The status quo of "Mailgate: Message not available"

This time I'd been getting all of those nifty "Your post was successful"
worth of Usenet conformation feedbacks, and yet not a one of my
contributions shows up in the topic index. Apparently our silly Jewish
run or rather stealth moderated Usenet is once again having been
selectively terminated as of 6:57 am. Whereas a few other groups were
still running full speed ahead as of 7:44 am, alt.politics.bush was
still flying as of 8:41 am, and apparently the God of Usenet likes
"alt.atheism" because, he/she had kept that group afloat until 8:28 am,
along with "alt.religion.islam" as being good for 8:10 am, with
"alt.bible" still kicking butt at 9:20 am, and "soc.culture.usa" still
breathing as of 8:29 am.

BTW; do take notice as to all of those pesky Mailgate.org "Mailgate:
Message not available" topics, and of taking a bit further notice as to
what those sorts of topics were about. Most of my Mailgate topic index
is primarily those listed as "Mailgate: Message not available", but you
can often still open those topics to see what's worth hiding from us
clients and otherwise totally excluded away from the public's outside
view.

Moon landing hoax... I found the fatal flaw.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...rad+guth&hl=en
Dear MI/NSA spook Ed,
Yes we most certainly can place Venus within that very crystal clear and
dark sky at the time of those NASA/Apollo landings, just as well as any
basic 2D solar system simulator (including those of NASA) can more than
substantiate upon that exact location of Venus, though it gets
especially impressive if you're utilizing a fully interactive 3D
simulator that'll put the viewer and whatever FOV(frame of view) as
actually situated upon the moon. Our NASA and many others have those 3D
simulators that'll put that FOV at each and every landing site, as well
as their having the supercomputer for accomplishing a fully interactive
animation, exactly as though you're the actual orbiting or EVA astronaut
holding that camera along with it's unfiltered optics and containing
such film that was more spectrum sensitive than any human eye.

IF you can in fact manage to record those deep blue oceans of mother
Earth along with a little something of the moon, or of their equipment
and/or especially of any EVA astronaut within a given FOV (as
NASA/Apollo supposedly accomplished just exactly that from orbit and
otherwise multiple times from the deck), then you sure as freaking hell
would have recorded that nearby crescent of Venus, as especially more
vibrant looking than the naked eye because of their using such
unfiltered optics and of that Kodak film that was actually rather
near-UV(violet) and even a little UV-a sensitive to a much greater
extent than the human eye. It's that simple.

Warhol, Plisek and so many others (including myself) have been right all
along.

However, finding just those right words and of all the best available
science, or even of those regular laws of physics that'll tell an
entirely different story is simply not good enough for putting all of
these NASA/Apollo rusemasters down for good, as they and of their borg
like collective of brown-nosed clowns merely avoid, exclude and/or
whenever possible banish whatever on the fly, not to mention having been
sharing their expertise at delivering as much spermware/****ware into
your PC as they can muster.

Besides the rather unusual lack of Venus and a few other DR(dynamic
range) worthy items that should have been recorded, there's actually any
number of those Kodak moments telling us the truth, as well as per those
pesky laws of physics having been otherwise telling us the whole truth
and nothing but the truth about our naked and somewhat salty old moon
that's more than a little TBI lethal to our frail DNA.

The color spectrum of such a raw solar illumination is simply NOT going
to be that of such a terrestrial looking spectrum worth of color
saturation, such as provided by their xenon arc lamp spectrum that's
very terrestrial looking and therefore without hardly any UV to speak
of.

Their hocus-pocus magic worth of surface tension, of that far better
than nicely vacuum dried, sub-frozen and otherwise double IR/FIR roasted
to death worth of such absolutely bone dry and yet rather nicely
clumping with such an absolutely terrific amount of surface tension
worthy moon dirt was apparently far more extra special (meaning
terrestrial like) than anyone had thought possible. Their moon dirt was
also without a breath of static and otherwise so nicely reflecting, in
that it had a very guano island look worth of albedo of far better than
0.5 for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye could see, in many
locations reaching an impressive albedo of 0.75.

Perhaps that also explains as to why their hocus-pocus controlled (w/o
benefit of momentum reaction wheels) worth of down-range and soft
landing thrust having displaced next to nothing, and perhaps also why
Venus was simply nowhere in sight, even though it was in fact
unavoidably so nearby and very much there to behold, as would have been
rather easily recorded within the available DR(dynamic range) and
FOV(field of view) of most any number of such unfiltered Kodak moments.

That physically dark moon environment is simply TBI(total body
irradiation) hotter and thereby more potentially lethal than any Van
Allen badlands you can point at. There's simply no possible way in hell
such Kodak film survived for such an extended amount of time, especially
without such poorly shielded film having taken significant gamma and
Xray hits.

Those MythBusters or any 5th grader with a PC or MAC at their disposal
need only to run the likes of CELESTIA, or something less or better than
3D simulation in order to more than prove this point, that we've been
entirely snookered by the right stuff of those that'll knowingly lie and
otherwise perpetrate whatever on behalf of their government, as well as
on behalf of whatever faith-based cult or chapter of Skull and Bones
they belong to.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

On 15 Apr, 12:47, "Brad Guth" wrote:
This time I'd been getting all of those nifty "Your post was successful"
worth of Usenet conformation feedbacks, and yet not a one of my
contributions shows up in the topic index. Apparently our silly Jewish
run or rather stealth moderated Usenet is once again having been
selectively terminated as of 6:57 am. Whereas a few other groups were
still running full speed ahead as of 7:44 am, alt.politics.bush was
still flying as of 8:41 am, and apparently the God of Usenet likes
"alt.atheism" because, he/she had kept that group afloat until 8:28 am,
along with "alt.religion.islam" as being good for 8:10 am, with
"alt.bible" still kicking butt at 9:20 am, and "soc.culture.usa" still
breathing as of 8:29 am.

BTW; do take notice as to all of those pesky Mailgate.org "Mailgate:
Message not available" topics, and of taking a bit further notice as to
what those sorts of topics were about. Most of my Mailgate topic index
is primarily those listed as "Mailgate: Message not available", but you
can often still open those topics to see what's worth hiding from us
clients and otherwise totally excluded away from the public's outside
view.

Moon landing hoax... I found the fatal flaw.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/726e40...
Dear MI/NSA spook Ed,
Yes we most certainly can place Venus within that very crystal clear and
dark sky at the time of those NASA/Apollo landings, just as well as any
basic 2D solar system simulator (including those of NASA) can more than
substantiate upon that exact location of Venus, though it gets
especially impressive if you're utilizing a fully interactive 3D
simulator that'll put the viewer and whatever FOV(frame of view) as
actually situated upon the moon. Our NASA and many others have those 3D
simulators that'll put that FOV at each and every landing site, as well
as their having the supercomputer for accomplishing a fully interactive
animation, exactly as though you're the actual orbiting or EVA astronaut
holding that camera along with it's unfiltered optics and containing
such film that was more spectrum sensitive than any human eye.

IF you can in fact manage to record those deep blue oceans of mother
Earth along with a little something of the moon, or of their equipment
and/or especially of any EVA astronaut within a given FOV (as
NASA/Apollo supposedly accomplished just exactly that from orbit and
otherwise multiple times from the deck), then you sure as freaking hell
would have recorded that nearby crescent of Venus, as especially more
vibrant looking than the naked eye because of their using such
unfiltered optics and of that Kodak film that was actually rather
near-UV(violet) and even a little UV-a sensitive to a much greater
extent than the human eye. It's that simple.

Warhol, Plisek and so many others (including myself) have been right all
along.

However, finding just those right words and of all the best available
science, or even of those regular laws of physics that'll tell an
entirely different story is simply not good enough for putting all of
these NASA/Apollo rusemasters down for good, as they and of their borg
like collective of brown-nosed clowns merely avoid, exclude and/or
whenever possible banish whatever on the fly, not to mention having been
sharing their expertise at delivering as much spermware/****ware into
your PC as they can muster.

Besides the rather unusual lack of Venus and a few other DR(dynamic
range) worthy items that should have been recorded, there's actually any
number of those Kodak moments telling us the truth, as well as per those
pesky laws of physics having been otherwise telling us the whole truth
and nothing but the truth about our naked and somewhat salty old moon
that's more than a little TBI lethal to our frail DNA.

The color spectrum of such a raw solar illumination is simply NOT going
to be that of such a terrestrial looking spectrum worth of color
saturation, such as provided by their xenon arc lamp spectrum that's
very terrestrial looking and therefore without hardly any UV to speak
of.

Their hocus-pocus magic worth of surface tension, of that far better
than nicely vacuum dried, sub-frozen and otherwise double IR/FIR roasted
to death worth of such absolutely bone dry and yet rather nicely
clumping with such an absolutely terrific amount of surface tension
worthy moon dirt was apparently far more extra special (meaning
terrestrial like) than anyone had thought possible. Their moon dirt was
also without a breath of static and otherwise so nicely reflecting, in
that it had a very guano island look worth of albedo of far better than
0.5 for as far as their unfiltered Kodak eye could see, in many
locations reaching an impressive albedo of 0.75.

Perhaps that also explains as to why their hocus-pocus controlled (w/o
benefit of momentum reaction wheels) worth of down-range and soft
landing thrust having displaced next to nothing, and perhaps also why
Venus was simply nowhere in sight, even though it was in fact
unavoidably so nearby and very much there to behold, as would have been
rather easily recorded within the available DR(dynamic range) and
FOV(field of view) of most any number of such unfiltered Kodak moments.

That physically dark moon environment is simply TBI(total body
irradiation) hotter and thereby more potentially lethal than any Van
Allen badlands you can point at. There's simply no possible way in hell
such Kodak film survived for such an extended amount of time, especially
without such poorly shielded film having taken significant gamma and
Xray hits.

Those MythBusters or any 5th grader with a PC or MAC at their disposal
need only to run the likes of CELESTIA, or something less or better than
3D simulation in order to more than prove this point, that we've been
entirely snookered by the right stuff of those that'll knowingly lie and
otherwise perpetrate whatever on behalf of their government, as well as
on behalf of whatever faith-based cult or chapter of Skull and Bones
they belong to.
-BradGuth

Part-2

So, apparently the telling of those mainstream status quo lies upon
lies, or as having been excluding evidence that doesn't fit your cozy
mindset, or such as otherwise allowing all that's derived from those
of your kind and GW Bush, is supposedly not being a "racist, repulsive
dolt, a scientific ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob"?

"Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based"
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...a34 16220a639
Bill Snyder:
"It just marks them as capable of reading your posts."

I can't be at all su "It just marks them"?
Was that one an encrypted message from your very own naysay black
hole?

I'm afraid that Usenet is not entirely robo clean, whereas instead
it's capably moderated and/or stealth managed from those having the
proper master codes and/or having those nifty back-door and/or special-
interest tricks at their disposal. Unlike specifically moderated
groups, those supposedly unmoderated groups as served by way of
computers as such, are not capable of AI running amuck, whereas it
takes the expertise of individuals in charge of allowing, diverting
and/or skewing each and every byte of whatever gets posted.

Phony topic index stacking and/or simply not giving proper index
updates to those you folks hate the most is clearly what being e-KKK,
Third Reich or just what being plain nasty old-fart extra special
bigoted is all about, isn't it.

Some Usenet servers are of course much worse off than others, few if
any are stand alone 'free-for-all' robo-usenet servers without human
factors. In other words, Usenet is exactly whatever those in charge
intend and/or allow it to be, including those client specific
capabilities that makes it possible for certain individuals or entire
groups to being excluded and/or made to think quite differently than
the honest facts represent, and that's exactly what most any
government and of their faith-based or big-business (including their
own cloak and dagger MI/NSA or MIB) puppeteers insist upon maintaining
as such. Only a damn fool (such as anyone supporting GW Bush or just
being naysay for the Old Testament gipper) thinks otherwise.
-
Brad Guth