![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While imaging NGC 891 on the evening of Dec. 3rd, a stellar-like object
moved in front of the core of NGC 891. Twelve images were taken in all and these 3 images are to show the object (middle frame) and the before and after frames. Object does not appear in any other image. The frame showing the object was taken at 8:04pm MST (03:04UT 04-DEC-2005). All images are 8 minute single exposures with a 10 second interval. Telescope - TEC APO 140 (5.5 in./980mm f/7 refractor), no reducer or flattener. No darks or flats. Baader UV/IR filter. Camera - Canon Rebel XT, IR filter removed. http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/fmo_in_ngc891 Interesting, at least. Comments welcome. Bill Shaheen Gold Canyon, AZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
While imaging NGC 891 on the evening of Dec. 3rd, a stellar-like object moved in front of the core of NGC 891. Twelve images were taken in all and these 3 images are to show the object (middle frame) and the before and after frames. Object does not appear in any other image. The frame showing the object was taken at 8:04pm MST (03:04UT 04-DEC-2005). All images are 8 minute single exposures with a 10 second interval. Telescope - TEC APO 140 (5.5 in./980mm f/7 refractor), no reducer or flattener. No darks or flats. Baader UV/IR filter. Camera - Canon Rebel XT, IR filter removed. http://www.pbase.com/wjshaheen/fmo_in_ngc891 Interesting, at least. Comments welcome. Bill Shaheen Gold Canyon, AZ No proof of motion... two objects? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fist image shows tracking problems. All the stars show a clear but
minor 10 o'clock elongation. Stars are round on the second and third images.Tightest on the second. Focussing variations? Your light track on the second image is resolved into 4 clearly seperated round images if you enlarge the image. This suggests a distant tumbling object with variable reflectivity I think. Or a distant blinking object. Chris.B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris.B wrote:
Fist image shows tracking problems. All the stars show a clear but minor 10 o'clock elongation. Stars are round on the second and third images.Tightest on the second. Focussing variations? Your light track on the second image is resolved into 4 clearly seperated round images if you enlarge the image. This suggests a distant tumbling object with variable reflectivity I think. Or a distant blinking object. Chris.B Edit: I meant to add that the trajectory of the object is not straight but curves slightly upwards on the second image. The end of the track is interesting. Seeming to curve steeply downwards and form a fan-shaped spray of light towards the core. None of this appears on the first or third images. Do you have a larger second image we can look at to confirm this? :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, unfortunately I do not have a larger second image. But, I agree,
based on it's behavior (the strange "S" pattern and the blinking apearance), it is more than likely a piece of tumbling debris in earth orbit. (By the way, it is definitely NOT a cosmic ray hit.) Was hoping someone would have an image from the same timeframe. Thanks. Bill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
orange object moving south 3.15am uk, scunthorpe | Mad Scientist | Misc | 5 | August 24th 04 12:23 PM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
**A SPRING NIGHT WITH A NEXSTAR** | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | April 18th 04 12:29 AM |
Sedna (2003 VB12) | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 19th 04 11:44 AM |
How fast is the Solarsystem/Milky Way moving? | KlingvilleBill | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | December 12th 03 04:52 AM |