Lunacy from Brussels

There's nothing there to irrigate (Mars) with

http://spacebombardment.blogspot.com...-watering.html

That's the general issue with irrigation, so we move the water. Dyson
considered moving small amounts from Enceladus, I'd prefer adjusting
comet's orbits for impact, to get large amounts of heat and water
quickly.

bombardmentforce wrote:

There's nothing there to irrigate (Mars) with

http://spacebombardment.blogspot.com...-watering.html

That's the general issue with irrigation, so we move the water.

How do you plan to just 'move the water' you rabid idiotic fathead ?

You think it's practical to move it from a moon ? You're a real piece of class stupidity.


Graham

Pooh Bear wrote

That's the general issue with irrigation, so we move the water.

How do you plan to just 'move the water' ... ?
Graham

I'd prefer adjusting comet's orbits for impact

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:05:47 -0700, bombardmentforce wrote:

There's nothing there to irrigate (Mars) with

http://spacebombardment.blogspot.com...-watering.html

That's the general issue with irrigation, so we move the water. Dyson
considered moving small amounts from Enceladus, I'd prefer adjusting
comet's orbits for impact, to get large amounts of heat and water
quickly.

Um, perhaps there is a reason there is no longer water on Mars? ...like
the escape velocity is too low to keep it there? mars might be
interesting if it were about 4x bigger, but then we might have competition.

--
Keith

escape velocity is too low to keep (water on Mars)

Commercial terraforming operations live by two rules:

1: Quick operations are needed for R.O.I.

2: Slow leakage does not affect R.O.I., because the replenishment costs
are outside of the time horizon.