![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All,
What started with a curiosity to try to find what year my daughters Orange Tube C8 was made has turned into part time hobby. First thing I found was that Celestron's records don't extend back to the earlier C8s. Then I found someone who knew what the purchase date of his C8 was, a 1984 with a SN in the 800,000 range. My daughter's is in the 254,000. Several years later I found a 1973 with a known purchase date, SN 4936 2. I thought once I found an older scope, I could extrapolate and come up with an approximate year. Did not work! So now I am cruising the net and bugging people. I apologize, but if I may bug you, what I have started is a database consisting of: Serial Number: Serial Number Location: Fork Base, Secondary Mirror, Someplace else? Purchase Year: If Known Forks: Sandcast or Diecast Paint: Orange Peel, Smooth, Matte Burnt Orange, White Miscellaneous: Optics Enhanced Optics, Special Coatings, Starbright Label Celestron Pacific, Celestron International Secondary Mirror 3 or 4 screws AC Plug Round, Oval, Side or Underneath Anything else that may pinpoint it to an particular year. If, in a couple of years, I can get enough numbers, a pattern might start to make sense. Please feel free to completely ignore me. Thanks, Roy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Roy,
This is mine. And i'm note sure on the purchase year... Serial Number: 804081 Serial Number Location: Secondary Mirror Purchase Year: 1977? Forks: Sandcast Paint: Orange Peel Miscellaneous: Starbright Secondary Mirror 3 screws AC Plug Oval, Underneath -Florian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: To C8 Orange Tube Owners
From: Roy Dionne Date: 9/14/03 2:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: Hi All, What started with a curiosity to try to find what year my daughters Orange Tube C8 was made has turned into part time hobby. First thing I found was that Celestron's records don't extend back to the earlier C8s. Then I found someone who knew what the purchase date of his C8 was, a 1984 with a SN in the 800,000 range. My daughter's is in the 254,000. Several years later I found a 1973 with a known purchase date, SN 4936 2. I thought once I found an older scope, I could extrapolate and come up with an approximate year. Did not work! So now I am cruising the net and bugging people. I apologize, but if I may bug you, what I have started is a database consisting of: Serial Number: Serial Number Location: Fork Base, Secondary Mirror, Someplace else? Purchase Year: If Known Forks: Sandcast or Diecast Paint: Orange Peel, Smooth, Matte Burnt Orange, White Miscellaneous: Optics Enhanced Optics, Special Coatings, Starbright Label Celestron Pacific, Celestron International Secondary Mirror 3 or 4 screws AC Plug Round, Oval, Side or Underneath Anything else that may pinpoint it to an particular year. If, in a couple of years, I can get enough numbers, a pattern might start to make sense. Please feel free to completely ignore me. Thanks, Roy ******************** Does the fork arms have holes in them??? Chas P. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Chuck,
It was corresponding with Rod that gave me the idea to start the database. The serial numbers seemed to follow no logic. He agrees. By just looking at one or two isolated numbers they make no sense. But then you couldn't identify a beach by two grains of sand. :-) (Or probably, with technology, you could. Poor analogy.) Chuck Taylor wrote: "Roy Dionne" wrote in message ... Hi All, What started with a curiosity to try to find what year my daughters Orange Tube C8 was made has turned into part time hobby. First thing I found was that Celestron's records don't extend back to the earlier C8s. Hi Roy, Have you met Rod? You can find him here on saa and at: http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html He's the CAT expert! Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try the Lunar Observing Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Tom,
One I had already been in contact with and have sent my "form" letter to the other. Roy Tom Hole "Roy Dionne" wrote in message ... Hi All, What started with a curiosity to try to find what year my daughters Orange Tube C8 was made has turned into part time hobby. First thing I found was that Celestron's records don't extend back to the earlier C8s. There are 2 of them that just popped up for sale on Astromart. May want to email them. Tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't quite understand the term "die
cast" anyway. It's my understanding that the old sand cast forks were heavier than the later die cast ones. I THINK most of 'em had real holes through 'em. I'm going over my old orange C8 looking for the serial number, and having a hard time finding it... I'll post my answers pretty soon... Marty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just found a thingy looking through old paper about sand and die
castings. It's in "Tuthill's Twenty-Two Telescope Tips" Copyright 1978, and it says: 18. DIE CASTINGS VERSUS SAND CASTINGS In general, if die castings instead of sand castings can be used in telescope construction the resulting casting is denser with less porosity or holes. It is also made to closer tolerances for precision. For the best use of material that can be placed in the correct structural form without excess weight the use of die castings is very much recommended in engineering circles. In general, sand casting do not provide the fine finish or precision of die castings. there, FWIW Marty |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In general, sand casting do
not provide the fine finish or precision of die castings. Hi Marty: Waalll...maybe not. But sandcasting worked fine on the C8, and SHORE was purty! ;-) Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod was replying to me:
(this gets so confusing...) In general, sand casting do not provide the fine finish or precision of die castings. Hi Marty: Waalll...maybe not. But sandcasting worked fine on the C8, and SHORE was purty! ;-) Peace, Rod Mollise I don't know much of the difference myself. I can remember seeing used C8s selling years ago, and the fact that they had sand castings was used as a PLUS. Beats me, Marty |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adapter plate for borg tube rings and eq 4 type mount | John | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 15th 03 08:36 AM |
Short Tube Catadioptric Equatorial Reflector..help needed please | Dawson | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 29th 03 01:21 PM |
Dob collimation/focus tube slop problem solved. | Robert Hertel | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 27th 03 05:06 PM |
Orange SCT mystique should DIE! | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 18th 03 11:50 AM |
2" extension tube was: Long 2" to 1.25" adapter | Joe X | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 10th 03 09:50 PM |