malignant paradigm that killed physics (made it more insane than flat-earth myths).

Variable (as per Newton) speed of light, invariable wavelength: the new paradigm that could resurrect physics (if it's not too late).

I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

New Scientist: "Must we topple Einstein to let physics leap forward again?" https://newscientist.com/article/mg2...forward-again/

Einsteinians couldn't care less. They silently leave Einstein's sinking ship and promptly become experts in quantum mechanics, AI, biology, psychology, climate science etc. Only Kip Thorne is still on the ship - his money is too heavy:

https://c6.quickcachr.fotos.sapo.pt/...2108_dBrrH.png

Pentcho Valev