Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


Beeert, Beeeert, Beeert ... all this stuff was explained to you before, time
and again. Yet you go and get hammered on Bud, pass out and then promptly
forget everything you learned that day.

Look at ANY explosion (there should be a zillion clips available, on-line).
You will see that the expanding pressure shell is not linear. The billowing
is caused by pressure differentials in the expanding shell, pretty much like
shortly after the BB. While an Earthly explosion is eventually halted by the
Earth's gravity and the resistance of the surrounding atmosphere, the BB had
no such obstacles. Since the mass distribution was not homogenous, some
parts of the expanding material traveled at a slightly higher clip than the
slightly less dense areas. This set up small eddies between the two. These
eddies then accumulated mass and with mass they developed gravity, which in
turn attracted more mass etc. Since this occurred at all directions and
distances from the original focal point of the BB, the earliest stars were
formed at random distances from each other. They became the original Super
Giants, who exhausted their lives in Supernovae, in a relatively short time,
to become the first black holes. They, in turn, attracted more cosmic
stuff, which then formed the preset day galaxies. All the original galaxies
were of the spiral variety, however, when two of them collided, they merged
into one spherical galaxy.

Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many
times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would
know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could
discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me
"cheers" Bert

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many
times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would
know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could
discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me
"cheers" Bert


Back to the Beeeer, Beeeert. It seems I'm not the only one who disagrees
with your convoluted concoctions. Go ahead, sleep it off and take another
stab at it.

what should stop it from expanding, and "collapse inward on itself" ?

please stop drinking and use common sense instead,
nothing and i mean nothing logical indicates one huge galaxy, instead of
trillions of galaxies

this is my "Bert drinks too much theory" and can be used to answer the
question (why?) every time Bert publish a theory with missing logic

Bert don't take it personal, but now and then you gotta used known facts if
you want to understand things

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse
...
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 35 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.

Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth
of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion
years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories
(yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert

Facts = established knowledge, that is not nessesary the same as 100 % true,
facts can even change

(eg. I have 2 cars, that is fact, but if i get 1 more i have 3 and then my
facts have changed)

no we are NOT talking about actions that took place 22 billion years ago,
it's more like 13 -14 billion years ago

is there trillions of galaxies? you say speculation, theories, I say fact
did the universe break up in BB? you say speculation, theories, I say fact

if logical thinking tells you one big galaxy, then BB wouldn't be possible,
therefor it's not logical thinking

Where have you published your "time lapse theory" ?

And why did you choose to take it personally anyway ? ;-)

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth
of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion
years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories
(yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert
--- Berts first post inserted here

After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 46 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.

Starman The age of the universe of 13.5 billion years is not a fact.
Fact is using the light waves getting longer and redder shows the size
and age of the universe getting older. I predict my 22 billion years
will be shown to be closer to reality in about 35 years. My thinking has
aways been about 35 years ahead. Hope to have a ghost writer help me
write a book on all my theories. Will also reveal my way of taking the
fastest pictures in the world(million times faster than a strobe. will
give out my pulse fusion machine. Show how so many machines can be made
to work better. How the heat of the Sun can keep you cool. How to start
small gas engines without any battery or human energy. I know how every
thing works. I also know the more I think things out,on my own the more
fun in thinking I just wish I had a better education,and knew how to
write better. Reality is if you find some of my first posts(about 8
years ago. You would have great fun with me. However 8 years ago I was
not very touchy. I 'm getting old and grouchy. I blame myself for being
alone,thinking its my fault for not being friendly. Well I do have my
internet friends. Sometimes even Cactus Saul makes me laugh,and when I
laugh I feel good inside. Well its my last brew for today(reached my
limit) Cheers Bert

Your limit is when you become a drunken old fool, BEERTbrain?

Saul Levy


On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 21:34:21 -0400, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Starman The age of the universe of 13.5 billion years is not a fact.
Fact is using the light waves getting longer and redder shows the size
and age of the universe getting older. I predict my 22 billion years
will be shown to be closer to reality in about 35 years. My thinking has
aways been about 35 years ahead. Hope to have a ghost writer help me
write a book on all my theories. Will also reveal my way of taking the
fastest pictures in the world(million times faster than a strobe. will
give out my pulse fusion machine. Show how so many machines can be made
to work better. How the heat of the Sun can keep you cool. How to start
small gas engines without any battery or human energy. I know how every
thing works. I also know the more I think things out,on my own the more
fun in thinking I just wish I had a better education,and knew how to
write better. Reality is if you find some of my first posts(about 8
years ago. You would have great fun with me. However 8 years ago I was
not very touchy. I 'm getting old and grouchy. I blame myself for being
alone,thinking its my fault for not being friendly. Well I do have my
internet friends. Sometimes even Cactus Saul makes me laugh,and when I
laugh I feel good inside. Well its my last brew for today(reached my
limit) Cheers Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


Or you could simply learn some physics. Suggest you look up something
called Jeans length - an object will grow from a density fluctuation
provided that the fluctuation extends over a distance taht exceeds the
Jeans length. This was discovered by James Jeans back in 1902 and is
consistent with the fluctuations seen in the background radiation a la
WMAP and COBE. No need for some (non)theory you think you have found
(of course we can get into the definition of theory from a science
standpoint but then that would simply prove how little you really know).