![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since they can determine using redshifts whether an
object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich The movement of galaxies should (mainly) be seen as an effect of the universe in itself expanding, not as if the galaxies are moving away from each other in a fixed space. This means that wherever you are in this universe, galaxies will move away from you. Conclusion would be that the point of origin is here, there and everywhere. Or, there is no such point. If you don't understand this, don't worry. No one really does ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich No Center (*every* point is the Big Bang point of origin) http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:55:34 GMT, Sam Wormley
wrote: RichA wrote: Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich No Center (*every* point is the Big Bang point of origin) http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html Oh well, at least they can determine the stucture of the observable universe. I think I read in Sky and Telescope that the sound waves from the Big Bang are responsible for the spacing of galaxies. -Rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RichA wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:55:34 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote: RichA wrote: Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich No Center (*every* point is the Big Bang point of origin) http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html Oh well, at least they can determine the stucture of the observable universe. I think I read in Sky and Telescope that the sound waves from the Big Bang are responsible for the spacing of galaxies. -Rich Here's another good read: News of the Universe http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm#News |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 07:12:48 -0400, RichA wrote:
Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich There is no three-dimensional origin of the Big Bang, so we can't see a direction. Indeed, the fact that we don't see any bias in redshift with direction is one of the important pieces of evidence supporting the Big Bang theories in the first place. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I don't suppose
they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is?" Yes, they do! the big bang happens to have the interesting property that space and time began with the BB, therefore everywhere is the center of the BB! Everywhere is moving away from everywhere else with rather similar geometry. This is the expansion of space-time |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The issue of directionality must wait until it is proven conclusively
there is none. Then it will become a hot issue. Stayed tuned as Wormely cranks his magic search engine in search of truth. GL RichA wrote: Since they can determine using redshifts whether an object is moving away or towards us, I don't suppose they have any idea what "direction" the origin (big bang point of origin) is? I guess it's something like trying to see the curve of the Earth from sea level. -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 01:16:16 -0500, fdjndwifhn wrote:
The issue of directionality must wait until it is proven conclusively there is none. Then it will become a hot issue. Nothing can ever proven conclusively. But in this case, the evidence for a lack of directionality is very, very strong. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I am the American Sailor. | Derek Lyons | History | 38 | November 19th 04 07:44 AM |
Faintest Spectra Ever Raise Glaring Question: Why do Galaxies inthe Young Universe Appear so Mature? (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 5th 04 07:39 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Astrophysics | John Oliver | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 28th 03 06:17 PM |
Catch 'Mars Fever' at Center for Astrophysics | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 24th 03 06:37 AM |