![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back
to earth? Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Gaff" wrote in
. uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. --Damon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... "Brian Gaff" wrote in . uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. --Damon No doubt about that. George |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the new RTV comming on board next year, capeible or such a task?
Jim "George" wrote in message .. . "Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... "Brian Gaff" wrote in . uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. --Damon No doubt about that. George |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message et... Is the new RTV comming on board next year, capeible or such a task? Jim Would that be the Amadas Coach, or the feathelight Prevost: http://www.rvonline.com/motorhomes-5...d=1&SortedBy=4 lol George "George" wrote in message .. . "Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... "Brian Gaff" wrote in . uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. --Damon No doubt about that. George |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No RTV is made by Dow Corning, its an advanced series of adhesives and
fillers. :-) Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________ "George" wrote in message .. . "Jim" wrote in message et... Is the new RTV comming on board next year, capeible or such a task? Jim Would that be the Amadas Coach, or the feathelight Prevost: http://www.rvonline.com/motorhomes-5...d=1&SortedBy=4 lol George "George" wrote in message .. . "Damon Hill" wrote in message 31... "Brian Gaff" wrote in . uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. --Damon No doubt about that. George |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damon Hill wrote:
"Brian Gaff" wrote in . uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. It's probably cheaper to just return the items that need analyzing in a lab on the ground, or just the data, and toss the rest into a lonely ocean in a controlled manner. The expense of returning a large item back for reuse probably costs the same or more than just building a new replacement. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() robert casey wrote: [...] It's probably cheaper to just return the items that need analyzing in a lab on the ground, or just the data, and toss the rest into a lonely ocean in a controlled manner. The expense of returning a large item back for reuse probably costs the same or more than just building a new replacement. That may be true if you're only interested in reuse, but there is still a need for post-mortem analysis of some devices to learn how to make a better one for next time. Some of those items are large. And the CMGs may be an example where the (pre-retirement) cost of bringing one back is less than the cost of fabricating a new one because of unusual fabication issues. Post-retirement, the costs go up for a while, but maybe the next try of the inflatable reentry vehicle (Russian SLBMs willing) will lower the cost again. /dps |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:19:39 -0600, Damon Hill
puked: "Brian Gaff" wrote in .uk: Without the Shuttle how could any large experiment or item be brought back to earth? Short answer, it can't. If it could be disassembled into much smaller pieces, the most important parts might be returnable in Soyuz or Orion--maybe. Potentially an aeroshell could do the job, but it'd be expensive and there's not much demand for such a service at present. The capability wasn't used all that much with Shuttle, other than SpaceHabs. If a demand develops, I suppose a capability will be developed, if only as a cargo-only version of Orion or something similar. We're going to miss Shuttle's capabilities, on occasion. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we have landed some relatively large experiments on Mars... -- lab~rat :-) Do you want polite or do you want sincere? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 3rd 06 05:53 AM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 3rd 06 05:53 AM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 14th 06 05:11 PM |
could Earth survive if most stuff in the universe when poof!??? | Sam Wormley | Astronomy Misc | 6 | June 14th 06 12:57 PM |