A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Do they really think this is better than the original?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 07, 06:19 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Mick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Do they really think this is better than the original?


NIST claims that a newly developed de-blur technique has improved
the Tadpole Galaxy image from HST:

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/t..._1207.htm#apex

Look what APEX has done to the nucleus! All the've done is make
the noise more visible....


  #2  
Old January 15th 07, 06:41 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Do they really think this is better than the original?

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 06:19:52 GMT, "Mick" wrote:

NIST claims that a newly developed de-blur technique has improved
the Tadpole Galaxy image from HST:

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/t..._1207.htm#apex

Look what APEX has done to the nucleus! All the've done is make
the noise more visible....


For the most part, the intent behind HST images isn't aesthetics.
Certainly, the sharpened image enhances many structural details.

All sharpening algorithms enhance noise. If you are studying a specific
object, you will normally apply a variety of filters to the image. Each
will help you tease out otherwise unseen details. Most of those images
that you are studying will be unaesthetic.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reviving Wegener's original Centrifugal hypothesis & original pulsarhypothesis; history of science a_plutonium Astronomy Misc 0 October 16th 06 09:54 AM
original topic: (4m/s^2)/2s = ? Art Deco Astronomy Misc 6 August 6th 06 04:25 PM
[FWD] Rutan's WK/SS1 design not that original after all? OM History 1 July 1st 04 03:28 PM
Original 7 Group Shot... OM History 8 June 23rd 04 07:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.