![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to work through figuring the lumonsity of a star from its
absolute magnitude, ignoring the bolometric correction. I would like to find it's luminosity relative to the Sun and its luminosity in erg -s. The following is A rough computation. I'm not sure where I'm going wrong. Any help would be appreciated. I understand that a B2 star should be about 1000 times more luminous than Sol, Here are the numbers - Canopus56 Mv1-Mv_sol = -2.5 log (L1/L_sol) (Mv1-Mv_sol)/-2.5 = log (L1/L_sol) log(L1/L_sol) = (Mv1-Mv_sol)/-2.5 M_sol = 4.83 Per Garrison (2006), absolute mag-not bolometric L_sol = 3.845 * 10^33 ergs s^-1 per Allen Astrophysical Quantities p. 382 Mv2 = -0.4 alf And a B2 star Mv2 = -0.4 alf And M_sol = 4.83 Per Garrison (2006), absolute mag-not bolometric Mv1-Mv_sol = -2.5 log (L1/L_sol) x = L1/L_sol -5.23 = -2.5 log(x) log(x) = -2.5/-5.23 = 0.478 x = 10^0.478 3.00607 L1/L_sol = 3.00607 L1/(3.845*10^33) = 3.00607 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You made an algebra mistake near the end:
-5.23 = -2.5 log(x) is okay, but then you wrote log(x) = -2.5/-5.23 = 0.478 WRONG! Instead, log(x) = (-5.23)/(-2.5) = 2.092 So x = 10^(2.092) = 124 So the star has 124 solar luminosities, using the starting values you provided. That's good: a difference of exactly 5 magnitudes corresponds to a factor of 100 in brightness, so this is about right. Michael Richmond |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
absolute and relative launch pad | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | November 18th 05 05:43 PM |
absolute and relative launch pad | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 18th 05 05:43 PM |
The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 238 | June 12th 05 01:29 PM |
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 | Stan Byers | Research | 3 | March 23rd 05 01:28 PM |
Absolute and relative time | Jonathan Silverlight | Research | 1 | June 12th 04 11:04 AM |