Black Hole Critical Mass Is ???

I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?

Double-A

Double-A wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?
Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck
of a large singularity!

Think about that for a moment.

My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert.

Cordially,

Raving

Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?
Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck
of a large singularity!

Think about that for a moment.

My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert.

Cordially,

Raving


Raving,

The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very
center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large,
but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the
singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of
light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to
contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted
inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than
the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that
a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think
that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius
projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a
Schwarzschild circumference.

Double-A

Double-A wrote:
Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?
Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck
of a large singularity!

Think about that for a moment.

My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert.

Cordially,

Raving


Raving,

The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very
center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large,
but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the
singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of
light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to
contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted
inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than
the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that
a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think
that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius
projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a
Schwarzschild circumference.
Oh, there is a problem, Double-A.

Um ... At the center of the black hole, all the gravitational forces
are pulling one away from the center.

Tempus fugit.

Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
Raving wrote:
Double-A wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
I have posted it takes 6 trillion Suns to create a mass great
enough,and dense enough for the explosion of a black hole and release
its singularity into the cosmos. I relate this great
mass density by theorizing it to 10^80 grams per cubic centimeter.
That's is "1" followed by eighty zeros) Best to keep in mind to compare
this with the density of water which is "1 gram per cubic centimeter.
Having this information makes for good science during the first
trillionth of a second of a big bang Bert


Bert, inside a theoretical black hole, time effectively stands still,
so how can an explosion ever happen there?
Bert and Double-A, I would suppose it means that one would have a heck
of a large singularity!

Think about that for a moment.

My singularity is bigger than your singularity, Bert.

Cordially,

Raving


Raving,

The singularity is theorized to be a very small object at the very
center of a theoretical black hole. The event horizon can be large,
but that is just the spherical boundary at the distance from the
singularity where the escape velocity becomes greater than the speed of
light. This distance called the Schwarzschild radius is interesting to
contemplate in that GR predicts that space would become so contracted
inside a black hole that the actual radius would be much greater than
the circumference divided by 2pi. This is how speculation arises that
a whole other universe could exist inside a black hole. I would think
that the Schwarzschild radius would have to be considered a radius
projected onto flat space. It might be more realistic to talk about a
Schwarzschild circumference.
Oh, there is a problem, Double-A.

Um ... At the center of the black hole, all the gravitational forces
are pulling one away from the center.

Tempus fugit.


Kerr did calculate that the ring singularity was repulsive.

Double-A

Raving A short description of a singularity is "Location where the
fabric of space or spacetime suffers a great rupture. Hard to relate
that to any rupture in our spacetime. Most scientist agree
that a singularity is a point in size That this contraction inside a BH
is a region of infinite matter density,infinite energy.and infinite
temperature.This comes out of GR. Now if you were comparing my
Pee-Air with your Jock that is another story. Lets leave it as two
unknowns. Bert

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Raving A short description of a singularity is "Location where the
fabric of space or spacetime suffers a great rupture. Hard to relate
that to any rupture in our spacetime. Most scientist agree
that a singularity is a point in size That this contraction inside a BH
is a region of infinite matter density,infinite energy.and infinite
temperature.This comes out of GR. Now if you were comparing my
Pee-Air with your Jock that is another story. Lets leave it as two
unknowns. Bert


nightbat

We can't Officer Bert because unlike many modern sci fi hype
book selling scientists we profound Earth Science and Researcher team
members deal in reality. A sci fi black hole is a non real world
possibility while your reported comparative question of mutual Pee-Airs
reality based.

The main difference between major important men of science is that their
profound theories and predictions eventually come true while sci fi
hypers sell many books or movie tickets. The hypers usually wind up
making more quick money then humble scientific ones but all of your
modern improved life is owed to the true great men of deep theoretical
and practical applied science.

continue always in being real and great,
the nightbat

nightbat Far out hypothetical thinking comes first. Best to keep in
mind Einstein told us light curves,and years later he was proven right.
Eddington would not even bothered to look,and how to look if Einstein
did not come up with the thinking first. We never built that Texas big
accelerator,and that means a lot of hypothetical thinking will not be
proven,and yet nightbat we must not stop thinking(coming up with ideas).
Someday it will be human original thoughts that computers will compare
to reality for us Go figure . Staying in to stay warm Will take a
picture of the shuttle in my back yard,but will it fly tonite????? Every
question mark is a 20% no go. This shuttle flying coffin has to be
buryed. Bert

Double-A If there is motion inside a black hole there is time. The
motion takes place from the event horizon to the BH core. Bert