Undocumented Apollo configuration!

See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically
accurate."

- Dean

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically
accurate."

- Dean

That must be a mistake! Someone is playing a joke with photoshop!

Carl

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically accurate."

- Dean

But in space, no-one can hear the LEM's ecstatic moans...

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:48:09 GMT, Cruithne3753
wrote:

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically accurate."

But in space, no-one can hear the LEM's ecstatic moans...


LOL

Dale

Cruithne3753 wrote:
dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically accurate."

- Dean

But in space, no-one can hear the LEM's ecstatic moans...


Which way did the LM's door swing in this version?

;-)


Rusty

"Rusty" wrote in message
ups.com...

Cruithne3753 wrote:
dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically accurate."

- Dean

But in space, no-one can hear the LEM's ecstatic moans...


Which way did the LM's door swing in this version?

Both ways.



;-)


Rusty

On 10 Oct 2006 13:15:23 -0700, "Rusty"
wrote:

Which way did the LM's door swing in this version?

....Since it's taking it up the wazoo, which way do you think? :-P

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

Rusty wrote:
Cruithne3753 wrote:

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:

See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically accurate."

- Dean

But in space, no-one can hear the LEM's ecstatic moans...



Which way did the LM's door swing in this version?


Looks like it's "swingin' both ways" to me. (smirk)

--

..

"Though I could not caution all, I yet may warn a few:
Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools!"

--grateful dead.
__________________________________________________ _____________
Mike Flugennock, flugennock at sinkers dot org
"Mikey'zine": dubya dubya dubya dot sinkers dot org

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically
accurate."

- Dean



Must have been the LM with the "MOL tunnel" option.

;-)


Rusty

dk5213[remove-this] wrote:
See the model of the Apollo command module docked to the LM:

http://kathystoybox.com/pro152109.html

Made from "exact blueprints," described as "historically
accurate."

:-)

You can also get the same configuration he
http://www.aikensairplanes.com/mahogany/zz_apollo.htm

According to this site:
http://aviation-central.com/space/usm90.htm
"The lander was made so that it could be positioned by the command
modules (see above left), but was turned around, feet outward, for
boarding. The lander provided to be far more versatile than expected."

And they call us 'geeks'...