![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mean Mr Mustard wrote: I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it! Tiny? It's about a light year across making it a trillion times larger than Disneyworld and getting bigger all the time! Get a larger scope. Randy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Randy Roy wrote:
Mean Mr Mustard wrote: I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it! Tiny? It's about a light year across making it a trillion times larger than Disneyworld and getting bigger all the time! Is Disneyworld six miles across? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, yes, if you just consider the theme parks, which is afterall what
most people consider to be Disneyworld. Another way of looking at M57's size is it is about 150 trillion times larger than Graceland give or take a hunk a hunk o' burning love. Randy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mean Mr Mustard wrote: I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it! Guess what? It doesn't like you either. ;-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is actually one of my favorite objects and usually impresses
non-astronomer folks when I show it to them in my 10 inch dob. "Mean Mr Mustard" wrote in message oups.com... I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it!
====================================== I do sort of understand your reasoning, and thoughts Mr Mustard, it's an elusive little bugger to find sometimes! When I first seen pictures years ago of M-57 in Lyra, I thought "Oh man, that is cool". Of course these photos I speak of were probably film emulsions taken through Mount Wilson's Reflector. The first time I personally seen M-57, was through a then new (1968) Edmund 4" F-15 Refractor that I borrowed one summer from my High School in Wisconsin. Yes, through repeated star hopping on the Edmund non-driven EQ Mount, and referring to the somwhat lacking star charts I had back then, I found it! Yes, although small, and I suppose one could say a disappointment after seeing the no doubt hours long photgraphs, still it had that eerie presence just floating in space amongst a field of little jewels (Stars), and was an object that mesmerized me, and still does. Especially when one becomes to learn what it is, and when it was said to happen. Of course back then with the 4" Edmund Achromat, with it's now lowly, but then considered good Kellner, and Ramsden Eyepieces, I wanted more! This was one of the heavenly objects that made me want more. More aperture, darker skies, better eyepieces, better charts-atlas, and on, and on. Fast forwarding 30 years to a Star party at Astrofest 2002, and it's pretty amazing how far we have come, with technology, better scopes, the CCD. I'm crouched over, right next to Roland Christen, with his beautiful AP 10" Mak on his 1200GTO Mount right in front of him, SBIG Cam, and Laptop on his tabletop right out in the field amongst 800 other observers in light polluted Kankakee, Ill skies. He's pulling up images on the fly of M-57 effortlessly, which were absolutely amazing, especially considering we're not camped out on some remote mountaintop somewhere reaping the benefit, and advantage of pristine dark skies. They rivaled the pictures I saw 30 years earlier in books though the massive Mt Wilson reflector, and that's what I find quite amazing. The Central Star of M-57 was easily within the grasp of this Scope/Cam combo, and in fact we were seeing the more elusive Galaxy that is positioned not very far from M-57. Evertime I see M-57, many times I flash back to the simpler, younger times of my life, thoughts reflect back to that old, skinny $347 High School Edmund Refractor, and the first time I seen this object standing out there alone that one cool Wisconsin summer's eve. Ahh memories. Mark D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark D" wrote in message ...
I hate that tiny little ring of smoke ... There I said it! ====================================== I do sort of understand your reasoning, What reasoning? -- Hilton Evans --------------------------------------------------------------- Lon -71° 04' 35.3" Lat +42° 11' 06.7" --------------------------------------------------------------- Webcam Astroimaging http://mysite.verizon.net/hiltonevan...troimaging.htm --------------------------------------------------------------- ChemPen Chemical Structure Software http://www.chempensoftware.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark D wrote:
The first time I personally seen M-57, was through a then new (1968) Edmund 4" F-15 Refractor that I borrowed one summer from my High School in Wisconsin. Now you have me intrigued! I wasn't aware that EdScorp produced long focus refractors in anything larger than 3" ... then I googled and found this beauty. http://valleystargazers.com/gallery/Members/P4280043 Do you know if that was something they produced in Barrington? Was it a rebranded Jaegers or Japanese scope? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mean Mr Mustard wrote:
Mark D wrote: The first time I personally seen M-57, was through a then new (1968) Edmund 4" F-15 Refractor that I borrowed one summer from my High School in Wisconsin. Now you have me intrigued! I wasn't aware that EdScorp produced long focus refractors in anything larger than 3" ... then I googled and found this beauty. http://valleystargazers.com/gallery/Members/P4280043 Do you know if that was something they produced in Barrington? Was it a rebranded Jaegers or Japanese scope? Wow! That is one long tube. I wonder if the Japanese were making scopes for US distribution back in 1968. No memory, one way or the other. Phil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Despite All Israel's Efforts, Arabs Do Not Hate Americans | Raving Loonie | Misc | 0 | September 7th 05 02:46 PM |
Hatch of That ~ Of Thee | Twittering One | Misc | 2 | August 24th 05 05:13 AM |
I Hate Flash (OT, Believe It or Not!) | mark d. doiron | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | November 11th 03 03:04 PM |