![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "Hubble Origins Probe" (HOP, what's been referred to here as "HST
Mark II") would use a new lighter-weight mirror, presumably to allow a lighter structure and accommodate a cheaper launcher (Atlas, not Shuttle). The instruments would also be new: the ones built for the now-doubtful HST repair mission, not pulled out of some museum exhibit. See http://www.pha.jhu.edu/hop/ One billion dollars is what NASA now says it would charge against its budget for an HST repair flight, which is just one more way for NASA to try to kill the idea. Weighing costs and returns (and ignoring the small incremental risk to the Shuttle itself), to me the HOP proposal looks better than HST repair. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA'S Mars Rovers Pass The 50,000-Picture Mark | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 30th 04 02:20 AM |
The Fourth of July does Not mark the date of Independence [ When will we be able to afford space settlement?] | Stuf4 | Policy | 16 | June 8th 04 07:19 AM |
How do I safely mark up my Sky Atlas 2000? | Edward Smith | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | February 15th 04 10:37 AM |
International Space Station Crews Mark Three Years Aboard | James Oberg | Policy | 22 | November 19th 03 02:06 PM |
International Space Station Crews Mark Three Years Aboard | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 11 | November 7th 03 04:35 AM |