![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
### quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/
Part-time pulsar yields new insight into inner workings of cosmic clocks Astronomers using the 76-m Lovell radio telescope at the University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Observatory have discovered a very strange pulsar that helps explain how pulsars act as 'cosmic clocks' and confirms theories put forward 37 years ago to explain the way in which pulsars emit their regular beams of radio waves - considered to be one of the hardest problems in astrophysics. Their research, now published in Science Express, reveals a pulsar that is only 'on' for part of the time. The strange pulsar is spinning about its own axis and slows down 50% faster when it is 'on' compared to when it is 'off'. Pulsars are dense, highly magnetized neutron stars that are born in a violent explosion marking the death of massive stars. They act like cosmic lighthouses as they project a rotating beam of radio waves across the galaxy. Dr. Michael Kramer explains, "Pulsars are a physicist's dream come true. They are made of the most extreme matter that we know of in the Universe, and their highly stable rotation makes them super-precise cosmic clocks. But, embarrassingly, we do not know how these clocks work. This discovery goes a long way towards solving this problem." The research team, led by Dr. Michael Kramer, found a pulsar that is only periodically active. It appears as a normal pulsar for about a week and then "switches off" for about one month before emitting pulses again. The pulsar, called PSR B1931+24, is unique in this behaviour and affords astronomers an opportunity to compare its quiet and active phases. As it is quiet the majority of the time, it is difficult to detect, suggesting that there may be many other similar objects that have, so far, escaped detection. Prof. Andrew Lyne points out that, "After the discovery of pulsars, theoreticians proposed that strong electric fields rip particles out of the neutron star surface into a surrounding magnetised cloud of plasma called the magnetosphere. But, for nearly 40 years, there had been no way to test whether our basic understanding was correct." The University of Manchester astronomers were delighted when they found that this pulsar slows down more rapidly when the pulsar is on than when it is off. Dr. Christine Jordan points out the importance of this discovery, "We can clearly see that something hits the brakes when the pulsar is on." This breaking mechanism must be related to the radio emission and the processes creating it and the additional slow-down can be explained by a wind of particles leaving the pulsar's magnetosphere and carrying away rotational energy. "Such a braking effect of the pulsar wind was expected but now, finally, we have observational evidence for it" adds Dr Duncan Lorimer. The amount of braking can be related to the number of charges leaving the pulsar magnetosphere. Dr. Michael Kramer explains their surprise when it was found that the resulting number was within 2% of the theoretical predictions. "We were really shocked when we saw these numbers on our screens. Given the pulsar's complexity, we never really expected the magnetospheric theory to work so well." Prof. Andrew Lyne summarized the result: "It is amazing that, after almost 40 years, we have not only found a new, unusual, pulsar phenomenon but also a very unexpected way to confirm some fundamental theories about the nature of pulsars." ### end quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/ I needed to quote the above so that I can reply line per line to the underlying false methodology and false presumptions of the scientists above in that article. They presume pulsars are "neutron stars" when in fact, most if not every pulsar is a alien civilization machine built to communicate. Sadly, as every new type of pulsar is reported, these poor scientists are stretching physics into science fiction and the outer limits of logic. All that needs to be discovered is that one of these strange pulsars is in a line with another strange pulsar, two pulsars, nearby one another and where one shuts down for a month, the other is signalling to the first. When one changes frequency and waits for the message to be changed in frequency by the second, is proof that these are alien machines. So in the next post I will counter line for line the presumptions in the above. It is a shame and pity, that if the scientists in the above spent as much time in figuring out how to build a machine that we can "pulse" our neighbors in the cosmic skies with radio waves, that we would be closer to an explanation of pulsars than this convoluted logic in the above report. Granted, humanity is only able to build a primitive pulsar at first because, well, we are not so advanced as intelligent life, for we are the young dummies in our cosmic corner of the skies. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() a_plutonium wrote: ### quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/ Part-time pulsar yields new insight into inner workings of cosmic clocks Astronomers using the 76-m Lovell radio telescope at the University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Observatory have discovered a very strange pulsar that helps explain how pulsars act as 'cosmic clocks' and confirms theories put forward 37 years ago to explain the way in which pulsars emit their regular beams of radio waves - considered to be one of the hardest problems in astrophysics. Their research, now published It is only hard because they never looked at other possibilities. They only presumed these were "neutron stars". When pulsars were first discovered they were called LGMs standing for "little green men". It is a shame that physicists have a pitiful one track mind when they consider pulsars as "neutron stars". And they will bend physics to suit themselves rather than simplify everything when they posit that a pulsar is alien communication. in Science Express, reveals a pulsar that is only 'on' for part of the time. The strange pulsar is spinning about its own axis and slows down 50% faster when it is 'on' compared to when it is 'off'. To understand this best, would require an engineer rather than theoretical physicists working on a false assumption. To get the best engineers together to build a "pulsar machine". In the colloboration of building such a machine, it will come to light that the machine slows down more rapidly when in the on position due to engineering. Pulsars are dense, highly magnetized neutron stars that are born in a violent explosion marking the death of massive stars. They act like cosmic lighthouses as they project a rotating beam of radio waves across the galaxy. Dr. Michael Kramer explains, "Pulsars are a physicist's dream come true. They are made of the most extreme matter that we know of in the Universe, and their highly stable rotation makes them super-precise cosmic clocks. But, embarrassingly, we do not know how these clocks work. This discovery goes a long way towards solving this problem." The big trouble of 20th century physics is that although Bohr and the Quantum Physicists won every challenge against Einstein and his pathetic GR, that the main body of physicists in the 20th century did the irrational thing of following Einstein and his pathetic GR. Even though QM won over GR and everything that Einstein did in astronomy. Yet the physicists worshipped Einstein and GR when they should have followed Bohr and QM. If they had followed Bohr and QM, then we would not have papers and journals filled with the hogwash of neutron star, black-holes, string theory and other assorted nonsense. If the physicists of the 20th century had had better commonsense and better logical reasoning they would have stuck with QM and Bohr and followed Dirac and Bell. They would have known that "neutron stars" violate QM and the Pauli Exclusion Principle and that stars never crunch into a neutron state of matter. They would have looked for a different explanation for Pulsars. And the first explanation when discovered in 1967 is often usually the correct explanation. They thought they were "little green men" and called them LGM. The research team, led by Dr. Michael Kramer, found a pulsar that is only periodically active. It appears as a normal pulsar for about a week and then "switches off" for about one month before emitting pulses again. The pulsar, called PSR B1931+24, is unique in this behaviour and I speculate that if Mike Kramer could survey the cosmic skies around B1931+24, that he will find a nearby neighbor who is beaming a radio pulsed signal to that of B1931. In other words, two different star systems are communicating to each other. One is saying information for which it is prompting B1931 to shut down and then rebroadcast later. Because of the engineering of a pulsar machine by these aliens, that it takes this time lag for slowing down as compared to starting up. affords astronomers an opportunity to compare its quiet and active phases. As it is quiet the majority of the time, it is difficult to detect, suggesting that there may be many other similar objects that have, so far, escaped detection. I would differ on that point when we consider all pulsars as alien machines. In this viewpoint, we probably have all the pulsars accounted for in our corner of the cosmic skies. I still need a graphic of every pulsar known and how far apart they are from one another. It gives us a uniform density of life on other planets. Prof. Andrew Lyne points out that, "After the discovery of pulsars, theoreticians proposed that strong electric fields rip particles out of the neutron star surface into a surrounding magnetised cloud of plasma called the magnetosphere. But, for nearly 40 years, there had been no way to test whether our basic understanding was correct." No, the trouble with Andrew Lyne is that when you are under a false assumption of what pulsars are in the first place, that every time a different pulsar is found, then more and more beyond the pale explanations have to be rigged and hornswaggled to try to fit the new pulsar in with the old pulsars. On the other hand, when you start with the assumption that pulsars are alien communication, then the reverse logic comes into play where every new and "Strange pulsar" adds support and adds credence to the hypothesis that it is alien life. The stranger pulsars become and the more difficult to explain adds that much more credence to the assumption of alien communication. The University of Manchester astronomers were delighted when they found that this pulsar slows down more rapidly when the pulsar is on than when it is off. Dr. Christine Jordan points out the importance of this discovery, "We can clearly see that something hits the brakes when the pulsar is on." Under Christine's bad assumption that pulsars are "neutron stars" then Jordan will have to come up with some horrible and hairy nonliving physical explanation that defies much of modern physics. But if Jordan, on the other hand, simply assumed that B1931 was in a state of communication with a neighboring pulsar which it required B1931 to shut down the machine and change the frequency. Well, it all becomes so easy to explain and to understand. This breaking mechanism must be related to the radio emission and the processes creating it and the additional slow-down can be explained by a wind of particles leaving the pulsar's magnetosphere and carrying away rotational energy. "Such a braking effect of the pulsar wind was expected but now, finally, we have observational evidence for it" adds Dr Duncan Lorimer. It is a shame that modern scientists such as Duncan Lorimer dive into complex physics when they should more often lift themselves up and ask a few logical questions. Why make things complex? Am I missing something that would make this entire issue so very down to Earth and simple? Have I learned Occam's Razor rather than spend so much time on learning details? What would take Duncan a hundred pages of physics and math to explain B1931 strange behavior. Yet take only one paragraph to explain as alien's communicating with other aliens via a pulsing machine. The amount of braking can be related to the number of charges leaving the pulsar magnetosphere. Dr. Michael Kramer explains their surprise when it was found that the resulting number was within 2% of the theoretical predictions. "We were really shocked when we saw these numbers on our screens. Given the pulsar's complexity, we never really expected the magnetospheric theory to work so well." Mike Kramer is deluding himself and readers. In the past 40 years of pulsar history, these objects are not becoming more understandable but rather more complex. And the reason being is that we are under a false assumption that they are "neutron stars". When you dismiss neutron stars, then these objects become easier under the hypothesis of alien communication. Prof. Andrew Lyne summarized the result: "It is amazing that, after almost 40 years, we have not only found a new, unusual, pulsar phenomenon but also a very unexpected way to confirm some fundamental theories about the nature of pulsars." ### end quoting http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/news/brakingpulsar/ Andrew Lyne would spend better time in looking for 2 pulsars nearby to one another. Where one shuts down while the other is pulsing. While one changes its frequency and a time delay the second changes its frequency. The time delay is the amount of time required for the pulse to travel between the aliens. If Andrew found such a circumstance, he would have found the first proof of advanced alien life, other than humanity. And Andrew would then have put pulsars on a true track rather than its current false track of neutron stars. What we need is the report of two pulsars linked together in their pulsing. Where one shuts down and changes frequency corresponding to the other shutting down and changing frequency. Trouble is of the distance separating pulsars is usually more than 10 light years. And with the few number of total pulsars, our chances of spotting pulsar linked communication is not going to be easy. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a_plutonium wrote:
(all else snipped except) What we need is the report of two pulsars linked together in their pulsing. Where one shuts down and changes frequency corresponding to the other shutting down and changing frequency. Trouble is of the distance separating pulsars is usually more than 10 light years. And with the few number of total pulsars, our chances of spotting pulsar linked communication is not going to be easy. Too bad the astronomers have not compiled a 3-d graphic to locate all the known pulsars and the distance between them. So that we can sort of see the geometry of pulsars relative to Earth. I would speculate that the pulsars form a sort of symmetrical sphere around Earth as center. I believe this to be the case because to me all pulsars are advanced aliens and the probability of life in other solar-systems would be spaced evenly forming a sphere. And I would like to find out what pulsars are aimed at other pulsars with Earth in-between those 2 pulsars. So is there a pulsar that is diametrically opposite B1931 with Earth in-between? Now I did some checking as to the distance of pulsars and they run in the thousands of light-years where B1931 is 2,000 light-years from Earth and B1257 is 1,000 light-years from Earth. And our closest star system is Alpha Centauri of about 4.4 light years. The closest pulsar to Earth is called Geminga of 500 light-years. So, now, if we have our best engineers build us a pulsar machine. A machine that imitates or mimics pulsars of their radio waves and pulsed Alpha Centauri system which would take approx 5 years for them to receive our pulse and another 5 years for us to receive a return message if one is forthcoming. So in all, we pulse Alpha Centauri and wait 10 years. Now if a pulsar machine is not too expensive, I would consider such a project highly valuable, and because 10 years is not all that long of a time to wait. What I suspect is that we will receive a reply from Alpha Centauri system and that there is intelligent life on one or more planets in the Alpha Centauri system. I would have the Pulsar Machine pulse out the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And if there is no life on Alpha Centauri System then some alien life
beyond Alpha Centauri will probably intercept our pulsing and reply back to us. But another benefit to this Pulsar Machine is the broad awareness of the physics community of how feeble it is to think that pulsars are some exotica star of a neutron star. When humanity itself can fully imitate a pulsar, then why believe that pulsars are anything other than alien civilizations. Instead of 1,000 hair twirling physicists in ivory towers trying to assemble the next incoming data of a strange pulsar into a hornswaggling explanation. When it is far better to just run downstairs from the ivory tower and meet the engineers who put together a simple machine that Pulses just like a pulsar. And we instantly realize and recognize that all those pulsars out there were just simply machines built by advanced aliens. The history of pulsars reminds me alot of the history of the Aztecs who believed the Spaniards were "gods" since they had "fire sticks" (guns) and since they had horses. Likewise the physicists coming out of the 20th century under the delusion of General Relativity come to believe that pulsars are some neutron stars, when simply they are just alien pulsing machines. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() a_plutonium wrote: The University of Manchester astronomers were delighted when they found that this pulsar slows down more rapidly when the pulsar is on than when it is off. Dr. Christine Jordan points out the importance of this discovery, "We can clearly see that something hits the brakes when the pulsar is on." Not really. For if we engineer our own pulsar. We get together a number of excellent engineers to build ourselves a Pulsar Machine here on Earth with the intent to pulse Alpha Centauri system in hopes of the intelligent life on Alpha Centauri system will respond in like manner after waiting 10 years. That a PULSAR MACHINE is like a fan blade in front to radio wave pulses. And a fan blade slows down very prolonged but starts up immediately. So the expression of B1931 is merely the engineering fact that a fan blade like contraption is in front of the PULSAR. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well the title kind of says it all.
It is a physics fact that every TV broadcast floats into space and is there to eternity. So the old "Outer Limits" shows are present in space. The trouble is that the signal is so attenuated that it is no longer recoverable. So in theory it is there but in practice it is not recoverable. So if there is life on Alpha Centauri, they will not be able to recover Earth's old "Outer Limits" radio waves. So the question is, how strong of radio waves do we need to pulse to Alpha Centauri that it is easy for Centaurians to recover? Will we need the power of a river's hydroelectric energy to build a Pulsar Machine? If so, then I believe this is a small price to pay for contacting intelligent life beyond our solar system. So that the hydroelectric power of a small river in the USA provides sufficient energy to keep a Pulsing Pulsar beamed to Alpha Centauri system. Most people would guess that there will not be a response from Alpha Centauri after 10 or even 15 and 20 years waiting. I on the other hand am optimistic, and that I suspect once we beam Alpha Centauri that they will build a Pulsar Machine and beam us back in about 15 years. And 15 years may seem like a long time, but the reward of knowing another alien civilization on par to our own is very much what life is all about. Considering that most pulsars observed are thousands of light years away, that those pulsars are probably alien civilizations that are millions of years more advanced than we are. And that they are near the end of depleting their uranium fuel in their solar system and are due for extinction. So their pulsar beeping is their final gravemarker. And what a beautiful way of proving the Fusion Barrier Principle. In that no ITER will ever work. No fusion machine will ever work. And that all life is confined to their solar system and once they deplete all sources of uranium and thorium, they build a Pulsar Machine to cry out to the rest of the cosmos their presence. How much hydroelectric power would we need to build a Pulsar that can beep a distance of 1,000 light years as noted by pulsar B1257? Could a nuclear power station beep out pulses that match B1257? Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apparently from reading a website that there were about 20 different
theories to explain pulsars when first discovered in 1967 and one of the main ones was alien theory. So I am not alone. Obviously it was the neutron-star theory that won out. But I think the neutron star theory is going to quickly fall into the trash heap of fake theories. And the neutron star theory could be the biggest laughable gaffe of the past 40 years in physics. Laughable because if humanity can build a machine that imitates any one of the observed pulsars to date, would strongly indicate that pulsars are all alien machines and not some physical star phenomenon. Analogy: all the scientists laughed whenever anyone suggested the pyramids of Egypt were built by aliens and rightfully they should laugh. Because Occam's Razor tells us that since humans can build such pyramids, then the pyramids were indeed built by humans. Now, let us run that logic over pulsars. If humanity can build a machine that perfectly imitates all the pulsars seen to date, and that to power such a machine may require a large hydroelectric dam of all of its electricity. Well, that is costly but, if such a machine is do-able, suggests that all pulsars are alien creations and that not a single pulsar is a raw physical star. Physicists laughed at suggestions the Pyramids were built by aliens, but in turn now, we should laugh at all those neutron star physicists who for the past 40 years twirled and split their hairs over neutron-stars and never for a moment thought "hey, I can easily build a machine that perfectly imitates a pulsar and run and operate it from a hydroelectric station on the Missouri river. So this pulsar episode in physics history could easily turn out to be one of the most laughable gaffes in the history of physics. But there is also the laughable gaffes of black-holes and string theory. So we have alot of bad physics to laugh over for the past 50 years. Now I wonder if the distance to these pulsars were calculated by the pulsed signal itself or whether the distance was calculated independent of the pulse signal. The reason I ask is because I suspect that all these pulsars are really much closer to Earth than the current data blairs out. I suspect we have false measures of their distances from Earth and that they are very much closer to Earth. So I wonder if anyone has measured the distance to a pulsar ignoring the pulse. And I suspect the reason for the pulsed signal is that a pulse is more power economical to a alien civilization rather than a pure beam. If pulsars were really stars and neutron-stars, then the challenging question would immediately be why not a neutron star spit out a laser beam or a x-ray beam instead of a pulsed signal. Some would retort that the pulse is because of the star rotation, but then the rotation would have nothing to do with the beam at the poles. The fact that no star has ever had a solid beam instead of a pulsed beam suggests big holes in the neutron-star theory. Aliens would pulse the beam because it takes so much less energy. In the website I read tonight says that Carl Sagan had some words of advice about pulsars as well as LaViolette on aliens. But neither one of these gentlemen had the Atom Totality theory plus the Fusion Barrier Principle to guide their thoughts on pulsars. It is the Fusion Barrier Principle that would completely guide the vision as to why build pulsar machines by aliens. Because no intelligent life can go beyond their solar system and survive the trip, and that all life is trapped inside their solar system, and so their desire to communicate with what is beyond their solar system is a big desire met with that of a pulsar machine. The icing on the cake will be when we finish building a Pulsar Machine and pulse the Alpha Centauri system and wait for 15 years and receive a reply back from Centaurians will be the proof that pulsars are all alien communication systems. P.S. my email box works only for those on my Contact List. Make a post saying you want to be on that Contact List if you want to email me about science. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() a_plutonium wrote: (snipped) In the website I read tonight says that Carl Sagan had some words of advice about pulsars as well as LaViolette on aliens. But neither one of these gentlemen had the Atom Totality theory plus the Fusion Barrier Principle to guide their thoughts on pulsars. It is the Fusion Barrier Principle that would completely guide the vision as to why build pulsar machines by aliens. Because no intelligent life can go beyond their solar system and survive the trip, and that all life is trapped inside their solar system, and so their desire to communicate with what is beyond their solar system is a big desire met with that of a pulsar machine. The icing on the cake will be when we finish building a Pulsar Machine and pulse the Alpha Centauri system and wait for 15 years and receive a reply back from Centaurians will be the proof that pulsars are all alien communication systems. P.S. my email box works only for those on my Contact List. Make a post saying you want to be on that Contact List if you want to email me about science. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I did not catch the rich flavor of the irony in the above. The irony of building pulsar machines to communicate with other aliens, yet here on Earth I want the opposite for my email box in that I do not want all those wasteful signals (spam). Can I draw any analogy between spam in email boxes and pulsar signals by aliens. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So what happened to this lens grinding machine?? | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | March 11th 04 05:45 PM |