UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once.

$$ ^.
$$ My isRAELis.
$$ THAT IAM before I was.
$$ What ABSOLUTE is SiMULTANEiTY is.
$$ ABSOLUTE SiMULTANEiTY is simply REAL TiME.
$$ [ABSOLUTE simultaneity is OBSERVABLE but NOT QUANTiFiABLE].
$$ Several GR observers (Max Born would specify his LiTTLE iMPs),
$$ are simultaneously OBSERViNG a train, speeding along the track
$$ from a MARK on the track at POiNT A. THEN, a GR observer fires
$$ off a SiGNAL which is recieved by a TRANSciever located on the
$$ BACK of the train, which NOW iMMEDiATELY re-LAYs the SiGNAL to
$$ another TRANSciever, located conveniently, at the FRONT of the
$$ train, which iMMEDiATELY FiREs a powerful ELECTRiC-arc MARKiNG
$$ the track at POiNT B. Assuming that VELOCiTY and LENGTH of the
$$ train REMAiN UNchanged ..SHOW (exhibit) the length A-B, each.
$$
$$ Next, REPEAT, by SiMiLARLY triggering an olive and cannon-ball
$$ to iNSTANTLY, AUTOMATiCALLY start to SiMULTANEOUSLY fall, from
$$ from the TOP of the LEANiNG TOWER of PiZA, TOGETHER ..at once.
$$
$$ These are OBSERVERs OBSERViNG iMMEASURABLE SiMULTANEOUSNESS.!!
$$ [snicker] ```Brian.

Tom Roberts wrote: Doune wrote: Tom Wrote:
The only observable definition of "time" that anyone has come up
with is: Time is what clocks measure. This, of course, requires an
operational definition of "clock".

That's not quite true, we did have a concept of time before the
invention of clocks. It's simply the succession of events - mankind
must have had a notional concept of the second law of thermodynamics,
and therefore the arrow of time, long before he could write.

This is not observable, except inside your own head. Solipsism is not
science.

But I see I should have said: observable and quantifiable.

Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts
Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality).
UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once.