A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hagar played again



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 8th 17, 11:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Notroll2016
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 742
Default Hagar played again

Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?

  #2  
Old April 8th 17, 11:57 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Arc Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,480
Default Hagar played again

On Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 3:47:34 PM UTC-7, Notroll2016 wrote:
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?


no Hillary dropped off old gas containers to say, lookkie lookie, chem canisters, so Trump bombed them to help cover up Crookedhillary insatiable behavior to do crooked and insanoid, non-thought-out actions, all to benefit her bank accounts , off shore.

  #3  
Old April 9th 17, 11:31 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Richard A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Hagar played again

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make repairs problematical.
  #4  
Old April 9th 17, 03:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default Hagar played again



Richard A. wrote:
Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as
the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and
support buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway
unusable for a while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are
mines which can make repairs problematical.









What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.

Had hitlery been in the white house, you know she would have launched the
nukes already.
Third debate, she was already salivating at the chance of slamming her hand
down on that big red button.




  #5  
Old April 9th 17, 04:28 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 595
Default Hagar played again



"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

  #6  
Old April 9th 17, 07:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Notroll2016
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 742
Default Hagar played again



"Hägar" wrote in message
...



"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.

  #7  
Old April 9th 17, 09:44 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 595
Default Hagar played again

"Notroll2016" wrote in message news
"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.


Other than Liberal hysteria, Trump has no problems. He laughs at

you ass clowns and everything he does comes up roses. For example,
he just destroyed the "Putin is his best Buddy" talking points of the
Liberal Loons, by lobbing Tomahawks at their puppet in Syria. You
dip**** just haven't caught on yet, as usual.

  #8  
Old April 10th 17, 01:23 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Notroll2016
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 742
Default Hagar played again



"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Notroll2016" wrote in message news
"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Richard A." wrote in message
...

Notroll2016
Well, we spent $100 million on Tomahawk missiles and didn't do **** as the
airfield is again operational. So who was played the most? American
people? Trump supporters? Trump himself?
----------------

The word is that they didn't target the airfield. Just aircraft and support
buildings. We do have cluster bombs that can render a runway unusable for a
while. Especially when some of the sub munitions are mines which can make
repairs problematical.


*** You do realize that noTroll is a total moron and no explanation
on Earth would make sense to him, in particular the more subtle
nuances of the action directed at North Korea and China.
Let it suffice to say I'd rather see the money spent on Tomahawk
missiles, than on illegal Aliens and Democrat deadbeats.

***At best this was a lame attempt to distract us from Trump's problems.
Enough to fool you.


Other than Liberal hysteria, Trump has no problems. He laughs at

you ass clowns and everything he does comes up roses. For example,
he just destroyed the "Putin is his best Buddy" talking points of the
Liberal Loons, by lobbing Tomahawks at their puppet in Syria. You
dip**** just haven't caught on yet, as usual.

***************
Silly boi. You're a sucker.

  #9  
Old April 11th 17, 12:20 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Richard A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Hagar played again

Blast says
- show quoted text -
What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.
-----------

Military action against North Korea would not be as easy as an attack against Syria. We would risk counter attacks against not only US forces stationed along the border but the 10 million civilian lives in Seoul. Even without using nukes, North Korea has field artillery which is already aimed at these targets.

The only way to successfully engage the North would be a massive strike targeting their command and control infrastructure, radar and targeting, and then artillery and nuclear launch sites. This would be very very difficult to do without a massive build up of air and sea assets which would obviously be noted by the North. I'm talking thousands of cruise missiles and stealth aircraft. Followed up with B52s out of Guam as well as standard rockets and artillery from our ground forces. Difficult to pull that off
  #10  
Old April 12th 17, 05:29 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default Hagar played again



Richard A. wrote:
Blast says
- show quoted text -
What is being overlooked is the possibility that this was a message to
the
Chinese and mostly North Korea.
That Trump can and will take action if he's pushed.
-----------

Military action against North Korea would not be as easy as an attack
against Syria. We would risk counter attacks against not only US forces
stationed along the border but the 10 million civilian lives in Seoul.
Even without using nukes, North Korea has field artillery which is
already aimed at these targets.

The only way to successfully engage the North would be a massive strike
targeting their command and control infrastructure, radar and
targeting, and then artillery and nuclear launch sites. This would be
very very difficult to do without a massive build up of air and sea
assets which would obviously be noted by the North. I'm talking
thousands of cruise missiles and stealth aircraft. Followed up with
B52s out of Guam as well as standard rockets and artillery from our
ground forces. Difficult to pull that off








Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
I'm still not with the attack in Syria, but I'm just trying to hope that is
was a "necessary" option, as Trump is really losing a lot of my and others
support.
Still far better than had hitlery been in there, and would have surely
launced us into WW3 already.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would you admit that entropy might've played a role ? Craig Markwardt[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 February 22nd 15 11:04 PM
Einstein played dice with the universe Dave Johnson Astronomy Misc 68 March 21st 07 01:45 PM
Scouts played large part in Fossum's life Fred Goodwin, CMA Space Shuttle 2 July 13th 06 05:21 PM
Scouts played large part in Fossum's life Fred Goodwin, CMA Space Station 2 July 13th 06 05:21 PM
Study Suggests Component of Volcanic Gas May Have Played a SignificantRole in the Origins of Life on Earth (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 2 October 15th 04 08:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.