![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sometimes when galaxies merge, the supermassive black hole of one galaxy
doesn't merge with the other galaxy's black hole but instead it gets kicked out of the system altogether. This is especially likely in the case of a simultaneous three-way or higher galactic merger. A "hypercompact stellar system" is the coterie of stars left attached to and orbiting the kicked-out supermassive. There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Yousuf Khan New Kind Of Astronomical Object Around Black Hole: Living Fossil Records 'Supermassive' Kick "“You can measure how big the kick was by measuring how fast the stars are moving around the black hole,” says Merritt, professor of physics at RIT. “Only stars orbiting faster than the kick velocity remain attached to the black hole after the kick. These stars carry with them a kind of fossil record of the kick, even after the black hole has slowed down. In principle, you can reconstruct the properties of the kick, which is nice because there would be no other way to do it.”" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0709170759.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yousuf Khan wrote:
[...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 7:26*am, eric gisse wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] It wasn't Yousuf who said that but a scientist. Scientists like to make wild assumptions. One third of galaxies are ones that collided elliptic galaxies and each made of two galaxies in the past. Since elliptic galaxies are sums of two galaxies, they also represent the largest of galaxies. Some may have three or much more number of galaxies crashing, though a crash won't happen sooner than once in three billion years, and the Universe is not that old. Sum billions of random galaxies, one will find 50 galaxies crashing somewhere and central black holes flying off in all directions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 8:51*am, gb wrote:
On Dec 12, 7:26*am, eric gisse wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] It wasn't Yousuf who said that but a scientist. Scientists like to make wild assumptions. One third of galaxies are ones that collided elliptic galaxies and each made of two galaxies in the past. Since elliptic galaxies are sums of two galaxies, they also represent the largest of galaxies. Some may have three or much more number of galaxies crashing, though a crash won't happen sooner than once in three billion years, and the Universe is not that old. Sum billions of random galaxies, one will find 50 galaxies crashing somewhere and central black holes flying off in all directions. Somewhere in a parallel reality, the three smaller dwarfs were stabbed 12 times in a forest. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 8:55*am, gb wrote:
On Dec 12, 8:51*am, gb wrote: On Dec 12, 7:26*am, eric gisse wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] It wasn't Yousuf who said that but a scientist. Scientists like to make wild assumptions. One third of galaxies are ones that collided elliptic galaxies and each made of two galaxies in the past. Since elliptic galaxies are sums of two galaxies, they also represent the largest of galaxies. Some may have three or much more number of galaxies crashing, though a crash won't happen sooner than once in three billion years, and the Universe is not that old. Sum billions of random galaxies, one will find 50 galaxies crashing somewhere and central black holes flying off in all directions. Somewhere in a parallel reality, the three smaller dwarfs were stabbed 12 times in a forest. Parallel Universes are strange. Arriving into them always has this type of reality to them. Snow White and the four dwarfs. There were seven dwarfs once. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 8:26*am, eric gisse wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] Besides which, seeing fully-formed galaxies back to as far as they have seen them pretty much invalidates the whole theory of how black holes form. But whatever- fantasize on, the both of you. john |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 8:26*am, eric gisse wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] Black hole theory was pretty much invalidated when fully-formed galaxies were observed as far out as we can see. It's a theory only morons could accept, anyway. But you two keep fantasizing. john |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
eric gisse wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. Think all of the way back to the Milky Way's original formation after the BB, it grew to this size by swallowing several dwarf galaxies (supposedly). There may have been thousands of dwarfs that went into making the Milky Way. Each of those dwarfs contained at least an intermediate sized supermassive, some of which may have merged with the main supermassive, some of which may have been kicked out. If even 10% of them were kicked out, that would still be hundreds of supermassives floating around, masquerading as globular clusters in the halo. Yousuf Khan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 12:05*pm, john wrote:
On Dec 12, 8:26*am, eric gisse wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. [...] Black hole theory was pretty much invalidated when fully-formed galaxies were observed as far out as we can see. It's a theory only morons could accept, anyway. But you two keep fantasizing. The new hardline theory of black holes is "buttsuck the hard line in the buttcrack", fully formed dark worm in the back between the ass. Dark worm theory says it is a hardline extremist reality as far as we can see. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 1:01*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
eric gisse wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: [...] There may be hundreds of these objects floating around our galaxy, and they may have already been detected in sky surveys but mistaken to be globular clusters. The speed at which the stars orbit the supermassive may be a record of how fast this supermassive was kicked out in the first place. Hundreds? On what is this wild assed guess based upon? This is a spiral galaxy, which severely limits the number of galaxies this one could have collided with. Think all of the way back to the Milky Way's original formation after the BB, it grew to this size by swallowing several dwarf galaxies (supposedly). There may have been thousands of dwarfs that went into making the Milky Way. Each of those dwarfs contained at least an intermediate sized supermassive, some of which may have merged with the main supermassive, some of which may have been kicked out. If even 10% of them were kicked out, that would still be hundreds of supermassives floating around, masquerading as globular clusters in the halo. * * * * Yousuf Khan The problem with professional astronomers is that they can't even tell that Pluto is not a planet. "Nothing can come close to the big" excludes that Pluto is valid if it enters Neptune's orbit. Yet we have WASP-17, a planet which crosses if not all other smaller planets in that solar system. So how many planets does that solar system has, one? Of course it has all those planets as planets. Pluto and the two other small planets too are planets. That is my metaphore with murdering the three small dwarfs in the Snow White story. The story you tell is classic of astronomer stories that hundreds of such black holes may be found in our galaxy. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Supermassive Black Holes Come Together | Hannu Poropudas | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 4th 07 04:28 PM |
Paper: Active galactic nuclei as scaled-up Galactic black holes | Robert Karl Stonjek | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 24th 06 01:54 AM |
Supermassive Black Holes. | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 7 | May 22nd 06 04:22 AM |
Early supermassive black holes | Bob Schmall | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 24th 04 02:37 PM |
Supermassive black holes | David | Science | 3 | January 28th 04 07:51 PM |