![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I am one of those guys who bought a meade etx 125 ec WITHOUT autoStar. The idea of not buying autostar was to be able to learn by virtue of doing things the hard way. Assumptions : (pls correct me if i am wrong) 1. What i know roughly is that if i polar align my telescope then i can just dial in the address of a star in my telescope and voila ( firstly is this assumption correct )... 2. if you have autostar then you just need to "show" it two stars and it calculates all the relative positions, after which you ask for a star it calculates it and takes the telescope there. ( no alignment of any sort required - other then it being on flat surface ) what i want to know 1. is there a software by which i do the what GOTO achieves. go to wellknown stars, note the setting circle values on my telescope, enter it in the magic software and then i ask for a known address and it tells me what should the values on my settings circles should be ... Realise this is without polar alignment..(i have telescope with poor man's ALT-Azimuth mount) 2. what's the use of setting circles w/o polar aligning the telescope. any help in this regards will be greatly appreciated. -Premal (premal_jhaveri*hotmail*com) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. is there a software by which i do the what GOTO achieves. go to
wellknown stars, note the setting circle values on my telescope, enter it in the magic software and then i ask for a known address and it Hi: 1, I've seen a program like this for the Palm. But you really don't need it. I believe the RA circle on the 125 is not driven, so what you do is just reset it to the correct value before moving to the next object (as you know, you must set-up the RA circle by putting the telescope on a star of known RA and adjusting the circle to read this value when you start observing). 2. None. In order for analog circles to be accurate at all, you must be precisely polar aligned. With the long focal lengh of the 125, especially, you need a dead-on polar alignment to have a prayer of getting objects in the field of an eyepiece. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Rod said.
You are going to have a tough time indeed using the RA circle in azimuth mode. Won't work without a method to convert RA to AZ, and DEC to ALT. The cheapest solution I can think of is to forget the circles, get a Rigel QuickFinder and a star chart. Then learn star hopping. If you have trouble seeing stars down to magnitude 4.5 in the QuickFinder, then go with a 9x50 correct image finder (either straight through or right angle). If you go with a right angle (RACI) unit, you'll still need a way to "beed" in on the first star in your hop. Once the first star is aquired, a RACI is all you need. You'll also want the widest field eyepiece possible. The maximum field of view you can get out of the 1.25" focuser on the ETX-125 is with an eyepiece that has a 27mm field stop (32mm Plossl at the lower end, 24mm Panoptic at the higher end, just to name a few). Best of luck, and FWIW, there's no shame in using Autostar. Star hopping is an extemely useful skill and educational process, but training your eyes to better see through your telescope is just as important. I have nights where star hopping feels more like frustration than pleasure, and time I should be spending observing is being consumed by aquiring the target (and then manually tracking it can also be a distraction to getting the most out of the observation time). When that happens, rather than call it a night and grab the TV remote, I'll roll out my second scope which has Digital Setting Circles and an RA clock drive. -- -Stephen Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You are going to have a tough time indeed using the RA circle in azimuth mode. Won't work without a method to convert RA to AZ, and DEC to ALT. The cheapest solution I can think of is to forget the circles, get a Rigel QuickFinder and a star chart. Then learn star hopping. This would obviously be my first choice too, as you all know, old Jon is to primative to consider too much electronics. However these is another reasonable solution: Planetarium Software and a "Palm Pilot." IT fits on your hand and will provide the AZ and Alt coordinates (or the RA and DEC) for your location. It is like a mini version of Cartes du Ciel, has lots of features and a nice data base. I have been using it instead of star charts and it works quite nicely. There is a link to the Planetarium site on Rod's website, members.aol.com/rmollise One thing to remember, the Zire is the cheapest of the Palms and will run the program but it does not have a back light so it will be unusable at night. jon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jon Isaacs" wrote in message
... One thing to remember, the Zire is the cheapest of the Palms and will run the program but it does not have a back light so it will be unusable at night. Wouldn't it work with a red flashlight? -Stephen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon Isaacs wrote:
One thing to remember, the Zire is the cheapest of the Palms and will run the program but it does not have a back light so it will be unusable at night. Wouldn't it work with a red flashlight? Possibly but it would be a bit of added complication that is unnecessary. If one had a Zire it would be worth giving it a shot, my intent was to warn those who might be considering a purchase of this weakness. I haven't used the palms in this fashion, but wouldn't a backlight be a distraction? IOW, maybe the (cheap) Zire is the way to go. -- RM Mentock No se puede vivir sin amar |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I haven't used the palms in this fashion, but wouldn't a backlight be a distraction? IOW, maybe the (cheap) Zire is the way to go. Probably depends on how dark your skies are. I use a Handspring Visor Deluxe, the brightness is adjustable and it does not seem to be a problem for me. One can alway put some filter paper over the screen. The screen is can be setup so the screen background is black and the stars and are illuminated, much like the night sky. What I really like is that I can have the thing in my pocket and just whip it out and when I need it without resorting to charts. jon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And what application do you use on your Visor?
If you are using 2Sky, how do you get to the search function? 2Sky says it has a search function that allows you to enter the first few letters of an object and the application will go to that object -- I can't find the search function. I have played around with 2Sky and find it little more than a toy -- am I missing something, or, is there a better application? Thanks. -- ---- JAS "Jon Isaacs" wrote in message ... I haven't used the palms in this fashion, but wouldn't a backlight be a distraction? IOW, maybe the (cheap) Zire is the way to go. Probably depends on how dark your skies are. I use a Handspring Visor Deluxe, the brightness is adjustable and it does not seem to be a problem for me. One can alway put some filter paper over the screen. The screen is can be setup so the screen background is black and the stars and are illuminated, much like the night sky. What I really like is that I can have the thing in my pocket and just whip it out and when I need it without resorting to charts. jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Remembering | Phil Wheeler | Amateur Astronomy | 68 | August 14th 03 04:47 PM |
Digital Setting Circles Vs. GOTO....Which and Why?? | gologa | Amateur Astronomy | 17 | July 31st 03 09:30 PM |
Setting up an EQ mount, rookie question | Hans Johansson \(SM0IMJ\) | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 13th 03 05:37 PM |