![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will admit to being a little confused after reading the alt.astronomy
FAQ, and note that Google groups simply lists sci.astronomy as "an archive" to which I can not pose questions. I have what I think is a simple question. In the July 2006 issue of Sky & Telescope, there's an article about how many galaxies are at one (or more) point(s) in their careers quasars. This is because they have large black holes at their centers, which accrete large volumes of gas, stars, and even other galaxies. However, in this process, they are described as expelling "jets" of gas, some of which are accelerated close to "the speed of light." My understanding of black holes is that of a lay person, rather than mathematical. This seems to contradict the notion of a black hole. One quote from the article is that as gas approaches the black hole, it releases energy, which is flung away from the black hole. I'm not sure how this is possible. After gas (or indeed matter in general) has begun its "fall" into the black hole, I thought it was inevitable that it would wind up there? If I've posted here in error, I apologize. Alex |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message ups.com...
I will admit to being a little confused after reading the alt.astronomy FAQ, and note that Google groups simply lists sci.astronomy as "an archive" to which I can not pose questions. I have what I think is a simple question. In the July 2006 issue of Sky & Telescope, there's an article about how many galaxies are at one (or more) point(s) in their careers quasars. This is because they have large black holes at their centers, which accrete large volumes of gas, stars, and even other galaxies. However, in this process, they are described as expelling "jets" of gas, some of which are accelerated close to "the speed of light." My understanding of black holes is that of a lay person, rather than mathematical. This seems to contradict the notion of a black hole. One quote from the article is that as gas approaches the black hole, it releases energy, which is flung away from the black hole. I'm not sure how this is possible. After gas (or indeed matter in general) has begun its "fall" into the black hole, I thought it was inevitable that it would wind up there? If I've posted here in error, I apologize. The material comprising the jets was never below the event horizon of the black hole, it is material that is forced away from the accretion disk and "squirted out" along the polar axes. There's probably some very nifty magnetohydrodynamical processes involved in entraining the material to migrate from the equator to the poles and collimating it into jets. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jun 2006 03:25:05 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:
wrote: I will admit to being a little confused after reading the alt.astronomy FAQ, The alt.astronomy FAQ is a FAKE. It should have Qs such as: Is there only one Uranus? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the FAQ was dead on! Has it changed lately?
Saul Levy On 12 Jun 2006 03:25:05 -0700, "Double-A" wrote: wrote: I will admit to being a little confused after reading the alt.astronomy FAQ, The alt.astronomy FAQ is a FAKE. Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's Chandra Finds Black Holes Are 'Green' | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 4 | April 26th 06 04:34 AM |
Proto supermassive binary black hole detected in X-rays (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 11th 06 09:18 PM |
Proto supermassive binary black hole detected in X-rays (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | April 11th 06 08:09 PM |
Spinning black hole leaves dent in space-time (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 10th 06 05:45 AM |
The universe is expending. | sooncf | SETI | 24 | November 5th 03 03:24 PM |