![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts wrote: kolt wrote:
Matter is described as some physical substance that has mass and occupies space. -=- In some contexts, such as QED and the standard model, photons are quite different from matter, because they are different fundamental particles. The primary difference is that photons are Bosons and anything we would call "matter" includes at least some Fermions. -=- and the -=- radiation they represent are quite distinct from matter. In another context, GR, photons are not used and the electromagnetic fields and radiation they represent are often lumped together with everything that has a nonzero energy-momentum tensor and called "matter" (as distinct from "vacuum", which has a zero energy-momentum tensor) -- note this is really a pun on that word. -=- -- one does need a scorecard (obtained via study). -=- We cannot describe _anything_ without a theory, and that will have to do until and unless we discover/construct a new and better theory describing them. Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts $$ "OTHERwise in-vacu" error-bars. $$ RELATiViSTiC mass m (ABSORBED ..as measured), is scalar = E/c^2. $$ RELATiViSTiC mass has MOST to do with "in vacu" Ambient RESiDUE. $$ RELATiViSTiC gamma = Sqrt(1 - 1/Ambiance^2) "OTHERwise in-vacu". $$ $$ Say WHAT about GR SPACE co-ordinate SYSTEMs of a POiNT on a line: $$ The co-ordinate systen isN'T the GEOMETRY, the GR POiNT is ..duh. $$ The only PRiOR geometry GR had (..for a POiNT at the end of it's $$ GR-WORLD-line) was CUT OFF, having DECLARED "No PRiOR geometry". $$ [Gamma = Sqrt{1-(Amu's/(Residual Ambience COUNT in "vacu")^2}]. [There's No mass, No matter and No momentum, in GEOMETRY, duh]. POiNT is, the co-ordinate system isN'T GR GEOMETRY, a POiNT is. A GR POiNT-surface is so BiG ..it's locally FLAT at-a-DiSTANCE. FAQ - (the heretic's version). $$ You are "OFF-the-WALL (cracked)" if you disagree with THiS note. | If the object is *at rest* in your frame: E = m*c^2. $$ If the object is *at rest* in your frame: m = E/c^2. $$ ALL Non-GR is reverted BACK to a GENERAL-REST-"mass" definition. $$ [Any QUANTiTY that CAN be expressed in SI "kilograms" = "mass"]. ANY flux formula. Message-ID: . SI kilogram="mass" matter definition. $$ You're a VERY cracked-pot.```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New analysis puts dark matter back into elliptical galaxies (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 30 | November 2nd 05 07:50 PM |
[sci.astro] Galaxies (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (8/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:37 AM |
R*volume*raduis2 c3po "Theroy of everything" | zetasum | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 18th 05 09:43 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 11:11 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Station | 0 | February 4th 05 11:10 PM |