![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0607/14bigelow/
Details status and explains why Genesis controllers have so far only gotten a handful of small images. (Not to leave you in suspense, they're still trying to establish an S-band communications link.) Best, - Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And here's another, at Cosmic Log, also with details I haven't seen
elsewhe http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/07/13/1086.aspx It's great to see Robert Bigelow making himself available and actually talking to reporters about his plan. It wasn't exactly a secret before, but clearly something has changed in their PR strategy, and Bigelow himself is now actively trying to stir up public interest. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And here's another, at Cosmic Log, also with details I haven't seen
elsewhe http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/07/13/1086.aspx He's really serious about the US thing, eh? (As also seen in the America's Space Prize rules). He's building antennas in Hawaii and Alaska (compare with NASA who has their biggest non-CONUS antennas in Australia and Spain). What's next? Guam and Samoa? (Not that it's a bad thing; I can think of any number of reasons why he'd want to do this...) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Kingdon wrote: And here's another, at Cosmic Log, also with details I haven't seen elsewhe http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/07/13/1086.aspx He's really serious about the US thing, eh? (As also seen in the America's Space Prize rules). He's building antennas in Hawaii and Alaska (compare with NASA who has their biggest non-CONUS antennas in Australia and Spain). What's next? Guam and Samoa? (Not that it's a bad thing; I can think of any number of reasons why he'd want to do this...) Off the top of my head, I can imagine that as a U.S. company, his legal expenses go down pretty dramatically if he keeps it all within the U.S. Or maybe he just believes in supporting the American economy as much as he reasonably can -- but he'll (quite reasonably) go to Russia for a launch if there are no viable American alternatives. Best, - Joe |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Kingdon wrote: He's really serious about the US thing, eh? (As also seen in the America's Space Prize rules)... My understanding is that he's looked at the ITAR rules, and understandably decided that he wants no part of that nightmare. If that disqualifies otherwise-interesting foreign suppliers, that's too bad. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer wrote:
In article , Jim Kingdon wrote: He's really serious about the US thing, eh? (As also seen in the America's Space Prize rules)... My understanding is that he's looked at the ITAR rules, and understandably decided that he wants no part of that nightmare. If that disqualifies otherwise-interesting foreign suppliers, that's too bad. Only those of them who need to put their hands on BA hardware, which includes Kosmotras. Otherwise it works well, he bought a life support system from a German company for $1,3 million, instead of buying it in US for around $100 million. Regards, NE http://www.lasvegasmercury.com/2004/.../24250261.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer wrote:
My understanding is that he's looked at the ITAR rules, and understandably decided that he wants no part of that nightmare. If that disqualifies otherwise-interesting foreign suppliers, that's too bad. In a recent interview, he complained bitterly about the hoops he had to jump through just to launch Genesis I on a foreign launcher. see http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/07/13/1086.aspx |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Strout" wrote in message ... http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0607/14bigelow/ Details status and explains why Genesis controllers have so far only gotten a handful of small images. (Not to leave you in suspense, they're still trying to establish an S-band communications link.) From the following article, it sounds more like they've currently only have one ground station in operation, so that's limiting bandwidth. That and much of the initial data coming down is telemetry type data, not pictures. As time goes on, it seems like they'll be using more bandwidth for pictures and less for telemetry. That and they hope to build more ground stations. http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archi...7/13/1086.aspx Jeff -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:11:23 -0400, Jeff Findley wrote:
"Joe Strout" wrote in message ... http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0607/14bigelow/ Details status and explains why Genesis controllers have so far only gotten a handful of small images. (Not to leave you in suspense, they're still trying to establish an S-band communications link.) From the following article, it sounds more like they've currently only have one ground station in operation, so that's limiting bandwidth. That and much of the initial data coming down is telemetry type data, not pictures. As time goes on, it seems like they'll be using more bandwidth for pictures and less for telemetry. That and they hope to build more ground stations. http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archi...7/13/1086.aspx Sometimes going to the source is best. http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/mult...s_to_stars.php begin qoute Las Vegas, We Have a Problem Just as the anticipated time of SpaceQuest's contact with the Genesis I was approaching, a major storm caused power outages in much of the Arlington area. SpaceQuest, which was to receive the first communication from Genesis I and relay it to Las Vegas, had no power. Now, there was a little more than 30 minutes before SpaceQuest controllers were supposed to hear a cry of life from the Genesis I, but there was no life in the receivers in Virginia. SpaceQuest engineers were in a bind. They had 30 minutes to find a way to get power and receive first contact from the Genesis I. As SpaceQuest engineers scrambled for a solution, one noticed that there was light in a restaurant across the street, which still miraculously had power. Desperate for power, they got all the extension cords they could find and went across the street to ask for help. The restaurant owner agreed to help and SpaceQuest had power. "They ran the cords across the road to get power from the restaurant," Bigelow said. "Cars were driving across the cord as it powered their computers and receivers." Even after power was restored, there was another major obstacle to overcome: the automatic system that allowed the antenna to automatically move into position to listen to the spacecraft was not functioning properly due to the power outage. Time was running out, and SpaceQuest engineers now would have to manually steer the antenna themselves to receive the signal. end quote http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/ -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Genesis Crash - Problem uncovered in '01??? | Ted A. Nichols II | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 8th 04 10:30 PM |
NASA to capture fiery Genesis re-entry with 'eyes in the sky' (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 5th 04 07:02 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Ned Wright's TBBNH Page (C) | Bjoern Feuerbacher | Astronomy Misc | 24 | October 2nd 03 06:50 PM |
Good Article by Allan Shapiro about RCC and Leading Edge Failure | cndc | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 07:00 PM |