How does the Tokamak work?

"Charles Cagle" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article , Cyril Meynier
wrote:

le Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:58:31 GMT, Charles Cagle a
pensé, ce qui, en soi, l'a déjà classé dans une petite élite. Pour
être plus précis, il/elle a pensé que :

In reality it doesn't work. Or rather it works quite well as a device
used to extract money from taxpayers so as to keep an army of welfare
queens in white coats employed so that they can send their kids to
college without ever really having provided anything of value for this
nation.

One could say exactly the same about wind power 30 years ago, about
railways in 1820, rocketry in 1950, nuclear (fission) power in 1960,
computers in 1940, and so on.

Absolute bull**** response
[snip, seulement pour sauver nos pauvres cerveaux]
(en anglais, je m'excuse) Don't mind him, he can't help hurling insults to
anybody who isn't himself... ending up to excoriate some of the most
cognoscenti here about, as you probably noticed from other (genuinely
qualified) posts.
(hmmm, feels a bit better now. Apologies for the "venting" :-)

Slan,
Frances

In article , Frances
wrote:

"Charles Cagle" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article , Cyril Meynier
wrote:

le Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:58:31 GMT, Charles Cagle a
pensé, ce qui, en soi, l'a déjà classé dans une petite élite. Pour
être plus précis, il/elle a pensé que :

In reality it doesn't work. Or rather it works quite well as a device
used to extract money from taxpayers so as to keep an army of welfare
queens in white coats employed so that they can send their kids to
college without ever really having provided anything of value for this
nation.

One could say exactly the same about wind power 30 years ago, about
railways in 1820, rocketry in 1950, nuclear (fission) power in 1960,
computers in 1940, and so on.

Absolute bull**** response
[snip, seulement pour sauver nos pauvres cerveaux]
(en anglais, je m'excuse) Don't mind him, he can't help hurling insults to
anybody who isn't himself... ending up to excoriate some of the most
cognoscenti here about, as you probably noticed from other (genuinely
qualified) posts.
(hmmm, feels a bit better now. Apologies for the "venting" :-)

Slan,
Frances

Fish and reptiles (snakes, etc.) have vents. Nice to see that you have
identified yourself.

CC

The tokamak DOESN'T work, or we would be using them all over the place.
Cagle's mind does not work either, or perhaps there just isn't a mind there at
all.
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)

~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~


"Charles Cagle" a écrit dans le message de
...
snip
(hmmm, feels a bit better now. Apologies for the "venting" :-)

Slan,
Frances

Fish and reptiles (snakes, etc.) have vents. Nice to see that you have
identified yourself.

CC

Wow... Charles !

Plasma fusion didn't work. But a lot of physicists was convinced that it
will work at the time by a forceful propaganda of some clever con artist
physicist in the top level. Where money goes, justification can easily
follow.

Mass deception of some kind.

In the future, science project must be evaluated by a group of pro and con
scisntists to make sure people's valuable tax is not wasted to something
that will bring nothing.


"Frances" wrote in message
...
"Charles Cagle" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article , Frances
wrote:

"Charles Cagle" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article , Cyril
Meynier
wrote:

le Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:58:31 GMT, Charles Cagle

a
pensé, ce qui, en soi, l'a déjà classé dans une petite élite. Pour
être plus précis, il/elle a pensé que :

In reality it doesn't work. Or rather it works quite well as a
device
used to extract money from taxpayers so as to keep an army of
welfare
queens in white coats employed so that they can send their kids
to
college without ever really having provided anything of value for
this
nation.

One could say exactly the same about wind power 30 years ago,
about
railways in 1820, rocketry in 1950, nuclear (fission) power in
1960,
computers in 1940, and so on.

Absolute bull**** response
[snip, seulement pour sauver nos pauvres cerveaux]
(en anglais, je m'excuse) Don't mind him, he can't help hurling
insults
to
anybody who isn't himself... ending up to excoriate some of the most
cognoscenti here about, as you probably noticed from other (genuinely
qualified) posts.
(hmmm, feels a bit better now. Apologies for the "venting" :-)

Slan,
Frances

Fish and reptiles (snakes, etc.) have vents. Nice to see that you have
identified yourself.

CC
Well now, this will be the end of it (ooh no, CC will always want to have
the last word! Therefore *Plonk!*): what's wrong with fish and reptiles
(and
thanx 4 explaining that snakes should be in that species, ih ih!)??? And,
oh, also nuclear reactors have very important ventings, can I claim to be
one, please? I'd love it.
Adieu

Supertech ), in article , wrote:
(...)
In the future, science project must be evaluated by a group of pro and con
scisntists to make sure people's valuable tax is not wasted to something
that will bring nothing.

Heh. HA! Not as long as politicians are. What is politics, anyway, the
world's second oldest profession? Trust Og. Og play with you in cave.
Og put chicken in your pot before he start ****ing you. Og never ****
with anyone else before, so Og not get your **** dirty. Trust Og.

In article JSJ6b.2355$f7.173333@localhost, ('')
wrote:

Supertech ), in article
, wrote:
(...)
In the future, science project must be evaluated by a group of pro and con
scisntists to make sure people's valuable tax is not wasted to something
that will bring nothing.

Heh. HA! Not as long as politicians are. What is politics, anyway, the
world's second oldest profession? Trust Og. Og play with you in cave.
Og put chicken in your pot before he start ****ing you. Og never ****
with anyone else before, so Og not get your **** dirty. Trust Og.

I see that you have the fairly early transcript...