![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! I want a general purpose scope where I can see the rings of saturns, nebulae and what have you. I have been recommended a meade etx 125 but that is by the guy in the shop. I was just wondering whay your thoughts are? tia mark |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:47:32 -0000, "mark"
wrote: Hi all, I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! I want a general purpose scope where I can see the rings of saturns, nebulae and what have you. I have been recommended a meade etx 125 but that is by the guy in the shop. I was just wondering whay your thoughts are? tia mark personaly id say it would be ok for plantery work but being 125mm id say its to small for any decent views of deep space objects like nebula etc im sure one of the others here will be along to help you more im still learning all this myself ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mark" wrote in message ... Hi all, I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! I want a general purpose scope where I can see the rings of saturns, nebulae and what have you. I have been recommended a meade etx 125 but that is by the guy in the shop. I was just wondering whay your thoughts are? Start by looking at the 'telescope buyers FAQ': http://home.inreach.com/starlord/ Now while a rather boring text document, it does cover most of the aspects that need to be considered, and there are several other similar FAQ's around. On telescopes, a lot will depend on your circumstances, and site. The ETX, is a fine 'small' scope. As such, you may be more inclined to get it out than something larger. There are two common 'rules of thumb' that apply to scopes: 1) Bigger is better. You will see a lot more through a larger aperture scope. 2) Better a small scope that is used, than a large one that gets left indoors. Generally, 5", is on the bottom end of the aperture range to see many deep space objects. However it is a very easy to use scope. Several of the people here with larger scopes, will have something like this as a 'mobile' scope, since it is a fairly 'grab and go' unit. I have a C5 (the same aperture Celestron unit), for exactly this reason. With 'automated' scopes, you are paying a lot for the automation, and as such, less money is going into the actual optics. So you can buy a non automated 5" scope, for a lot less money, or even something quite a lot larger, for the same sort of price. However having said that 'downside' of the automation, for a user with reasonable levels of light pollution (which can make finding objects a lot harder), the automation can be a real boon. Now the big 'plus' of such a small scope, is the ability to easily take it to a darker site. A good site can easily make a couple of magnitudes difference to what can be seen. The 8" SCT, is probably the commonest slightly larger scope, since here the optical design keeps the unit fairly small, despite the aperture. Best Wishes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mark wrote:
Hi all, I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! I want a general purpose scope where I can see the rings of saturns, nebulae and what have you. I have been recommended a meade etx 125 but that is by the guy in the shop. I was just wondering whay your thoughts are? Among all other good places for information on this subject, this is just one. http://skyandtelescope.com/howto/scopes/ Google is your friend ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mark wrote:
I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! See: http://www.astunit.com/tutorials/firstscope.htm http://www.astunit.com/tutorials/evaluating.htm -- Best, Stephen http://www.astunit.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mark" wrote in message ... Hi all, I guess this has been done to death but I want to buy a telescope and dont know what to get! I want a general purpose scope where I can see the rings of saturns, nebulae and what have you. I have been recommended a meade etx 125 but that is by the guy in the shop. I was just wondering whay your thoughts are? I started with an ETX105, which is a decent scope. But if I would start all over, I would not start with an ETX. the field of view is very small, the aperture is small, hence one can only see the moon, planets and the brighter deepsky objects. This is good enough of course for a beginner-scope, but such a scope does not need goto and the fancy electronics. I would start with a 80mm shorttube refractor. Much cheaper, and easier. Then upgrade to a bigger scope if you want to become more serious about astronomy. -- Martijn (astro-at-pff-software.nl) 10" LX200GPS-SMT ETX105. Coronado PST www.xs4all.nl/~martlian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the replies!
I think I may wait for a while and start some observing with a decent pair of binoculars. Once I get some more experience I will think about which scope to get. I'll probably get a pair of Helios 15x70 Stellar Bino. cheers, Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids | Henri Wilson | Astronomy Misc | 2901 | May 25th 06 12:26 AM |
"First Light" for the Large Binocular Telescope (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 26th 05 04:36 PM |
Large Binocular Telescope to be Dedicated in October 2004 | Ron | Misc | 3 | September 25th 04 06:15 PM |
NASA Announces New Name For Space Infrared Telescope Facility | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 10:59 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |