![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to a local old sea dog, there is a 50 year cycle to the height of
tides superimposed on the usual new/full moon / sun distance, cyclic variation. If there is indeed such an influence , would any one know what it is - earth's precession ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not the earth's precession, that has a cycle of about 26000 years. (I
think) Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com "n cook" wrote in message ... According to a local old sea dog, there is a 50 year cycle to the height of tides superimposed on the usual new/full moon / sun distance, cyclic variation. If there is indeed such an influence , would any one know what it is - earth's precession ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello
This has prompted a question I have not worked out the answer but is probably a very easy one and everybody else probably knows the answer. If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one regards Paul "n cook" wrote in message ... According to a local old sea dog, there is a 50 year cycle to the height of tides superimposed on the usual new/full moon / sun distance, cyclic variation. If there is indeed such an influence , would any one know what it is - earth's precession ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
p forsdick wrote in message
. uk... Hello This has prompted a question I have not worked out the answer but is probably a very easy one and everybody else probably knows the answer. If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one regards Paul "n cook" wrote in message ... According to a local old sea dog, there is a 50 year cycle to the height of tides superimposed on the usual new/full moon / sun distance, cyclic variation. If there is indeed such an influence , would any one know what it is - earth's precession ? Tidal effects not travelling at 1000 mph (1000 times 24 = earth circumference) is probably something to do with that effect |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "p forsdick" wrote in message . uk... Hello This has prompted a question I have not worked out the answer but is probably a very easy one and everybody else probably knows the answer. If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one regards Paul It is wrong to think of the tides as being caused by the Moon 'pulling'. The key is that the whole 'Earth-Moon' system, is orbiting around their common mass centre (actually inside the Earth). In it's simplest form, the bit of the Earth closest to the Moon, gets pulled more, and bulges upwards towards the Moon, but at the same time, the part furthest away, gets pulled less, and with the centripetal effect, bulges up in the opposite direction. Worse, the actual 'tides', lag the pull, and can get accelerated/decelerated by the local geography, so (for example), there are places that actually get four tides (or more!) a day, as the water takes different routes round the local land masses. Best Wishes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Hamlett" wrote in message
... "p forsdick" wrote in message . uk... Hello This has prompted a question I have not worked out the answer but is probably a very easy one and everybody else probably knows the answer. If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one regards Paul It is wrong to think of the tides as being caused by the Moon 'pulling'. The key is that the whole 'Earth-Moon' system, is orbiting around their common mass centre (actually inside the Earth). In it's simplest form, the bit of the Earth closest to the Moon, gets pulled more, and bulges upwards towards the Moon, but at the same time, the part furthest away, gets pulled less, and with the centripetal effect, bulges up in the opposite direction. Worse, the actual 'tides', lag the pull, and can get accelerated/decelerated by the local geography, so (for example), there are places that actually get four tides (or more!) a day, as the water takes different routes round the local land masses. Best Wishes Damn it! The first message i actually had an accurate answer to and someone beat me to it ): |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Geake" wrote in message ... "Roger Hamlett" wrote in message ... "p forsdick" wrote in message . uk... Hello This has prompted a question I have not worked out the answer but is probably a very easy one and everybody else probably knows the answer. If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one regards Paul It is wrong to think of the tides as being caused by the Moon 'pulling'. The key is that the whole 'Earth-Moon' system, is orbiting around their common mass centre (actually inside the Earth). In it's simplest form, the bit of the Earth closest to the Moon, gets pulled more, and bulges upwards towards the Moon, but at the same time, the part furthest away, gets pulled less, and with the centripetal effect, bulges up in the opposite direction. Worse, the actual 'tides', lag the pull, and can get accelerated/decelerated by the local geography, so (for example), there are places that actually get four tides (or more!) a day, as the water takes different routes round the local land masses. Best Wishes Damn it! The first message i actually had an accurate answer to and someone beat me to it ): Your reference, was much more complete though. :-) Best Wishes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger Hamlett wrote: It is wrong to think of the tides as being caused by the Moon 'pulling'. The key is that the whole 'Earth-Moon' system, is orbiting around their common mass centre (actually inside the Earth). In it's simplest form, the bit of the Earth closest to the Moon, gets pulled more, and bulges upwards towards the Moon, but at the same time, the part furthest away, gets pulled less, and with the centripetal effect, bulges up in the opposite direction. Worse, the actual 'tides', lag the pull, and can get accelerated/decelerated by the local geography, so (for example), there are places that actually get four tides (or more!) a day, as the water takes different routes round the local land masses. Where can I see a page or two on this non Newtonian physics that shows how a mass 1/4 of a million miles away can have more effect on tiny particulates than a mass 81 times greater and no distance at all? Got a link? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
p forsdick wrote:
If the moon goes round the earth once about 25 hours and is the main effect on the tides why do we get 2 high tides in 25 hours and not one http://astunit.com/tutorials/tides.htm Best, Stephen Remove footfrommouth to reply -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Stephen Tonkin | ATM Resources; Astro-Tutorials; Astro Books + + (N51.162 E0.995) | http://astunit.com + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"n cook" wrote in message
... According to a local old sea dog, there is a 50 year cycle to the height of tides superimposed on the usual new/full moon / sun distance, cyclic variation. If there is indeed such an influence , would any one know what it is - earth's precession ? A good reference:: http://home.hiwaay.net/~krcool/Astro/moon/moontides/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Article on Tides | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | June 24th 06 12:00 AM |
Tides | Starlord | Misc | 0 | June 21st 06 06:05 PM |
Satellite capture first-ever gravity map of tides under antarcticice (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | December 6th 05 04:11 PM |
Strong Earth Tides Can Trigger Earthquakes, UCLA Scientists Report(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 21st 04 09:56 PM |
Quasar variation - no time-dilation found by Mike Hawkins | Robin Whittle | Research | 4 | August 14th 04 08:31 PM |